Literature DB >> 20703453

Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow velocity as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect.

Deok Young Choi1, Hyun Jeong Kwak, Hee Yeon Park, Yong Beom Kim, Chang Hyu Choi, Ji Yeon Lee.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare respiratory variation in transthoracic echo-derived aortic blood flow velocity (∆Vpeak) and inferior vena cava diameter (∆IVCD) with central venous pressure (CVP) as predictors of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD). A prospective study conducted in pediatric intensive care unit investigated 21 mechanically ventilated children who had undergone repair of VSD. Standardized volume replacement (VR) was the intervention used. Hemodynamic measurements including CVP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, transthoracic echo-derived stroke volume (SV), cardiac output, ∆Vpeak, and ∆IVCD were performed 1 h after patient arrival in the intensive care unit. Hemodynamic measurements were repeated 10 min after VR by an infusion of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (10 ml/kg) over 20 min. The volume-induced increase in the SV was 15% or more in 11 patients (responders) and less than 15% in 10 patients (nonresponders). Before volume replacement, the ∆Vpeak (23.1 ± 5.7% vs. 14.0 ± 7.7%; p = 0.006) and ∆IVCD (26.5 ± 16.2% vs. 9.2 ± 9.1%; p = 0.008) was higher in the responders than in the nonresponders, whereas CVP did not significantly differ between the two groups. The prediction of fluid responsiveness was higher with the ΔVpeak, as shown by a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.00; p = 0.01), a ΔIVCD of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00; p = 0.01), and a CVP of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22-0.73; nonsignificant difference). The ∆Vpeak and ∆IVCD measured by transthoracic echocardiography can predict the response of SV after volume expansion in mechanically ventilated children at completion of VSD repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703453     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-010-9776-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  14 in total

1.  Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock.

Authors:  M Feissel; F Michard; I Mangin; O Ruyer; J P Faller; J L Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Are transoesophageal Doppler parameters a reliable guide to paediatric haemodynamic status and fluid management?

Authors:  S M Tibby; M Hatherill; A Durward; I A Murdoch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Daniel A Reuter; Julian Bayerlein; Matthias S G Goepfert; Florian C Weis; Erich Kilger; Peter Lamm; Alwin E Goetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Ramon Anel; Eugene Bunnell; Kalim Habet; Sergio Zanotti; Stephanie Marshall; Alex Neumann; Amjad Ali; Mary Cheang; Clifford Kavinsky; Joseph E Parrillo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Jean M Carlet; Henry Masur; Herwig Gerlach; Thierry Calandra; Jonathan Cohen; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Didier Keh; John C Marshall; Margaret M Parker; Graham Ramsay; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients?

Authors:  Stéphane Soubrier; Fabienne Saulnier; Hervé Hubert; Pierre Delour; Hélène Lenci; Thierry Onimus; Saad Nseir; Alain Durocher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Frédéric Michard; Jean-Pierre Faller; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated children.

Authors:  Philippe Durand; Laurent Chevret; Sandrine Essouri; Vincent Haas; Denis Devictor
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  24 in total

1.  Pulse oximeter plethysmograph variation and its relationship to the arterial waveform in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  J R Chandler; E Cooke; C Petersen; W Karlen; N Froese; J Lim; J M Ansermino
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery After Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Isabella Favia; Stefano Romagnoli; Luca Di Chiara; Zaccaria Ricci
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Fact and controversies when assessing fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A comprehensive study of clinical biomarkers, use of inotropic medications and fluid resuscitation in newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Janardhan Mydam; Marwan Zidan; Nitin Shashikant Chouthai
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in children undergoing neurosurgery under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kavita G Morparia; Srijaya K Reddy; Laura J Olivieri; Michael C Spaeder; Jennifer J Schuette
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Infants Undergoing Ventricular Septal Defect Repair with Median Sternotomy or Minimally Invasive Right Thoracotomy.

Authors:  Ding Han; Ya-Guang Liu; Yi Luo; Jia Li; Chuan Ou-Yang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Chang Hyu Choi; Hong Soon Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Association of postoperative fluid overload with adverse outcomes after congenital heart surgery: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Bellos; Dimitrios C Iliopoulos; Despina N Perrea
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  The evolution of cardiac point of care ultrasound for the neonatologist.

Authors:  Yogen Singh; Shazia Bhombal; Anup Katheria; Cecile Tissot; María V Fraga
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Novel Method of Calculating Pulse Pressure Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness to Transfusion in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

Authors:  Zachary C Foughty; Onur Tavaslioglu; Christopher J Rhee; Leah I Elizondo; Craig G Rusin; Daniel J Penny; Sebastian Acosta; Danielle R Rios
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.