Literature DB >> 33479299

Opposite correlation of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D- and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D-metabolites with gestational age, bone- and lipid-biomarkers in pregnant women.

Oleg Tsuprykov1,2, Saban Elitok2, Claudia Buse2,3, Chang Chu2, Bernhard Karl Krämer2, Berthold Hocher4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) need to be bound to carrier proteins to be transported to their target cells. The majority of either 25OHD or 1,25(OH)2D is bound to vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), a smaller fraction is bound to albumin and only very small amounts of 25OHD or 1,25(OH)2D are free. Albumin-bound 25OHD or 1,25(OH)2D is relatively easily available after dissociation from albumin. Thus, the sum of free and albumin-bound forms is called bioavailable 25OHD and bioavailable 1,25(OH)2D. Total 25OHD and 1,25(OH)2D are defined as the sum of free, albumin-bound and DBP-bound 25OHD and 1,25(OH)2D, respectively. This cross-sectional study in 427 pregnant women compared the correlation of the six vitamin D compounds with biomarkers of bone health, lipid metabolism, kidney function, endocrine parameters, and group B water-soluble vitamins. Among the 25OHD metabolites analysed, total 1,25(OH)2D showed clearly the best correlation with calcium, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, adiponectin, LDL, HDL, urea, thyroxine, and group B water-soluble vitamins. When comparing the three 25OHD metabolites, both free 25OHD and bioavailable 25OHD showed overall good correlations with calcium, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, adiponectin, LDL, HDL, urea, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and group B water-soluble vitamins, The correlations of 1,25(OH)2D and 25OHD metabolites went always in opposite directions. Only PTH correlates always inversely with all six vitamin D compounds. In conclusion, free 25(OH)D and bioavailable 25(OH)D are more precise determinants of the vitamin D status than total 25(OH)D in normal pregnancy, whereas total 1,25(OH)2D is superior to free and bioavailable 1,25(OH)2D. Except for PTH, correlations of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D metabolites with typical clinical chemistry readouts go in opposite directions.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33479299      PMCID: PMC7820257          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81452-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  34 in total

Review 1.  Variability in free 25(OH) vitamin D levels in clinical populations.

Authors:  J B Schwartz; J Lai; B Lizaola; L Kane; P Weyland; N A Terrault; N Stotland; D Bikle
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.292

2.  Comparative affinity of the major genetic variants of human group-specific component (vitamin D-binding protein) for 25-(OH) vitamin D.

Authors:  B Boutin; R M Galbraith; P Arnaud
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.292

3.  Vitamin D-Binding Protein Concentrations Quantified by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Andrew N Hoofnagle; John H Eckfeldt; Pamela L Lutsey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  First trimester vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and subsequent preeclampsia.

Authors:  Camille E Powe; Ellen W Seely; Sarosh Rana; Ishir Bhan; Jeffrey Ecker; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi Thadhani
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Reference intervals for measured and calculated free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Oleg Tsuprykov; Claudia Buse; Roman Skoblo; Afrozul Haq; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.292

6.  Comparison of free and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D in normal human pregnancy.

Authors:  Oleg Tsuprykov; Claudia Buse; Roman Skoblo; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.292

7.  Free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in serum from normal subjects, pregnant subjects, and subjects with liver disease.

Authors:  D D Bikle; E Gee; B Halloran; J G Haddad
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Affinity differences for vitamin D metabolites associated with the genetic isoforms of the human serum carrier protein (DBP).

Authors:  J Arnaud; J Constans
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Influence of the vitamin D-binding protein on the serum concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Significance of the free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 concentration.

Authors:  R Bouillon; F A Van Assche; H Van Baelen; W Heyns; P De Moor
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  Vitamin D Binding Protein: A Historic Overview.

Authors:  Roger Bouillon; Frans Schuit; Leen Antonio; Fraydoon Rastinejad
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Oral and Topical Vitamin D, Sunshine, and UVB Phototherapy Safely Control Psoriasis in Patients with Normal Pretreatment Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations: A Literature Review and Discussion of Health Implications.

Authors:  Patrick J McCullough; William P McCullough; Douglas Lehrer; Jeffrey B Travers; Steven J Repas
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  25(OH)VitD and human endocrine and functional fertility parameters in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Mei Tian; Suimin Zeng; Sufen Cai; Christoph Reichetzeder; Xiaoli Zhang; Chenjun Yin; Weihong Kuang; Kexin Cheng; Yao Jiang; Mingqiu Tao; Yuan Zeng; Ge Lin; Jian Li; Fei Gong; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Towards harmonization of directly measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  Christopher T Sempos; Ernst Lindhout; Nicolas Heureux; Michel Hars; Damon A Parkington; Emily Dennison; Ramón Durazo-Arvizu; Kerry S Jones; Stephen A Wise
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.478

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.