Elizabeth A Mazzio1, Nan Li2, David Bauer1, Patricia Mendonca1, Equar Taka1, Mohammed Darb1, Leeshawn Thomas3, Henry Williams2, Karam F A Soliman4. 1. College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Room 104 Dyson Pharmacy Building, 1520 ML King Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA. 2. School of Environment, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA. 3. College of Science & Technology, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA. 4. College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Room 104 Dyson Pharmacy Building, 1520 ML King Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA. karam.soliman@famu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome arising from infection can lead to multiple organ failure and death, with greater susceptibility occurring in immunocompromised individuals. Moreover, sub-acute chronic inflammation is a contributor to the pathology of diverse degenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and arthritis). Given the known limitations in Western medicine to treat a broad range of inflammatory related illness as well as the emergence of antibiotic resistance, there is a renewed interest in complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) to achieve these means. METHODS: A high throughput (HTP) screening of >1400 commonly sold natural products (bulk herbs, cooking spices, teas, leaves, supplement components, nutraceutical food components, fruit and vegetables, rinds, seeds, polyphenolics etc.) was conducted to elucidate anti-inflammatory substances in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (E. coli serotype O111:B4) monocytes: RAW 264.7 macrophages [peripheral], BV-2 microglia [brain]) relative to hydrocortisone, dexamethasone and L-N6-(1Iminoethyl)lysine (L-NIL). HTP evaluation was also carried out for lethal kill curves against E.coli 0157:H7 1x106 CFU/mL relative to penicillin. Validation studies were performed to assess cytokine profiling using antibody arrays. Findings were corroborated by independent ELISAs and NO2-/iNOS expression quantified using the Griess Reagent and immunocytochemistry, respectively. For robust screening, we developed an in-vitro efficacy paradigm to ensure anti-inflammatory parameters were observed independent of cytotoxicity. This caution was taken given that many plants exert tumoricidal and anti-inflammatory effects at close range through similar signaling pathways, which could lead to false positives. RESULTS: The data show that activated BV-2 microglia cells (+ LPS 1μg/ml) release >10-fold greater IL-6, MIP1/2, RANTES and nitric oxide (NO2-), where RAW 264.7 macrophages (+ LPS 1μg/ml) produced > 10-fold rise in sTNFR2, MCP-1, IL-6, GCSF, RANTES and NO2-. Data validation studies establish hydrocortisone and dexamethasone as suppressing multiple pro-inflammatory processes, where L-NIL suppressed NO2-, but had no effect on iNOS expression or IL-6. The screening results demonstrate relative few valid hits with anti-inflammatory effects at < 250μg/ml for the following: Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis), Elecampagne Root (Inula helenium), Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare),Yerba (Eriodictyon californicum) and Centipeda (Centipeda minima), Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera), Feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), Turmeric Root (Curcuma Longa), Osha Root (Ligusticum porteri), Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) and constituents: cardamonin, apigenin, quercetin, biochanin A, eupatorin, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and butein. Natural products lethal against [E. coli 0157:H7] where the LC50 < 100 μg/ml included bioactive silver hydrosol-Argentyn 23, green tea (its constituents EGCG > Polyphenon 60 > (-)-Gallocatechin > Epicatechin > (+)-Catechin), Grapeseed Extract (Vitis vinifera), Chinese Gallnut (its constituents gallic acid > caffeic acid) and gallic acid containing plants such as Babul Chall Bark (Acacia Arabica), Arjun (Terminalia Arjuna) and Bayberry Root Bark (Morella Cerifera). CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize and validate the previous work of others and identify the most effective CAM anti-inflammatory, antibacterial compounds using these models. Future work will be required to evaluate potential combination strategies for long-term use to prevent chronic inflammation and possibly lower the risk of sepsis in immunocompromised at risk populations.
BACKGROUND: Acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome arising from infection can lead to multiple organ failure and death, with greater susceptibility occurring in immunocompromised individuals. Moreover, sub-acute chronic inflammation is a contributor to the pathology of diverse degenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and arthritis). Given the known limitations in Western medicine to treat a broad range of inflammatory related illness as well as the emergence of antibiotic resistance, there is a renewed interest in complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) to achieve these means. METHODS: A high throughput (HTP) screening of >1400 commonly sold natural products (bulk herbs, cooking spices, teas, leaves, supplement components, nutraceutical food components, fruit and vegetables, rinds, seeds, polyphenolics etc.) was conducted to elucidate anti-inflammatory substances in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (E. coli serotype O111:B4) monocytes: RAW 264.7 macrophages [peripheral], BV-2 microglia [brain]) relative to hydrocortisone, dexamethasone and L-N6-(1Iminoethyl)lysine (L-NIL). HTP evaluation was also carried out for lethal kill curves against E.coli 0157:H7 1x106 CFU/mL relative to penicillin. Validation studies were performed to assess cytokine profiling using antibody arrays. Findings were corroborated by independent ELISAs and NO2-/iNOS expression quantified using the Griess Reagent and immunocytochemistry, respectively. For robust screening, we developed an in-vitro efficacy paradigm to ensure anti-inflammatory parameters were observed independent of cytotoxicity. This caution was taken given that many plants exert tumoricidal and anti-inflammatory effects at close range through similar signaling pathways, which could lead to false positives. RESULTS: The data show that activated BV-2 microglia cells (+ LPS 1μg/ml) release >10-fold greater IL-6, MIP1/2, RANTES and nitric oxide (NO2-), where RAW 264.7 macrophages (+ LPS 1μg/ml) produced > 10-fold rise in sTNFR2, MCP-1, IL-6, GCSF, RANTES and NO2-. Data validation studies establish hydrocortisone and dexamethasone as suppressing multiple pro-inflammatory processes, where L-NIL suppressed NO2-, but had no effect on iNOS expression or IL-6. The screening results demonstrate relative few valid hits with anti-inflammatory effects at < 250μg/ml for the following: Bay Leaf (Laurus nobilis), Elecampagne Root (Inula helenium), Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare),Yerba (Eriodictyon californicum) and Centipeda (Centipeda minima), Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera), Feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), Turmeric Root (Curcuma Longa), Osha Root (Ligusticum porteri), Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) and constituents: cardamonin, apigenin, quercetin, biochanin A, eupatorin, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and butein. Natural products lethal against [E. coli 0157:H7] where the LC50 < 100 μg/ml included bioactive silver hydrosol-Argentyn 23, green tea (its constituents EGCG > Polyphenon 60 > (-)-Gallocatechin > Epicatechin > (+)-Catechin), Grapeseed Extract (Vitis vinifera), Chinese Gallnut (its constituents gallic acid > caffeic acid) and gallic acid containing plants such as Babul Chall Bark (Acacia Arabica), Arjun (Terminalia Arjuna) and Bayberry Root Bark (Morella Cerifera). CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize and validate the previous work of others and identify the most effective CAM anti-inflammatory, antibacterial compounds using these models. Future work will be required to evaluate potential combination strategies for long-term use to prevent chronic inflammation and possibly lower the risk of sepsis in immunocompromised at risk populations.
Global health initiatives are encumbered by a vast majority of the population suffering from non-communicable inflammatory diseases such as cardiovascular disease, neurodegeneration, diabetes, arthritis, ulcerative colitis/bowel disease and cancer. Also, with increased incidence of antibiotic resistance, acute inflammation from sepsis plays a major role in mortalities arising from diverse infectious agents [1, 2]. Given limitations in Western medicine to treat/prevent a broad range of inflammatory related illness, there is a renewed interest in complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) to achieve these means [3-9].While there exist a plethora of scientific publications on the efficacy of individual CAMs in specific inflammatory models, there lacks a relative comparative potency rank of the most commonly marketed CAMs in a single study, conducted under uniform conditions. Our high throughput (HTP) screening library houses over 1400 products most which are available and sold to consumers throughout the world in the form of bulk herbs, cooking spices, teas, leaves, supplement components, nutraceutical food components, fruit and vegetables, roots, rinds, seeds, polyphenolics etc. The purpose of the current study is to screen commonly utilized CAMs for anti-inflammatory efficacy under uniform standard conditions to elucidate the most potent at non-toxic/low therapeutic concentrations (<250 μg/mL), and further to compare these to steroidal and NSAID drugs.The in-vitro model employed was that of monocytes (peripheral and central nervous system) stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) derived from E. coli O111:B4. LPS is a cell wall endotoxic component from gram negative bacteria which evokes a deadly cytokine storm associated with septicemia, septic shock and multi organ failure. Known biologic consequences of LPS include the colossal release of chemotactic cytokines, IL-3 IL-12, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-1 beta, inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) NO3 -/NO2 -, P-selectin, CD 11b/CD18 (Mac-1) ICAM-1, PGE2 which enable massive neutrophil infiltration and hemolytic [10-13]. While many of these inflammatory molecules at high concentrations are lethal, sub-chronic rises of the same are associated with age related inflammatory degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and arthritis [14-17]. Therefore, the use of LPS in this model and subsequent elucidation of the most effective CAMs against inflammatory parameters, can provide information on potential therapeutics for both chronic and acute inflammatory processes.In this study, we conduct a HTP screening of CAMs to assess both capacity to kill a pathogenic strain of E.coli 0157:H7 as well as to mitigate the pro-inflammatory effects from E.Coli derived endotoxin cell wall component; LPS.
Methods
Hanks Balanced Salt Solution, (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) (HEPES), ethanol, sulfanilamide, 96 well plates, general reagents and supplies, were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, (St Louis, MO, USA) or VWR (Radnor, PA, USA). Imaging probes were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). Natural products were purchased from Frontier Natural Products Co-op (Norway, IA, USA), Monterey Bay Spice Company (Watsonville, CA, USA), Mountain Rose Herbs (Eugene, OR, USA), Mayway Traditional Chinese Herbs (Oakland, CA, USA), Kalyx Natural Marketplace (Camden, NY, USA), Futureceuticals (Momence, IL, USA), organic fruit vegetable market: New Leaf (Tallahassee, FL, USA), Florida Food Products Inc. (Eustis, FL, USA), Patel Brothers Indian Grocery (Tampa, FL, USA), Opil Gold from Aging Sciences LLC (Wayland, MA, USA) and Colloidal Silver - Argentyn 23® Natural Immunogenics (Sarasota, FL, USA). Elisa kits and cytokine antibody arrays were purchased from Assay Biotech (Sunnyvale, CA) and Raybiotech (Norcross, GA, USA).
Cell culture
BV-2 microglia (BV-2) cells were provided by Elizabeta Blasi [18], and RAW 264.7 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were cultured in DMEM high glucose media [glucose 4500 mg/L] containing 5% FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/0.1 mg/mL). Culture conditions were maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2/atmosphere and every 2–3 days, the media was replaced and cells sub-cultured. For experiments, plating media consisted of DMEM (minus phenol red) [glucose 4500 mg/L], 2.5% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/0.1 mg/mL). LPSO111:B4 was prepared in HBSSat 1 mg/mL and stored at –20 °C. For experiments, LPS was added to the culture media at a working concentration of 1μg/mL.
Bacterial culture
A single colony of E. coli O157:H7 was grown on an agar plate. E. coli was then inoculated into a 20 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) in a flask, grown at 37 °C with moderate shaking (180 rpm), to an OD 600 nm = 0.6. One mL of the culture suspension was moved into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged for 1 min at 10,000 g (4 °C). After discarding the supernatant, the bacterial pellet was re- suspended in 1 mL sterilized water. This centrifugation was repeated twice. The bacteria were stored at 4 °C. The bacterial cell numbers were then determined using colony forming units (CFU) through serial dilution plating on LB plate at 37 °C. The experimental concentration of E. coli was 1 x 106 CFU/mL.
Sample preparation
All natural chemicals and reference drugs were dissolved in DMSO [5–20mg/mL] and crude herbs in absolute ethanol [50 mg/mL] after being diced, macerated and powdered then stored at –20 °C. All plants were cataloged by manufacturer, botanical and common names. All dilutions were prepared in sterile HBSS + 5 mM HEPES, adjusted to a pH of 7.4, ensuring solvent concentration of DMSO or absolute ethanol at less than 0.5%.
Cell and microbial -viability
Cell and microbial viability were assessed using resazurin [7-Hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one 10-oxide] (Alamar Blue) indicator dye [19]. A working solution of resazurin was prepared in sterile HBSS minus phenol red (0.5 mg/mL), then added (15% v/v) to each sample. Samples were returned to the incubator for 2–4 h, and reduction of the dye by viable cells (to resorufin, a fluorescent compound) was quantitatively analyzed using a Synergy HTX multi-mode reader Bio-Tek Inc. (Winooski, VT, USA) with settings at [550 nm/580 nm], [excitation/emission].
In-Vitro efficacy index
Several methodological concerns were addressed regarding HTP screenings. These included basic controls for pH (neutralized with buffered HBSS) and cell viability. In-vitro, immortal (malignant) immunocompetent cell lines such as glioma cells, macrophages, microglia, lymphocytes or granulocytes are of tumor origin, and many natural compounds simultaneously induce apoptosis in malignant cells and attenuate inflammation via the same pathways (i.e. phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)/NF-κB) [20-26]. For this reason, we constructed and utilized an in-vitro efficacy index (iEI) paradigm, to ensure that anti-inflammatory effects are occurring at non-cytotoxic concentrations. The iEI is defined as the LC50 (toxic concentration)/IC50 (anti-inflammatory concentration) ratio, with higher values reflecting a greater confidence in the anti-inflammatory effects occurring independently of cell death.
Nitrite (NO2–)/iNOS expression
Quantification of nitrite (NO2−) was determined using the Greiss reagent [27]. The Greiss reagent was prepared by mixing an equal volume of 1.0% sulfanilamide in 10% phosphoric acid and 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine in deionized water, which was added directly to the cell supernatant (experimental media consisting of DMEM - phenol red) and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Controls and blanks were run simultaneously, and subtracted from the final value to eliminate interference. Samples were analyzed at 540 nm on a Synergy HTX multi-mode reader; Bio-Tek (Winooski, VT, USA).iNOS protein expression was determined using immunocytochemistry. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X 100 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with anti-iNOS, an N-Terminal antibody produced in rabbit for 24 h at 4 °C in a casein blocking buffer. Samples were washed in PBS, then incubated with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate for two hours at RT. Samples were counterstained with propidium iodide and imaged using a fluorescent/inverted microscope, CCD camera and data acquisition using ToupTek View ; ToupTek Photonics Co (Zhejiang, P.R.China).
Mouse cytokine antibody array
Mouse Cytokine Antibody Arrays (Product Code: AAM-CYT-1000) Ray Biotech; (Norcross, GA, USA) were used to profile the effects of LPS (1μg/mL) on BV-2 and RAW 234.7 cell lines. Each experiment was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and in triplicate. Briefly, antibody-coated array membranes were first incubated for 30 min with 1 mL of blocking buffer. After 30 min, blocking buffer was decanted and replaced with 1 mL supernatant from control (untreated) samples, cells treated with (1ug/mLLPS only) and a media blank. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with mild shaking. The next day, the medium was decanted; membranes were washed, and subsequently incubated with 1 mLbiotin-conjugated antibodies for 6 h. Lastly, biotin-conjugated antibodies were removed and membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated streptavidin (2h), then evaluated for densitometry using a chemiluminescence substrate monitored on a VersaDoc Imager/Quantity One software from Bio-Rad: (Hercules, CA, USA).
IL-6 (Interleukin-6) ELISA
After experimental treatment, cells supernatants were directly evaluated for concentration of IL-6 using a MurineOmniKine™ IL-6 ELISA (Product Code # OK-0187), Assay Biotechnology Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), performed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Data was quantified by optical density at 450 nm using a Synergy HTX multi-mode reader from Bio-Tek (Winooski, VT, USA).
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism (version 3.0; Graph Pad Software Inc. San Diego, CA, USA) with significance of difference between the groups assessed using a one-way ANOVA then followed by Tukey post hoc means comparison test, or a Student’s t test. IC50s were determined by regression analysis using Origin Software (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA).
Results
Validation
Validation studies were conducted to determine profiled cytokine differentials in LPS activated RAW 264.7 (Fig. 1) and BV-2 cells (Fig. 2), respectively - using semi quantitative antibody microarrays, which were run in triplicate. The representative panel shows both cell lines exposed to LPS prompted the greater release of MCP-1, GCSF, MIP1a, MIP1g and MIP-2, sTNFR1/11, RANTES and IL-6. Quantitative analysis of IL-6 was corroborated by ELISA (Fig. 3), and iNOS protein expression was evaluated by ICC (Fig. 4b) and NO2- release using the Griess Reagent (Fig. 4a), the latter of which was reduced in the presence of iNOS inhibitor (L-NIL).
Fig. 1
Cytokine release profile in LPS activated RAW 264.7 cells. The data are displayed as the cytokine array blot image and array grid layout with leading changes presented in highlighted boxes
Fig. 2
Cytokine release profile in LPS activated BV-2 cells. The data are displayed as the cytokine array blot image and array grid layout with leading changes presented in highlighted boxes
Fig. 3
ELISA: Quantification of IL-6 in the supernatant of resting and LPS activated cells (BV-2 cells, RAW 264.7 cells). The data represent IL-6 (pg/μl) and are expressed as the Mean ± S. E. M., n = 3. Differences between resting and LPS activated cells were determined by a student’s T test (*) P < 0.001
Fig. 4
NO2- production in resting and LPS activated cells (BV-2 cells, RAW 264.7 cells) ± selective iNOS inhibitor: L-NIL (12 μg/mL). The data represent NO2- produced (μM) and are expressed as the Mean ± S. E. M., n = 3. Differences between resting and LPS activated cells were determined by a student’s T test (*) P < 0.001. Differences between LPS vs. LPS/L-NIL treated cells were determined by a student’s T test [*] P < 0.001. iNOS expression was analyzed by ICC using rabbit anti-mouse iNOS/goat anti-rabbit Alexafluor 488, in fixed permeabilized, propidium iodide nuclear counterstained cells (a) resting BV-2 cells (b) resting RAW 264.7 cells (c) LPS activated BV-2 cells (d) and RAW 264.7 cells
Cytokine release profile in LPS activated RAW 264.7 cells. The data are displayed as the cytokine array blot image and array grid layout with leading changes presented in highlighted boxesCytokine release profile in LPS activated BV-2 cells. The data are displayed as the cytokine array blot image and array grid layout with leading changes presented in highlighted boxesELISA: Quantification of IL-6 in the supernatant of resting and LPS activated cells (BV-2 cells, RAW 264.7 cells). The data represent IL-6 (pg/μl) and are expressed as the Mean ± S. E. M., n = 3. Differences between resting and LPS activated cells were determined by a student’s T test (*) P < 0.001NO2- production in resting and LPS activated cells (BV-2 cells, RAW 264.7 cells) ± selective iNOS inhibitor: L-NIL (12 μg/mL). The data represent NO2- produced (μM) and are expressed as the Mean ± S. E. M., n = 3. Differences between resting and LPS activated cells were determined by a student’s T test (*) P < 0.001. Differences between LPS vs. LPS/L-NIL treated cells were determined by a student’s T test [*] P < 0.001. iNOS expression was analyzed by ICC using rabbit anti-mouseiNOS/goat anti-rabbitAlexafluor 488, in fixed permeabilized, propidium iodide nuclear counterstained cells (a) resting BV-2 cells (b) resting RAW 264.7 cells (c) LPS activated BV-2 cells (d) and RAW 264.7 cells
Screening
The initial HTP screening was conducted using a natural plant library housing over 1400 extracts including: 1) Plants: seeds, fruits, vegetables and herbs (of diverse ethnic nature including Chinese, Egyptian, Indian etc.) 2) Natural derived chemicals/polyphenolics 3) Metabolic Substrates: amino acids, vitamins and energy intermediates such as organic acids, glycolytic intermediates and 4) Reference NSAID and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The preliminary screen was conducted to assess reduction of NO2- in LPS activated cells [equal to or less than 230 μg/mL] for all compounds (Fig. 5a). Substances that attenuated NO2– at less than 50% of the 1st tier starting concentrations, were re-evaluated over a dose range where LC50s (cytotoxicity) and IC50s (NO2-) were simultaneously evaluated (Fig. 5b, c). From the linear regression, LC50, IC50s concentrations were determined and in-vitro efficacy index (iEI) was calculated by the ratio value : LC50/IC50 . The higher the ratio, the greater confidence of true anti-inflammatory effects, not attributable to cell death. All iEI values are presented in Table 1 for RAW 264.7 cells/Table 2 for BV-2 cells, with matching logarithmic scatter-plots (Figs.6 and 7). Figure 8 shows a sample of NO2-/viability dose response data, with corresponding immunochemical imaging for iNOS in RAW 264.7 cells, where supernatant was evaluated for IL–6. The data from these experiments show that L-NIL, while capable of inhibiting the catalytic function of iNOS, was not an anti-inflammatory in the true sense. L-NIL suppressed NO2- but had no effects on cytokine release or expression of iNOS. Most lead compounds that reduced NO2- in both cell lines at sub-lethal concentrations (2 x IC50 for NO2-inhibition) which corresponded to a reduction of IL-6 in sample supernatant (Fig. 9). The antimicrobial effects of natural products on the survival of E.coli 0157:H7 (1x106 CFU/mL) were then evaluated. The data show only a select few have therapeutic potency relative to penicillin/streptomycin (Table 3), colloidal silver being the most effective (Fig. 10). The findings from this study delineate the most potent anti-inflammatory/and antibacterial natural compounds, when conducted in a uniform controlled fashion in these particular models.
Fig. 5
High-through-put study design. The basic study layout consisted of a primary first level tier 1 screening by which all CAMs were tested to reduce NO2- in LPS treated BV-2 and RAW 264.7 cells [maximum working concentrations were : 230μg/mL (plant based) and 92μg/ml (metabolites, drugs and polyphenolics)]. a, b Compounds displaying an IC50 below the 1st tier concentrations were further evaluated as per the template (c). All compounds were simultaneously evaluated for toxicity/anti-inflammatory effects and an iEI differential was established (LC50/IC50) to prevent false positives incurred by cytotoxic effects
Table 1
Efficacy of anti-inflammatory CAMS relative to cellular toxicity in LPS activated RAW 264.7 cells
RAW 264.7 cells + 1μ/mL LPS: anti-inflammatory potency
Substance
Anti-inflammatory IC50 (μg/mL)
Toxicity LC50 (μg/mL)
iEI (LC50/IC50)
L-N-lysine dihydrochloride
4.4
250.0
>57.4
Cardamonin
6.1
250.0
>40.8
Dexamethasone
1.6
260.0
>22.4
Hydrocortisone
45.6
250.0
>5.4
Bay Leaf/Laurus nobilis
92.6
537.0
>5.8
Tansy Herb/Tanacetum vulgare
76.7
934.9
12.2
Apicidin
0.2
2.4
11.7
Apigenin
30.8
252.0
8.2
Yerba Santa Lf/E. californicum
194.0
1413.4
7.3
Butein
8.0
57.9
7.3
Ashwagandha/Withania somnifera
457.2
3306.0
7.2
Centipeda Herb/Centipeda minima
213.7
1260.5
5.9
Rosemary Lf/Rosmarinus officinalis
132.4
754.8
5.7
Feverfew/Tanacetum parthenium
48.4
264.2
5.5
Green Tea Std sigma T5550
45.5
228.7
5.0
Elecampane Root/Inula helenium
257.8
1276.0
4.9
Quercetin
14.3
63.8
4.5
Commiphora myrrha resin
127.1
5221.1
4.1
Amla/Phyllanthus emblica
156.7
641.0
4.1
Herb de province
203.4
793.2
3.9
Turmeric Root/Curcuma longa
87.3
274.3
3.1
Biochanin A
119.0
345.1
2.9
Trifala
195.3
559.5
2.9
Cinnamon/Cinnamomum burmannii
344.9
923.0
>2.6
EGCG
20.0
50.8
2.5
Bergamottin
67.1
161.7
2.4
Osha Root/Ligusticum porteri
43.4
104.1
2.4
Kalijiri Purple Fleablame
58.0
130.0
2.2
Curcumin
12.6
28.1
2.2
Rabdosia rubescens Herb
104.9
220.3
2.1
White Sage/Salvia apiana
62.0
129.5
2.1
Blood Root/Sanguinaria canadensis
23.4
47.4
2.0
The data represent LC50 values for toxicity and IC50 values for NO2- reduction both determined by regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrations,(n = 4). The ratio of LC50/IC50 μg/mL is the iEI (in- vitro efficacy index), where the greater the value the greater the confidence in the anti-inflammatory effects. The symbol [>] denotes an iEI value acquired on a maximum upper limit concentration being tested
Table 2
Efficacy of natural anti-inflammatory compounds relative to cellular toxicity in LPS activated BV-2 cells
The data represent LC50 values for toxicity and IC50 values for NO2- reduction both determined by regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrations,(n = 4). The ratio of LC50/IC50 μg/mL is the iEI (in- vitro efficacy index), where the greater the value the greater the confidence in the anti-inflammatory effects. The symbol [>] denotes an iEI value acquired on a maximum upper limit concentration being tested
Fig. 6
In-vitro efficacy scatter-plot for NO2–, inhibition vs. cell toxicity in RAW 264.7 cells. The data are presented as LC50 (toxicity) vs. IC50 (iNOS inhibition) determined from a regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrations
Fig. 7
In-vitro efficacy scatter-plot for NO2–, inhibition vs. cell toxicity in BV-2 cells. The data are presented as LC50 (toxicity) vs. IC50 (iNOS inhibition) determined from a regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrations
Fig. 8
Linear regression profiles for NO2- inhibition and toxicity in RAW 264.7 cells, by which LC50s and IC50s were calculated for all compounds, presented along with corresponding iNOS ICC images and IL-6 release measured at concentrations reflected by a square (◘). The data represent NO2- and viability (% LPS Control), presented as the Mean ± S.E.M, n = 4. Statistical difference from the Controls were determined by a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post – hoc test * P < 0.05 and IL-6 from controls by a student’s t-test* P < 0.05
Fig. 9
Effects of lead anti-inflammatory products on IL-6 release in LPS treated BV-2 and RAW 264.7 cells. The data represents IL-6 (as % LPS Control) and expressed as the Mean ± S.E.M., n = 3. Differences between activated cells ± natural compounds at sub-lethal dose were determined by a student’s T test (*) P < 0.001
Table 3
Efficacy of CAM antibacterial compounds on survival of E.coli 0157:H7 (1x106 CFU/ml) @ 8 h in 31 °C
Anti-bacterial effects of natural compounds on E. coli 0157:H7 survival
Compound
LC50
Units
Penicillin/Streptomycin
0.01
Units/μg.ml
Cholloidal Silver-Argentym 23®
0.02
μg/ml
(+) Gossypol
1.5
μg/ml
Grapeseed Extract/Vitis Vinifera
1.8
μg/ml
Green Tea Extract/Camellia Sinensis
2.0
μg/ml
(-)-Epigallocatechin gallate
3.7
μg/ml
Doxorubin hydrochloride
5.4
μg/ml
Gallic Acid
8.4
μg/ml
Caffeic Acid
10.1
μg/ml
Chinese Gallnut
10.4
μg/ml
Babul Chall Bark/Acacia arabica
13.4
μg/ml
Polyphenon 60
14.1
μg/ml
Uva Ursi/Arctostaphylos uva ursi
19.1
μg/ml
Arjun/Terminalia arjuna
23.8
μg/ml
Balm of Gilead Bud/Populus candicans
26.7
μg/ml
Bayberry Root/Morella cerifera
28.5
μg/ml
Blood Root/Sanguinaria canadensis/
33.5
μg/ml
(-)-Gallocatechin
35.8
μg/ml
2-D08
37.0
μg/ml
Glyoxal Acid
39.6
μg/ml
Scutellarian
42.0
μg/ml
Kokum Black/Garcinia Indica
47.5
μg/ml
Indole
47.5
μg/ml
Trifala
47.7
μg/ml
CraneSbill Root/Geranium maculatum
51.6
μg/ml
Shi Liu Pi (Granati Peel)
60.4
μg/ml
Catuaba Bark/Trichilia Catigua
63.4
μg/ml
Chapparal/Larrea tridentata
73.6
μg/ml
Thymol
92.0
μg/ml
Esculetin
93.3
μg/ml
Epicatechin
114.0
μg/ml
Piperonal
115.1
μg/ml
(+)-Catechin
173.0
μg/ml
The data represents LC50 values determined by regression analysis, on a minimum of 6 concentrations, (n = 4)
Fig. 10
The effect of colloidal Silver-Argentyn 23® on the survival of E.coli 0157:H7 (1x106 CFU/ml) @ 8 h in 31°C. The data represent viability (% Control), presented as the Mean ± S.E.M, n = 4. Statistical differences from the Control were determined by a one-way ANOVA, using the Tukey post – hoc test. * P < 0.05
High-through-put study design. The basic study layout consisted of a primary first level tier 1 screening by which all CAMs were tested to reduce NO2- in LPS treated BV-2 and RAW 264.7 cells [maximum working concentrations were : 230μg/mL (plant based) and 92μg/ml (metabolites, drugs and polyphenolics)]. a, b Compounds displaying an IC50 below the 1st tier concentrations were further evaluated as per the template (c). All compounds were simultaneously evaluated for toxicity/anti-inflammatory effects and an iEI differential was established (LC50/IC50) to prevent false positives incurred by cytotoxic effectsEfficacy of anti-inflammatory CAMS relative to cellular toxicity in LPS activated RAW 264.7 cellsThe data represent LC50 values for toxicity and IC50 values for NO2- reduction both determined by regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrations,(n = 4). The ratio of LC50/IC50 μg/mL is the iEI (in- vitro efficacy index), where the greater the value the greater the confidence in the anti-inflammatory effects. The symbol [>] denotes an iEI value acquired on a maximum upper limit concentration being testedEfficacy of natural anti-inflammatory compounds relative to cellular toxicity in LPS activated BV-2 cellsThe data represent LC50 values for toxicity and IC50 values for NO2- reduction both determined by regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrations,(n = 4). The ratio of LC50/IC50 μg/mL is the iEI (in- vitro efficacy index), where the greater the value the greater the confidence in the anti-inflammatory effects. The symbol [>] denotes an iEI value acquired on a maximum upper limit concentration being testedIn-vitro efficacy scatter-plot for NO2–, inhibition vs. cell toxicity in RAW 264.7 cells. The data are presented as LC50 (toxicity) vs. IC50 (iNOS inhibition) determined from a regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrationsIn-vitro efficacy scatter-plot for NO2–, inhibition vs. cell toxicity in BV-2 cells. The data are presented as LC50 (toxicity) vs. IC50 (iNOS inhibition) determined from a regression analysis on a minimum of 6 concentrationsLinear regression profiles for NO2- inhibition and toxicity in RAW 264.7 cells, by which LC50s and IC50s were calculated for all compounds, presented along with corresponding iNOS ICC images and IL-6 release measured at concentrations reflected by a square (◘). The data represent NO2- and viability (% LPS Control), presented as the Mean ± S.E.M, n = 4. Statistical difference from the Controls were determined by a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post – hoc test * P < 0.05 and IL-6 from controls by a student’s t-test* P < 0.05Effects of lead anti-inflammatory products on IL-6 release in LPS treated BV-2 and RAW 264.7 cells. The data represents IL-6 (as % LPS Control) and expressed as the Mean ± S.E.M., n = 3. Differences between activated cells ± natural compounds at sub-lethal dose were determined by a student’s T test (*) P < 0.001Efficacy of CAM antibacterial compounds on survival of E.coli 0157:H7 (1x106 CFU/ml) @ 8 h in 31 °CThe data represents LC50 values determined by regression analysis, on a minimum of 6 concentrations, (n = 4)The effect of colloidal Silver-Argentyn 23® on the survival of E.coli 0157:H7 (1x106 CFU/ml) @ 8 h in 31°C. The data represent viability (% Control), presented as the Mean ± S.E.M, n = 4. Statistical differences from the Control were determined by a one-way ANOVA, using the Tukey post – hoc test. * P < 0.05
Discussion
The data from this study establish several findings including [A] uncorroborated anti-inflammatory/antimicrobial effects for over a thousand natural compounds at concentrations less than 230 μg/mL using this model; [B] corroborating data of existing work by other research groups regarding anti-inflammatory effects of green tea, curcumin, turmeric and rosemary ; and antimicrobial properties of green tea, its catechins, Chinese gallnut, gallic acid plant derived anti-fungal agents (cotton/gossypol) or silver nanoparticle dispersions [28-37]. Lastly; [C] this work provides new evidence on some lesser acknowledged herbs to which historical medicinal value has been attributed, but little research has been documented. Some of these include the following.Elecampane (
Inula helenium) (IH) has extensive historical medicinal value, where its use dates back to the Iron Age (c. 800–450 B.C.) throughout the third century B.C. to 79 A.D. also mentioned by Pliny and further corroborated in the Chilandar Medical Codex (13th or 14th centuries A.D.) [38]. Within the last century, scientific documentation is somewhat sparse on this herb having primarily focused on its ability to cause allergic dermatitis or act as an anti-cancer agent attributable to the content of alantolactone and isoalantolactone [39-44]. Meager work has been performed investigating the effect of IH on sepsis or age relate chronic inflammatory conditions. Although meager research has been conducted in IH, the findings presented here are in alignment with existing researchers who have reported its capacity to attenuate iNOS/NO2-, COX-2/PGE2, HMGB1 release and NF-κB in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells or phorbol activated T cells [45-48]. Interestingly, although we did not find IH to have significant antimicrobial effects on E.coli 0157:H7 (1x106 CFU/mL) at the low concentrations criteria used in this study, others have reported its capacity to destroy invasive pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus/methicillin-resistant (MRSA) gram-positive bacteria, yeasts parasites and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [42, 49–53]. These studies suggest IH as being somewhat promising for attenuating inflammation arising from diverse infective or inflammatory insults.The data from this work also show that fresh dried ethanol extracts of Bay leaf (BL) (
Laurus nobilis
contains anti-inflammatory properties [54, 55]. Previous work by others demonstrates the oil (not aqueous) extracts to contain antimicrobial/food preserving properties due to cineole, eugenol, pinene, eucalyptol, linalool, carvacrol and α-terpinenyl acetate all evidentially toxic to Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus/pyogenes) and fungi (Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus) [56-59]. Again, regarding the aqueous extract of BL, our work corroborates the work of others having reported the capacity to attenuate LPS mediated microglia/macrophage activation thought to be attributable to its sesquiterpene content [60, 61]. These type of substances are thought to be beneficial in chronic age related degeneration, by not only reducing inflammation but also blocking neurotoxicity of AD pathological Aβ (25-35)-component fragments [62].Another herbal extract used in the current study to which little data exists is Centipeda minima (CM). CM has previously been reported to contain high levels of helenalin with the capacity to LPS mediated elevation of NO2–,TNF-α, IL-1b, iNOS and cyclooxygenase-2 in macrophages [63]. CM also demonstrates the capacity to attenuate tissue injury in-vivo involving inflammation such as carrageen paw edema and liver fibrosis [63-65]. Although we did not find CM to have significant antimicrobial effects on E.coli 0157:H7 (1 x 106 CFU/mL) at the low concentration criteria used in this study, others have reported its capacity to kill Enterobacter aerogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia enterocolitica and Bacillus subtilis [66, 67].Feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) (TP) is another rarely evaluated herb which long been reported to treat inflammatory conditions including psoriasis, allergies, arthritis, asthma and particularly migraines [68]. TP derived sesquiterpene lactones such as parthenolide are believed to be responsible for observed anti-inflammatory effects in animal models of carrageenan-induced edema, osteoarthritis, colitis cystic fibrosis and phorbol triggered mouse-ear edema [69-73]. TP constituents also antagonize toll-like receptors, Akt/mTOR and NF-κB pathways and block the downstream release of cytokines [74, 75]. Like the present study, previous research reports also corroborate capacity to reduce LPS activation of BV-2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells alike [76, 77]. There is also an antinociceptive aspect to feverfew commonly reported, having benefit to ameliorate pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy [78].The use of tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) (TV) as a medicinal plant was reported dating back to the 8th century A.D., when the Benedictine monks used it to treat intestinal worms, ameliorate digestive problems, fevers and sores. Interestingly, both feverfew and tansy have in common hyper allergenic potential due to parthenolide [79, 80]. Tansy is also rich in flavonoid glycosides, 7-O-glucosides of apigenin, luteolin, scutellarein and 6- hydroxyluteolin, chrysoeriol and eriodictyol as well as aglycones, hispidulin, nepetin, eupatilin, jaceosidin, pectolinarigenin and axillarin [81]. The oil contains 1,8-cineole and β-thujone as a major constituent along with carveol, umbellulone, davanone, dihydrocarvone, chrysanthenol, borneol and myrtenol [82-85].Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (WS) is a highly studied herb with a plethora of known health benefits, in particular for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Its primary bioactive compound (Withaferin A) directly inhibits β1-adrenergic receptors, HMG-CoA, angiotensinogen-converting enzyme, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein and elevation of protective high density lipoproteins and endogenous antioxidant systems [86, 87]. In animal models, WS prevents isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction, stroke distal middle cerebral artery occlusion and monocrotaline induced pulmonary hypertension in rats [88-91]. With respect to the immune system, WS can attenuate mitogen induced T/B-cell activation, secretion of Th1 and Th2 cytokines and inhibit NF-κB nuclear translocation in lymphocytes [92]. These immunomodulating effects of WS are also reported in-vitro for systemic LPS or E. coli administration in mammals, where there is a reduction in neutrophil tissue infiltration [93, 94] as well as tissue damage and pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis [95-97]. Ashwagandha is also an anti-infective agent lethal to gram-positive bacteria/cocci such as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus, respectively [98]. The data in this study ranks, validates and confirms pre-existing research showing significant antimicrobial effects of green teaEGCGpolyphenon-60 (PP-60) Acacia arabica,grapeseed extract, caffeic, gallic acid, chapparal (Larrea tridentata) [99-109], where little has been investigated on antimicrobial herbs such as balm of Gilead Bud (Populus candicans), an herb of great historical significance with observed antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the data obtained in this work affords general information on validated CAM anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial compounds and relative potency at sub lethal concentrations in LPS activated BV-2 and RAW 264.7 cells. Moreover, the data obtained also provide relative lethal potency of CAMs against the growth of E.coli 0157:H7. These findings can serve as a guide for future examination of specific CAM based herbal/nutraceutical anti-inflammatory/antimicrobial modalities for use in prevention or treatment of disease.
Authors: Lorenzo Di Cesare Mannelli; Barbara Tenci; Matteo Zanardelli; Anna Maidecchi; Andrea Lugli; Luisa Mattoli; Carla Ghelardini Journal: Phytomedicine Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 5.340
Authors: Yan Zhao; Si-jia Chen; Jian-cheng Wang; Hong-xin Niu; Qian-qian Jia; Xiao-wen Chen; Xiao-yan Du; Lu Lu; Bo Huang; Quan Zhang; Yue Chen; Hai-bo Long Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Eva Pinho; Isabel C F R Ferreira; Lillian Barros; Ana Maria Carvalho; Graça Soares; Mariana Henriques Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Lilian Basso; Tamia K Lapointe; Mircea Iftinca; Candace Marsters; Morley D Hollenberg; Deborah M Kurrasch; Christophe Altier Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 11.205