A naturopathic treatment approach for mild and moderate COVID-19: A retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant morbidity and mortality. Although COVID-19 vaccination is available, therapeutic options are still needed. The goal of the present manuscript is to report on a treatment strategy used in a naturopathic medical practice for mild and moderate COVID-19.
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with mild and moderate COVID-19 who were provided multi-nutrient, herbal, and probiotic treatment in a rural, out-patient, naturopathic primary care setting. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome was treatment safety; secondary outcomes included changes in symptoms, progression to severe COVID-19, incidence of long COVID, and recovery time.
RESULTS: No side effects or adverse events were reported from treatment and all patients experienced resolution of symptoms presumed to be associated with COVID-19 infection. One patient who had been ill for 28 days prior to presentation was hospitalized. Five patients had an illness duration of more than one month. Time to treatment was correlated with duration of illness post-treatment (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) and more symptoms at presentation was correlated with a longer duration of illness (r = 0.52, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective chart review, a multi-nutrient, herbal, and probiotic therapeutic approach for mild and moderate COVID-19 appeared to be well-tolerated. Delay in seeking treatment after symptom onset, as well as more symptoms at presentation, were correlated with a longer duration of illness. This treatment strategy may have clinical benefit, warranting prospective clinical trials with confirmed COVID-19 cases.

Introduction

COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to a pandemic resulting in nearly 4 million deaths globally to date and has resulted in chronic sequelae (‘long COVID’ or ‘post-COVID syndrome’) in 10–90% of those infected.1., 2., 3., 4., 5, 6 Multiple COVID-19 vaccines are now available internationally, however, several dilemmas remaining include: (1) vaccine availability and completion of the recommended vaccine schedule, (2) vaccine effectiveness in the immunocompromised, (3) vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 variants, (4) vaccine breakthrough infections, and (5) vaccine hesitancy.7, 8, 9 Those with weakened immune function, estimated at greater than 6% of the population, are less likely to respond to vaccination.10, 11, 12., 13., 14, 15 Therefore, there is still a need for therapeutic agents for COVID-19 infection.

Risk factors identified for developing severe COVID-19 infection include older age and comorbidities, including conditions associated with chronic systemic inflammation, such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. Prominent risk factors for long COVID include initial acute COVID-19 severity, presence of more than five early symptoms, and female sex.2., 3. Aside from COVID-19 vaccine development, there have been significant efforts dedicated to investigating drug treatment and some efforts dedicated to investigating natural therapeutics.16., 17., 18 In this retrospective chart review, we report on the clinical outcomes from a multi-nutrient, herbal, and probiotic treatment strategy designed to provide immune support and regulation, and therefore limit inflammation, in 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a rural, out-patient, naturopathic primary care setting. This report was completed for clinical quality improvement to evaluate current clinical practices supporting patients with COVID-19.

Methods

This retrospective chart review was prepared according to recent standardized guidelines.19, 20, 21., 22. The study population included the first thirty consecutive patients of any age diagnosed with mild and moderate COVID-19 who were provided multi-nutrient, herbal, and probiotic treatment in a rural, outpatient, naturopathic primary care setting between March 2020 and February 2021. There were no exclusion criteria to prevent selection bias. Illness severity was determined based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) treatment guidelines. Treatment was delivered by two licensed naturopathic physicians. Deidentified data was collected using a data abstraction instrument hosted on the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) platform.24, 25 The tool developed was a hybrid version of a prior case report data collection tool (CARE Capture) and a registry form designed to collect deidentified data on patients with COVID-19 treated with traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.26, 27 Collected information addressed the primary outcome of treatment safety and secondary outcomes including changes in symptoms, disease progression, incidence of long COVID, and recovery time. Microsoft Excel Version 2107 was used for analysis. Categorical data was summarized using frequency and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as means. Pearson correlations were calculated to evaluate if duration of illness was correlated with other variables including: presence of comorbid conditions, presence of five or more symptoms, and time to treatment. Because of the small number of patient cases, variable treatments, and heterogeneous duration of treatment, multivariable statistical modeling was not conducted. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive and exploratory.

Results

Patient information

Patients were predominantly female, Caucasian, and non-Hispanic with a mean age of 46. About one-third were from the Russian Orthodox community and 80% were longstanding patients ( Table 1). The most common presenting symptoms were fatigue, myalgia, dry cough, fever, chills, and dyspnea; 70% of patients had five or more symptoms at presentation (Table 1). Most patients had a symptom duration of 5 days or less before seeking treatment. Ninety-three percent had mild severity and 7% had moderate severity at presentation. One patient had been hospitalized for a myocardial infarction, community acquired pneumonia (CAP), and concurrent COVID-19 infection before establishing care.

Table 1

Patient demographic characteristics and clinical features.

Characteristic	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Age (mean ± SD) < 65 years old ≥ 65 years old	45.47 ± 22.13219	7030
Sex Male Female	1218	4060
Race and Ethnicity Caucasian Hispanic	303	10010
BMI (mean ± SD) (n = 24)	30.01 ± 11.55
Pregnant	1	3
Comorbidities	19	63
Vitamin D Status (mean ± SD) Lab normal (>30 ng/mL) Insufficient (20–30 ng/mL) Deficient (<20 ng/mL) Unknown	49.94 ± 12.23181110	603333
Most common symptoms at presentation Fatigue Myalgia Dry cough Fever (>38 °C) Chills Dyspnea Loss of taste or smell Sore throat	27241918181698	9080636060533027
Total number of symptoms at presentation < 5 symptoms ≥ 5 symptoms	921	3070

Sixty-three percent of the 30 patients had comorbid conditions, the most common included hypertension (30%), cardiovascular disease (17%), obesity (10%), and COPD with asthma (7%) (Table 1). One patient had a blood clotting disorder, one an autoimmune condition, and another was four months pregnant. Mean BMI was 30 (n = 24). Two patients had a history of tobacco use. Vitamin D status (serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol or 25-(OH)D) was sufficient (>30 ng/mL) for 60% of the patients, insufficient or deficient (<30 ng/mL) for 6%, and unknown for 33%. Mean 25(OH)D was 50 ng/mL (Table 1).

Due to the unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 global pandemic, modifications to routine practices were necessary. All patients provided consent to be seen via telehealth and/or in the clinic parking lot to reduce risk for COVID-19 transmission. Two patients were seen in person initially due to the absence of symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection.

Medications and supplements patients were taking at presentation are summarized in Table 2. The most common herbal supplement patients were taking at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis was the root of Curcuma longa or turmeric. Patients were taking dietary supplements for a wide array of health concerns, including cardiovascular and digestive complaints.

Table 2

Baseline medications and dietary supplements.

Category	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Taking medication	17	57
Taking dietary supplement	28	93
Medication	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) antihypertensive	4	13
Non-ACEI antihypertensive	4	13
Acetaminophen	4	13
Anti-asthma	4	13
Other cardiovascular	3	10
Antibiotic	3	10
Non-chloroquine antiviral	1	3
Lipid-lowering	1	3
Topical corticosteroid	1	3
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory	1	3
Central nervous system stimulant	1	3
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor	1	3
Antigout	1	3
Hormone replacement	1	3
Antihistamine	1	3
Antiglaucoma	1	3
Dietary Supplement	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Vitamin/mineral	26	87
Vitamin D	21	70
Omega 3 fatty acids	19	63
Herbal	17	57
Curcuma longa root	8	27
Probiotic	11	37
Amino acids	10	33
Digestive enzymes	6	20

Clinical findings and diagnostic assessment

There were limitations to physical examination due to the nature of virtual and parking lot visits. Approximately half of the patients had elevated blood pressure (n = 14) and seven had dyspnea and tachypnea (>20 respirations per minute, but <30 respirations per minute). No patients had tachycardia (>100 beats per minute) at the initial encounter. Due to the limited availability of testing kits in the United States (and internationally) at the time care was delivered and the virtual nature of some of the visits, not all patients were tested for COVID-19. Fifty-three percent (16 patients) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via single-test nasopharyngeal swab PCR, 43% (13 patients) were presumed positive due to symptom presentation and cohabitation with a confirmed positive case, and 3% (1 patient) was presumed positive due to symptom presentation alone. Access to testing kits improved by mid-June 2020.

Therapeutic intervention

There were no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatments for COVID-19 for outpatient settings at the time treatment was initiated for these 30 patients. Therefore, therapeutic agents known to (1) be involved in innate and adaptive immunity, (2) be supportive in respiratory infections, and (3) modulate inflammation (due to risk of hyperinflammation and coagulopathy from COVID-19) were identified and included in our treatment protocol ( Table 3). Treatment recommendations included dietary recommendations, oral dietary supplementation including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and an herbal tincture. Intravenous (IV) nutrient therapy was reserved for patients with moderate COVID-19 infection and/or comorbid conditions, including cardiovascular, metabolic, and pulmonary conditions. Treatment options were personalized to patients as needed (i.e., in the case of pregnancy, other medication use, and comorbid conditions). In November 2020, the FDA granted emergency use authorization for monoclonal antibody treatment for ambulatory patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at high risk for progression to severe disease. No patients fit this criterion when this therapy became available.

Table 3

Mild and moderate COVID-19 treatment protocol.

Diet
Food Item and Preparation	Dosing Regimen	Rationale and References
Bone Broth (homemade or store-bought; made from beef, elk, buffalo, and/or chicken bones)	½−1 cup 2 times daily until 3–5 days after symptom resolution	Bone broth contains immune-system supporting amino acids (i.e., arginine), minerals (i.e., selenium, magnesium)29., 30, and glutathione (GSH) precursors (GSH is involved in activation of T-lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes)31; has anti-inflammatory activity31., 32., 33.
Beetroot and Greens (steamed, roasted, or juiced)	¾−1 cup 2–3 times daily until 3–5 days after symptom resolution	Beetroot increases NO, which plays a role in the innate immune response in the airways and has bronchoprotective effects†34; is protective against oxidative stress and inflammation with potential to decrease vascular inflammation†35, 36, 37., 38, 39

Clinical evidence

For patients with moderate or severe symptom presentation and/or comorbid conditions

Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid): 1000 mg

Lemon bioflavonoid complex: 500 mg

Hesperidin: 50 mg

Rosa canina (rosehips) fruit: 50 mg

Rutin: 50 mg

Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol): 250 mcg/ 10,000 international units (IU)

Vitamin K1 (phytonadione USP): 20 mcg

Vitamin K2 (Menaquinone-7 or MK-7): 90 mcg

Zinc picolinate: 30 mg

Vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 10,000 IU (3000 mcg)

Vitamin E (as d-alpha- tocopherol) 1 IU

Lactobacillus rhamnosus

Bifidobacterium bifidum

Lactobacillus acidophilus

Lactobacillus casei

Lactobacillus plantarum

Lactobacillus salivarius

Bifidobacterium longum

Streptococcus thermophilus

Lactobacillus bulgaricus

Lactobacillus paracasei

Bifidobacterium lactis

Bifidobacterium breve

Inula helenium (Elecampane) (Professional Formulas): 1:1 Organic dried root extract

Ligusticum porteri (Osha) (Professional Formulas): 1:2 Wild-crafted dried root

Echinacea purpurea & Echinacea angustifolia (Echinacea) (Professional Formulas): 1:1 Organic & wild-crafted dried aerial parts & dried root extract

Mahonia aquifolium (Oregon grape) (Professional Formulas): 1:1 Wild-crafted dried root extract

Selected therapies targeted the following tiers of the naturopathic therapeutic order: addressing pathology and providing natural symptom relief while establishing the foundations for optimum health, stimulating self-healing, and supporting and restoring weakened systems ( Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

The therapeutic order of naturopathic medicine and treatment strategies for COVID-19.

For concurrent oral dietary supplementation, if patients were already taking the product or a combination product containing the constituent (e.g., vitamin D3), they were instructed to continue and adjust dosing as needed to follow the dosing listed in Table 3. One patient did not take the probiotic supplement as she had poor tolerance (i.e., probiotic supplementation historically led to side effects of abdominal cramping and bloating in this patient). The patient who was pregnant was not recommended high dose vitamin A dietary supplementation due to risk of teratogenicity.

Patients were recommended a commercial herbal product which included root of Echinacea purpurea, rhizome and rootlet of Hydrastis canadensis, root of Inula helenium, whole flowering plant of Spilanthes acmella, herb of Eriodictyon californicum, root of Armoracia rusticana, rhizome of Zingiber officinale, fruit of Sambucus nigra, flowering tops of Achillea millefolium, and root of Baptisia spp in 54–64% organic cane alcohol, distilled water, and vegetable glycerin (Rapid Immune Boost by Herb Pharm). If this product was unavailable, patients were offered an herbal formula with similar constituents (Table 3). Neither herbal formula was prescribed to the pregnant patient due to safety concerns.96, 97. As an alternative, the pregnant patient elected to consume the fruit of Sambucus nigra or elderberry, prepared as a syrup, dosed at 1903 mg three times daily. Fourteen patients were already taking herbs with antiviral properties at home and opted to take these instead. These herbs were part of encapsulated products, teas, syrups, and tinctures; the most common was a syrup of the fruit of Sambucus nigra (n = 6).

Before IV nutrient therapy was administered, patients were screened for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, which would have excluded them from receiving IV vitamin C. They were also screened for kidney disease and congestive heart failure. No patients had G6PD deficiency. One patient had chronic kidney disease (GFR was 56 mL/min/1.73 m2) and one patient was on warfarin therapy; both were dosed at the low end of the dose range for vitamin C (Table 3) and administered IV fluids over a longer time period (75–85 min vs. 60 min or less). The pregnant patient, who had a moderate symptom presentation, received IV nutrient therapy with the exception of zinc as she already had sufficient levels of zinc in her prenatal vitamin. Following guidelines from the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), no more than three ingredients were provided in each IV bag because no compounding hood (laminar airflow workbench) was available for use at the clinic (Table 3). The solution osmolarity ranged from 308 to 460 mOsm/L (isotonic to slightly hypertonic).

Prior to IV infusion, patients received instructions to eat, be well-hydrated, and urinate at home before coming to the clinic. After receiving patient consent, IV nutrients were delivered in the parking lot while the patient remained in the vehicle. Those who were IV “naive” were started at the low end of the dose range listed in Table 3. If they responded well to treatment, doses were titrated up with subsequent treatments. Patients received two to six IV treatments (up to four times per week) depending on how quickly symptoms resolved.

Two patients were prescribed oral antibiotics (azithromycin 500 mg for the first day and 250 mg for days two to five). The first patient was prescribed this regimen for a bacterial superinfection, after allergic rhinosinusitis, a few days prior to COVID-19 infection. The second patient prescribed azithromycin had signs and symptoms consistent with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 testing was not available at the time of presentation for this patient.

Prior to establishing care, the patient taking warfarin had been unable to receive a prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) by his primary care provider (PCP); lab error was suspected. No value was reported again with repeat testing. His PCP had prescribed him an antibiotic and antitussive medication which the patient was irregularly taking. This patient had been sick with COVID-19 for 28 days prior to presentation. He received IV nutrient therapy, however, he progressed to more severe infection and was referred to the emergency department (ED) four days later. At the ED, his SpO2 was 85%, his plasma prothrombin time was 67.9 s (reference range (RR) 11–13 s), INR 6.3 (RR 2.0–3.0 on warfarin therapy), and serum ferritin 5443 ng/mL (RR 24–336 ng/mL for males). He was hospitalized for seven days, received supplemental oxygen, and his warfarin dose was adjusted. He reinitiated treatment post-hospitalization. Another patient had previously been hospitalized for a myocardial infarction, CAP, and concurrent COVID-19 infection prior to establishing care; she remained outpatient during this episode of care.

Follow-up and outcomes

The length of follow-up from the initial visit at the time this manuscript was written was greater than one year for ten patients, nine months to less than one year for three patients, and six months to less than nine months for 17 patients. Therapy duration is listed in Table 3 and therapies utilized by patients are outlined in Table 4. One-half of patients experienced complete symptom resolution within ten days of initiating treatment (n = 15) ( Table 5). Two patients ended treatment prematurely, but resumed treatments for the recommended course when symptoms recurred. All patients eventually reported complete resolution of symptoms. There was no repeat SARS-CoV-2 testing. When questioned at follow-up visits, no patients reported side effects, including presentation of new or different symptoms, or adverse events from treatment. The pregnant patient had a full-term pregnancy and delivered a healthy infant without complications. This was her eighth pregnancy.

Table 4

Therapies utilized by patients from treatment protocol.

Therapy	Frequency	Percentage
Diet (bone broth and beets)	11	37
Dietary Supplement:
Vitamin C	30	100
Vitamin D3	29	97
Zinc	27	90
Vitamin A	14	47
Probiotics	26	87
Antiviral Herbal Product	30	100
Herbal Tincture (from clinic)	5	17
Rapid Immune Boost	10	33
Other herbal product	15	50
IV Nutrient Therapy
Magnesium	10	33
Vitamin C	10	33
Zinc	9	30
B6	10	33
B12	10	33

Table 5

Duration of illness.

Time Period	Time to TreatmentNo. of Patients (%)	Symptom Duration Post-TreatmentNo. of Patients (%)	Total Symptom DurationNo. of Patients (%)
0–3 days	21 (70)	0	0
4–6 days	2 (7)	7 (23)	5 (17)
7–10 days	4 (13)	8 (27)	5 (17)
11–14 days	0	5 (17)	7 (23)
>2 weeks to <3 weeks	1 (3)	3 (10)	4 (13)
3–4 weeks	2 (7)	3 (10)	4 (13)
>1 month and <3 months	0	2 (7)	3 (10)
3–6 months	0	1 (3)	1 (3)
>6 months and <1 year	0	1 (3)	1 (3)
	Time to Treatment(mean ± SD)	Symptom Duration Post-Treatment(mean ± SD)	Total Symptom Duration(mean ± SD)
No. of Days	4.1 ± 7.56	25.9 ± 52.47	30 ± 57.52

The patient on anticoagulant therapy was the only patient to be hospitalized and receive supplemental oxygen. Although, one patient had been hospitalized prior to establishing care. The patient on anticoagulant therapy had the longest duration of illness of 307 days before he had complete symptom resolution. No patients required intubation during this episode of care.

The five patients who had a recovery longer than one-month post-treatment included three patients who delayed treatment for more than two weeks after symptom onset (Table 5). Of these three patients who delayed treatment, two patients (including one patient who had COVID-19 pneumonia) had a lingering cough which eventually resolved. The third was the patient on anticoagulant therapy who was hospitalized; he experienced ongoing dyspnea on exertion and chest tightness. Cardiology work-up was unremarkable aside from recommending statin therapy for mildly elevated LDL. This patient’s symptoms resolved with repeat IV nutrient therapy. The remaining two patients experienced ongoing fatigue. One of these patients had been hospitalized for a myocardial infarction, CAP, and COVID-19 prior to this episode of care. When feeling better, she prematurely ended recommended treatment and when experiencing lingering fatigue, she completed treatment and the fatigue eventually resolved. The other patient with fatigue was pregnant and when diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia and treated, her fatigue resolved.

There was a strong positive correlation between time to treatment and duration of illness post-treatment (r = 0.63, p < 0.001), suggesting there may have been a treatment effect. This correlation no longer remained significant when removing from analysis the patients who delayed treatment for more than two weeks. The presence of five or more symptoms at presentation was correlated with a longer duration of illness (r = 0.52, p < 0.01). Duration of illness did not correlate with presence of comorbid conditions (r = 0.05, p = 0.81).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective chart review to report on a natural treatment strategy for mild to moderate COVID-19. Notable contributions of this retrospective, observational study of 30 consecutive patients with COVID-19 include presentation of a safe and well-tolerated treatment strategy for COVID-19 administered in an ambulatory setting. Based on patient risk factors (e.g., comorbid conditions), concomitant medication and dietary supplement use, and patient preference, our treatment protocol could be personalized to different patients. Patients with more complex disease (i.e., more symptoms at presentation), older patients, and patients with multiple comorbid conditions appeared to respond well to treatment. The ultimate resolution of symptoms in those who had a longer disease course with repeat treatment may suggest the ability to resolve "entrenched" illness. From the perspective of clinical quality improvement, the findings of this review support current practices, however, current practices could be further optimized by learning about the specific contributions of each component of the treatment protocol to the outcomes observed, which would take multiple clinical trials with large sample sizes. It is possible there was a synergistic effect between treatments.

Evidence suggests the coordinated response between innate and adaptive immunity, and a timely immune response, play a critical role in determining the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection.2., 98, 99, 100 Nutritional deficiencies can impair immune function and increase the risk for a more severe and chronic course of disease.30, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 101. Malnutrition has been noted in 26–45% of patients with COVID-19. A study of 50 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 revealed 76% were vitamin D deficient and 42% selenium deficient. Older age and comorbid conditions including cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome are risk factors for complications of COVID-19.2., 103 Interestingly, nutritional deficiencies have been reported in older individuals (>70 years of age) including vitamins C and E, and in patients with metabolic syndrome, with significantly lower plasma levels of A, C, E, and D when compared to healthy individuals. An ecological study demonstrated that intake levels of Vitamins D, C, B12, and iron are inversely associated with SARS-COV-2 incidence and mortality, particularly in populations genetically predisposed to lower micronutrient status. Therefore, our goal was to provide multi-nutrient treatment early in the course of disease.

In comparison to other recently published studies and protocols recommending natural approaches, the protocol used herein was similar in many ways including use of dietary factors and supplements (e.g., zinc and vitamin D), concurrent use of oral and IV vitamin C, and botanical herbs with immunomodulatory effects.100, 105., 106, 107, 108, 109., 110, 111, 112., 113, 114, 115, 116 Some ways our protocol deviated from what has been published include administration of IV nutrient therapy in an outpatient setting, exclusion of pharmaceutical medications unless indicated for concurrent infection (e.g., CAP), and use of probiotics. IV nutrient therapy in other studies has largely been reserved for patients who are severely ill, in the ICU, and on FiO2; in contrast, IV nutrient therapy was administered preemptively to those with moderate COVID-19 and risk factors for progression to severe disease. Due to the risk for hyperinflammation from SARS-Co-V-2 infection, we included probiotic and herbal agents with virucidal properties and agents that have been shown to demonstrate promotion of a more immediate immune response and control inflammation. A proposed mechanism for a hyperinflammatory response is the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to inhibit and delay the type 1 interferon (IFN) responses in infected cells, which leads to the triggering of a more “exuberant immune response” as the immune system essentially tries to catch up. This impaired early type 1 IFN response is likely a predictor of acute COVID-19 severity; therefore, this was a therapeutic target.

Most therapies for COVID-19 have been symptomatic supportive care.112., 117 Strengths of our treatment approach to COVID-19 include addressing risk factors and etiologies associated with progression to a more severe disease state and chronic sequelae. IV nutrient therapy was offered in an out-patient setting to patients with risk factors and moderate presentation instead of waiting for progression to more severe disease. In theory, if one nutrient were to be deficient, this could serve as a “linchpin” and lead to an ineffective or dysregulated immune response. Our therapeutic approach was comprehensive and employed multiple nutrients, herbs, and probiotics. No side effects or adverse events from treatment were reported. After receiving patient consent, patients were managed via telemedicine and in the clinic parking lot to prevent transmission in the clinic.

A limitation to this study includes reporting on a small sample of patients and thus observations may not be representative of the general population. Patients also had varying durations of illness at presentation. Treatment for patients with severe COVID-19 infection was not within the scope of this review, as this was a primary care out-patient setting. Not all patients were able to be tested due to limited test kit availability in the United States until mid-June 2020. Therefore, some patients were presumed positive based on symptom presentation and cohabitation with a confirmed positive case. The commercial combination herbal product also had limited availability. Due to the comprehensive treatment approach and with no comparison or control groups, we cannot determine which treatment(s) had the greatest bearing on outcomes. Many of the patients were also already on pharmaceutical and dietary supplements prior to this episode of care. Patient characteristics (i.e., those who seek naturopathic medical care, take dietary supplements, etc.) may have also accounted for responses observed. No conclusions can be made about causation based on this chart review. Because patients were managed via a telemedicine capacity and in the clinic parking lot, physical exams and monitoring laboratory biomarkers were limited.

Based on the results of these cases, we hypothesize if acute COVID-19 infection is treated at first onset with nutrients known to be essential to immune function and probiotics and herbs with immunomodulatory and antiviral activity, this approach could lead to a more rapid clearance of COVID-19, prevent progression to severe disease, as well as the development of chronic sequelae. Future directions include investigating a more comprehensive treatment strategy for confirmed COVID-19 cases in the early symptomatic stages. Because we do not have sophisticated means to readily risk stratify all patients (e.g., including testing for nutrient deficiencies), investigating treatments options that have “safety margins superior to those of reference drugs and enough levels of evidence” should be a priority.

Conclusions

This retrospective chart review describes complete resolution of mild and moderate symptoms presumed to be associated with COVID-19 infection in 30 patients treated with multi-nutrient, probiotic, and herbal therapies. This comprehensive treatment approach appeared to be safe. Delay in seeking treatment after symptom onset, as well as more symptoms at presentation, were correlated with a longer duration of illness. Prospective clinical trials with confirmed COVID-19 cases are warranted.

Patient Perspectives

“[Treatment] really helped with the shortness of breath. While… sick, there were times that I don’t remember much. I had shortness of breath, loss of taste and smell, fatigue, and sinus headaches. The fatigue lasted for weeks. Eventually I regained all of my sense of taste and smell… [and] had no lingering symptoms except fatigue, which eventually dissipated.”

"[I had] no side effects to the treatment, I felt great with the treatment. When I got sick, I recovered fine.”

“[I] loved getting IV treatment when feeling run down."

Funding

This research utilized REDCap which is supported by grant UL1 TR000445 from the (NCATS) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Melissa S. Barber: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, and edited of the manuscript. Richard Barrett: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, and drafted and editing the manuscript. Ryan D. Bradley: Formal analysis, Methodology, and editing of the manuscript. Erin Walker: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, and editing of the manuscript. All authors critically viewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors M.S.B., R.B., R.D.B, and E.W. have no competing interests to declare.