| Literature DB >> 27834063 |
Hyun Jeong Kim1, Misuk Ji2, Junghan Song3, Hee Won Moon4, Mina Hur4, Yeo Min Yun5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The associations of vitamin D deficiency with various clinical conditions highlighted the importance of vitamin D testing. Currently, clinicians measure only the total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration, regardless of its bioavailability. We aimed to determine the effect of vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) on 25(OH)D bioavailability.Entities:
Keywords: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Bioavailability; Vitamin D-binding protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27834063 PMCID: PMC5107615 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.1.34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Lab Med ISSN: 2234-3806 Impact factor: 3.464
Patient demographics for the three study groups
| Healthy controls (N=60) | ICU patients (N=50) | Pregnant women (N=50) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female (N, %) | 36 (60) | 16 (32) | 50 (100) | < 0.0001 |
| Age (yr)* | 46.1 ± 11.3 | 57.3 ± 15.0 | 32.6 ± 3.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Albumin (g/dL)* | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | < 0.0001 |
*Values were presented as mean±standard deviation; †P values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney test for age and albumin concentrations and the Fisher's exact test for the number of female.
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.
Fig. 1Comparison of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D in the three study groups. (A) The total 25(OH)D level in intensive care unit (ICU) patients (median, interquartile range: 11.65, 7.86-14.87 ng/mL) was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (18.25, 13.48-23.78 ng/mL) or in pregnant women (18.25, 13.98-25.24 ng/mL). (B) The VDBP level in pregnant women (225.01, 130.24-422.92 µg/mL) was significantly higher, and the VDBP level in ICU patients (95.58, 61.15-167.34 µg/mL) was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (167.18, 105.99-257.70 µg/mL). (C) The calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels of ICU patients (1.97, 1.48-3.15 ng/mL) and pregnant women (1.93, 1.03-3.41 ng/mL) were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (2.56, 1.95-4.22 ng/mL). P values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney test. Two dashed lines denote vitamin D deficiency and severe vitamin D deficiency. The arrowheads and dots represent the outside value (>1.5× interquartile ranges) and far-out value (>3× interquartile ranges), respectively. The horizontal lines represent maximum and minimum values, except for the outside value and far-out value.
Fig. 2Comparison of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), and calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D by gestational stage. (A) Total 25(OH)D levels were not significantly different between the 1st and 2nd and 3rd trimesters (median, interquartile range: 1st trimester: 18.20, 15.07-23.87 ng/mL; 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 18.30, 13.75-25.70 ng/mL). (B) VDBP levels during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters were significantly higher than those during the 1st trimester (1st trimester: 102.20, 84.75-259.90 µg/mL, 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 273.65, 163.75-453.98 µg/mL). (C) The calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D level in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters was significantly lower than that in the 1st trimester (1st trimester: 4.19, 2.09-5.67 ng/mL; 2nd and 3rd trimesters, 1.73, 0.90-2.43 ng/mL). P values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney test. Two dashed lines denote vitamin D deficiency and severe vitamin D deficiency. The arrowheads and dots represent the outside value (>1.5× interquartile ranges) and far-out value (>3× interquartile ranges), respectively. The horizontal lines represent the maximum and minimum values, except for the outside value and far-out value.