Literature DB >> 27834063

Clinical Utility of Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein and Calculation of Bioavailable Vitamin D in Assessment of Vitamin D Status.

Hyun Jeong Kim1, Misuk Ji2, Junghan Song3, Hee Won Moon4, Mina Hur4, Yeo Min Yun5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The associations of vitamin D deficiency with various clinical conditions highlighted the importance of vitamin D testing. Currently, clinicians measure only the total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration, regardless of its bioavailability. We aimed to determine the effect of vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) on 25(OH)D bioavailability.
METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 60 healthy controls, 50 pregnant women, and 50 patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Total 25(OH)D was quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and VDBP levels were determined by using an ELISA kit (R&D Systems, USA). The bioavailable 25(OH)D levels were calculated by using total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin concentrations.
RESULTS: In comparison with healthy controls, the total 25(OH)D concentration was significantly lower in ICU patients (median, 11.65 vs 18.25 ng/mL; P<0.00001), but no significant difference was noted between pregnant women (18.25 ng/mL) and healthy controls. The VDBP level was significantly lower in ICU patients (95.58 vs 167.18 μg/mL, P=0.0002) and higher in pregnant women (225.01 vs 167.18 μg/mL, P=0.008) compared with healthy controls. Nonetheless, the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels of ICU patients and pregnant women were significantly lower than those of healthy controls (1.97 and 1.93 ng/mL vs 2.56 ng/mL; P=0.0073 and 0.0027).
CONCLUSIONS: A single marker of the total 25(OH)D level is not sufficient to accurately evaluate vitamin D status, especially in pregnant women. In cases where VDBP concentrations may be altered, VDBP measurements and bioavailable 25(OH)D calculations may help to determine vitamin D status accurately.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Bioavailability; Vitamin D-binding protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27834063      PMCID: PMC5107615          DOI: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Lab Med        ISSN: 2234-3806            Impact factor:   3.464


INTRODUCTION

Humans can acquire vitamin D from exposure to sunlight and dietary intake. Acquired vitamin D is metabolized in the liver, resulting in 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] [12]. Most (85-90%) of the circulating 25(OH)D is tightly bound to vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), with a smaller amount (10-15%) loosely bound to albumin. Less than 1% of circulating vitamin D exists in a free unbound form [345]. The fraction not bound to VDBP (free and albumin-bound forms) is considered bioavailable 25(OH)D [3]. VDBP, a 58-kDa protein, is produced in the liver and circulates in plasma. VDBP levels increase by up to 50% in a high-estrogen state, such as pregnancy, and decrease in certain disease states, such as severe hepatic disease [6789]. Moreover, VDBP has a high rate of polymorphism, and differences in affinity for 25(OH)D have been reported [10]. Vitamin D deficiency is defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration less than 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) [211]. Several studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency correlates with various clinical conditions and parameters, including osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases, schizophrenia, surgical outcomes, and cancer risk [1213141516171819]. Nonetheless, the causality is still unproven. Because vitamin D bioavailability is linked to various conditions, accurate assessment of vitamin D status has become important for effective treatment. Currently, most clinicians determine total 25(OH)D levels as a measure of the reservoir of vitamin D. However, the exact bioavailability of vitamin D is not known by this method. Our aim was to test whether VDBP quantification and calculation of bioavailable vitamin D are helpful in the assessment of vitamin D status in patients likely to have altered VDBP levels, including pregnant women and patients in intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

1. Clinical samples

This was a prospective study conducted in Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Serum samples were collected from 160 patients between March and September 2014. The 160 enrolled patients were categorized as healthy controls (n=60), ICU patients (n=50), or pregnant women (n=50) [8]. The healthy controls were defined as people who visited a health care institution only for the health screenings and did not have any symptoms. All the ICU patients included in this study had been admitted for postoperative care only. Pregnant women who had no medical problems were recruited, and those with twins or triplets were excluded. Shao et al [20] discovered the significant difference in parathyroid hormone and calcium levels between early and late stages of pregnancy. To evaluate the differences by pregnancy stage, the group of pregnant women was subdivided into two subgroups; 1st and 2nd/3rd trimesters. In all three groups, patients who had other medical problems or took medications were excluded. Table 1 shows the demographics of the three study groups. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Konkuk University Medical Center (KUH1200040).
Table 1

Patient demographics for the three study groups

Healthy controls (N=60)ICU patients (N=50)Pregnant women (N=50)P value
Female (N, %)36 (60)16 (32)50 (100)< 0.0001
Age (yr)*46.1 ± 11.357.3 ± 15.032.6 ± 3.6< 0.0001
Albumin (g/dL)*4.2 ± 0.33.7 ± 0.63.1 ± 0.5< 0.0001

*Values were presented as mean±standard deviation; †P values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney test for age and albumin concentrations and the Fisher's exact test for the number of female.

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

2. Study design

Each serum sample was aliquoted into two tubes and stored at -80℃ until they could be analyzed for VDBP and total 25(OH)D. Concentrations of VDBP were measured by using Human Vitamin D BP Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 concentrations were measured by using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). LC-MS/MS was regarded as a reference method and was performed at a College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory. The D2 and D3 values were added up to determine total 25(OH)D. The coefficients of variation of D2 and D3 measured by LC-MS/MS were as follows; D2: 4.2% for a low level, 3.8% for a high level; D3: 4.0% for a low level, 3.5% for a high level. Serum albumin levels were measured by using an enzymatic colorimetric method with a TBA-200FR (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). The levels of bioavailable 25(OH)D were calculated from total measured 25(OH)D, VDBP, and serum albumin concentrations by using the following equations [48]: a = b = c = − 25(

3. Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as median [interquartile range] or mean± standard deviation. Total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D were compared among healthy controls, ICU patients, and pregnant women by using the Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pairwise comparisons. To compare total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D by gestational stage, the Mann-Whitney test was used. For categorical variables, the Fisher's exact test was used. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Analyse-it software, version 3.90.5 (Analyse-it Software Ltd., Leeds, UK) and MedCalc software, version 15.2.2 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Differences with P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

ICU patients had total 25(OH)D levels (median, interquartile range: 11.65, 7.86-14.87 ng/mL; SI unit, nmol/L; conversion factor, 2.496) that were significantly lower than those of healthy controls (18.25, 13.48-23.78 ng/mL; P<0.0001) and pregnant women (18.25, 13.98-25.24 ng/mL; P<0.0001; Fig. 1A). The VDBP level of pregnant women (225.01, 130.24-422.92 µg/mL) was significantly higher than that of healthy controls (167.18, 105.99-257.70 µg/mL, P=0.008), while the VDBP level of ICU patients (95.58, 61.15-167.34 µg/mL, P=0.0002) was significantly lower than that of healthy controls (Fig. 1B). Finally, the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels in ICU patients (1.97, 1.48-3.15 ng/mL, P=0.0073) and pregnant women (1.93, 1.03-3.41 ng/mL, P=0.0027) were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (2.56, 1.95-4.22 ng/mL; Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1

Comparison of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D in the three study groups. (A) The total 25(OH)D level in intensive care unit (ICU) patients (median, interquartile range: 11.65, 7.86-14.87 ng/mL) was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (18.25, 13.48-23.78 ng/mL) or in pregnant women (18.25, 13.98-25.24 ng/mL). (B) The VDBP level in pregnant women (225.01, 130.24-422.92 µg/mL) was significantly higher, and the VDBP level in ICU patients (95.58, 61.15-167.34 µg/mL) was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (167.18, 105.99-257.70 µg/mL). (C) The calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels of ICU patients (1.97, 1.48-3.15 ng/mL) and pregnant women (1.93, 1.03-3.41 ng/mL) were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (2.56, 1.95-4.22 ng/mL). P values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney test. Two dashed lines denote vitamin D deficiency and severe vitamin D deficiency. The arrowheads and dots represent the outside value (>1.5× interquartile ranges) and far-out value (>3× interquartile ranges), respectively. The horizontal lines represent maximum and minimum values, except for the outside value and far-out value.

In pregnant women, the total 25(OH)D levels were not significantly different between the 1st trimester and the 2nd and 3rd trimesters (1st trimester: 18.20, 15.07-23.87 ng/mL, 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 18.30, 13.75-25.70 ng/mL; Fig. 2A). In contrast, VDBP levels during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters were significantly higher than those in the 1st trimester (1st trimester: 102.20, 84.75-259.90 µg/mL, 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 273.65, 163.75-453.98 µg/mL, P=0.0033; Fig. 2B). Thus, the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D level in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy was significantly lower than that in the 1st trimester (1st trimester: 4.19, 2.09-5.67 ng/mL, 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 1.73, 0.90-2.43 ng/mL, P=0.0031; Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2

Comparison of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), and calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D by gestational stage. (A) Total 25(OH)D levels were not significantly different between the 1st and 2nd and 3rd trimesters (median, interquartile range: 1st trimester: 18.20, 15.07-23.87 ng/mL; 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 18.30, 13.75-25.70 ng/mL). (B) VDBP levels during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters were significantly higher than those during the 1st trimester (1st trimester: 102.20, 84.75-259.90 µg/mL, 2nd and 3rd trimesters: 273.65, 163.75-453.98 µg/mL). (C) The calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D level in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters was significantly lower than that in the 1st trimester (1st trimester: 4.19, 2.09-5.67 ng/mL; 2nd and 3rd trimesters, 1.73, 0.90-2.43 ng/mL). P values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney test. Two dashed lines denote vitamin D deficiency and severe vitamin D deficiency. The arrowheads and dots represent the outside value (>1.5× interquartile ranges) and far-out value (>3× interquartile ranges), respectively. The horizontal lines represent the maximum and minimum values, except for the outside value and far-out value.

DISCUSSION

Correlations between vitamin D deficiency and a variety of clinical conditions have been reported in numerous studies [1112131415161718]. Vitamin D deficiency is defined as total 25(OH)D concentration less than 20 ng/mL, regardless of its bioavailability. Because VDBP levels can be altered by changes in estrogen levels or by hepatic diseases, the actual vitamin D status may have a different relation with the total 25(OH)D concentration in patients with abnormal VDBP level [6792122]. However, there are no studies on the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels in pregnant women and ICU patients with changed VDBP level. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D from VDBP measurements for estimation of vitamin D status in ICU patients without hepatic diseases, in pregnant women, and in healthy controls. The mean total 25(OH)D concentration of the healthy control group was 19.26 ng/mL, and 36 of 60 individuals in this group (60%) received a diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency. This result suggests that vitamin D deficiency is common among city dwellers, even in the presumably healthy population without apparent diseases. The mean VDBP level of the group of ICU patients was significantly lower than that of the healthy control group. This result suggests that VDBP production may be reduced during postoperative care, even in the absence of hepatic disease. Heijboer et al [8] discovered decreased VDBP levels in ICU patients, compared with healthy individuals. In the present study, ICU patients also showed median total 25(OH)D and VDBP levels that are significantly lower than those in the control group individuals. Depending on the degree of VDBP downregulation, bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations may increase or decrease, theoretically. As a result, total 25(OH)D is not sufficient as a single marker of vitamin D status. The pregnant group showed a median total 25(OH)D level comparable to that of the healthy control group. Nonetheless, the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D level in pregnant women was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (Fig. 1). These results suggest that vitamin D deficiency may be overlooked in pregnant women, if only the total 25(OH)D level is measured. Moreover, the possibility of misdiagnosis would be higher during the 2nd and 3rd trimester, as the bioavailable 25(OH)D decreases (Fig. 2). There are some limitations in this study. First, the difference in affinity of VDBP for 25(OH)D, which results from genetic variations, was not taken into account in our calculation of 25(OH)D bioavailability [8922]. Second, patients with hepatic diseases were not included. Third, the reference range for the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D was not established. Fourth, there were statistically significant differences in age, gender, and albumin levels among our groups (Table 1). Because young age and female sex are associated with high VDBP levels [2324] and the bioavailable 25(OH)D calculation includes the albumin level, our results on the differences in VDBP levels and in the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels among the groups could be affected by these differences in characteristics of the study subjects. Nonetheless, the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D may reflect the status of VDBP levels and the albumin levels in each patient; therefore, calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D could be used to assess vitamin D status accurately in the patients with altered VDBP levels or albumin levels. Fifth, the concentration of VDBP can be measured only by an ELISA kit, making commercial application potentially challenging. Sixth, we could not measure the levels of calcium, parathyroid hormone, and creatinine because of sample volume limitations. It should be noted that Shao et al [20] found significantly higher parathyroid hormone and lower calcium levels at the late pregnancy stage (32.01±3.45 weeks) in comparison with the early pregnancy stage (16.09±2.65 weeks). This result seems to be consistent with the relatively prominent vitamin D deficiency in women at the late stage of pregnancy. Seventh, we could not verify the VDBP concentration by a second method. Because the median value of VDBP concentration (167.18 µg/mL) in the healthy controls (composed of Asian people in our study) was found to be similar to that in American Blacks (mean±SE: 168±3 µg/mL) in another study [22], and allele frequencies of the VDBP (GC) polymorphism in keratinized (yellowish) skin type are closer to those in pigmented (black) than those in fair-skinned populations [25], we assumed that there were no major errors in VDBP measurement. Because quantification of VDBP and free 25(OH)D is widely available to practitioners in current clinical practice, further studies and the assays/calculations improvements should be performed to address the above limitations. In conclusion, a single marker of total 25(OH)D levels has long been used to evaluate vitamin D status in patients. This measure, however, is not sufficient to accurately evaluate a patient's vitamin D status, especially that of pregnant women. In cohorts of patients with altered VDBP concentrations, such as pregnant women or ICU patients, VDBP testing and bioavailable 25(OH)D calculations would provide a more accurate assessment of vitamin D status.
  25 in total

1.  The relationship between vitamin D and cancer.

Authors:  Denise Mitchell
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 2.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A comparison of measured and calculated free 25(OH) vitamin D levels in clinical populations.

Authors:  J B Schwartz; J Lai; B Lizaola; L Kane; S Markova; P Weyland; N A Terrault; N Stotland; D Bikle
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Long-term trends in sunshine duration and its association with schizophrenia birth rates and age at first registration--data from Australia and the Netherlands.

Authors:  John McGrath; Jean-Paul Selten; David Chant
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin D.

Authors:  Hector F DeLuca
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in serum from normal subjects, pregnant subjects, and subjects with liver disease.

Authors:  D D Bikle; E Gee; B Halloran; J G Haddad
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joan M Lappe; Dianne Travers-Gustafson; K Michael Davies; Robert R Recker; Robert P Heaney
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Affinity differences for vitamin D metabolites associated with the genetic isoforms of the human serum carrier protein (DBP).

Authors:  J Arnaud; J Constans
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Bioavailable vitamin D is more tightly linked to mineral metabolism than total vitamin D in incident hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Ishir Bhan; Camille E Powe; Anders H Berg; Elizabeth Ankers; Julia B Wenger; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi I Thadhani
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Vitamin D, the autonomic nervous system, and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Michelle Catherine Mann; Morley D Hollenberg; David A Hanley; Sofia B Ahmed
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-04
View more
  11 in total

1.  Alterations in circulating levels of vitamin D binding protein, total and bioavailability of vitamin D in diabetic retinopathy patients.

Authors:  Zhila Maghbooli; Sepideh Ebrahimi Meimand; Ali-Asghar Malek Hosseini; Arash Shirvani
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 2.  Vitamin D-Binding Protein in Pregnancy and Reproductive Health.

Authors:  Melinda Fernando; Stacey J Ellery; Clara Marquina; Siew Lim; Negar Naderpoor; Aya Mousa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Clinical Usefulness of Bioavailable Vitamin D and Impact of GC Genotyping on the Determination of Bioavailable Vitamin D in a Korean Population.

Authors:  Hyun-Young Kim; Jin Hyun Kim; Myeong Hee Jung; In Ae Cho; Youngjin Kim; Min-Chul Cho
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 3.257

4.  Multiple Sclerosis Patients Show Lower Bioavailable 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D, but No Difference in Ratio of 25(OH)D/24,25(OH)2D and FGF23 Concentrations.

Authors:  Mariska C Vlot; Laura Boekel; Jolijn Kragt; Joep Killestein; Barbara M van Amerongen; Robert de Jonge; Martin den Heijer; Annemieke C Heijboer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Total vs. Bioavailable: Determining a Better 25(OH)D Index in Association with Bone Density and Muscle Mass in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Nurdiana Z Abidin; Soma R Mitra
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-12-31

6.  Opposite correlation of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D- and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D-metabolites with gestational age, bone- and lipid-biomarkers in pregnant women.

Authors:  Oleg Tsuprykov; Saban Elitok; Claudia Buse; Chang Chu; Bernhard Karl Krämer; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Could Vitamin D Be Effective in Prevention of Preeclampsia?

Authors:  Elżbieta Poniedziałek-Czajkowska; Radzisław Mierzyński
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Vitamin D: Current Challenges between the Laboratory and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ludmila Máčová; Marie Bičíková
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Alterations in the vitamin D endocrine system during pregnancy: A longitudinal study of 855 healthy Norwegian women.

Authors:  Miriam K Gustafsson; Pål R Romundstad; Signe Nilssen Stafne; Anne-Sofie Helvik; Astrid Kamilla Stunes; Siv Mørkved; Kjell Åsmund Salvesen; Per Medbøe Thorsby; Unni Syversen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of Vitamin D Fractions in Obese Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Marta Pelczyńska; Teresa Grzelak; Marcelina Sperling; Matylda Kręgielska-Narożna; Paweł Bogdański; Krystyna Czyżewska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.