Literature DB >> 27832600

Visual search for object categories is predicted by the representational architecture of high-level visual cortex.

Michael A Cohen1, George A Alvarez2, Ken Nakayama2, Talia Konkle2.   

Abstract

Visual search is a ubiquitous visual behavior, and efficient search is essential for survival. Different cognitive models have explained the speed and accuracy of search based either on the dynamics of attention or on similarity of item representations. Here, we examined the extent to which performance on a visual search task can be predicted from the stable representational architecture of the visual system, independent of attentional dynamics. Participants performed a visual search task with 28 conditions reflecting different pairs of categories (e.g., searching for a face among cars, body among hammers, etc.). The time it took participants to find the target item varied as a function of category combination. In a separate group of participants, we measured the neural responses to these object categories when items were presented in isolation. Using representational similarity analysis, we then examined whether the similarity of neural responses across different subdivisions of the visual system had the requisite structure needed to predict visual search performance. Overall, we found strong brain/behavior correlations across most of the higher-level visual system, including both the ventral and dorsal pathways when considering both macroscale sectors as well as smaller mesoscale regions. These results suggest that visual search for real-world object categories is well predicted by the stable, task-independent architecture of the visual system. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Here, we ask which neural regions have neural response patterns that correlate with behavioral performance in a visual processing task. We found that the representational structure across all of high-level visual cortex has the requisite structure to predict behavior. Furthermore, when directly comparing different neural regions, we found that they all had highly similar category-level representational structures. These results point to a ubiquitous and uniform representational structure in high-level visual cortex underlying visual object processing.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain/behavior correlations; cognition; fMRI; representational similarity analysis; vision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832600      PMCID: PMC5236111          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00569.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  63 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroimaging of human visual cortex.

Authors:  B A Wandell
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces.

Authors:  Orit Hershler; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 5.  The neural basis of attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Martin Eimer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The representation of biological classes in the human brain.

Authors:  Andrew C Connolly; J Swaroop Guntupalli; Jason Gors; Michael Hanke; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Yu-Chien Wu; Hervé Abdi; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Conceptual object representations in human anterior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways.

Authors:  Stefania Bracci; Hans Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Rogier A Kievit
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Stefania Bracci; J Brendan Ritchie; Ioannis Kalfas; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Representational similarity precedes category selectivity in the developing ventral visual pathway.

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel D Dilks; Kami Koldewyn; Sarah Weigelt; Jenelle Feather; Alexander Je Kell; Boris Keil; Bruce Fischl; Lilla Zöllei; Lawrence Wald; Rebecca Saxe; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects.

Authors:  Robert T Keys; Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A neural population selective for song in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam V Norman-Haignere; Jenelle Feather; Dana Boebinger; Peter Brunner; Anthony Ritaccio; Josh H McDermott; Gerwin Schalk; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study.

Authors:  David A Nicholson; Astrid A Prinz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Predicting how surface texture and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Zoe Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras; Simona Buetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Visual object categorization in infancy.

Authors:  Céline Spriet; Etienne Abassi; Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Liuba Papeo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Representation of color, form, and their conjunction across the human ventral visual pathway.

Authors:  JohnMark Taylor; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 7.400

10.  General object-based features account for letter perception.

Authors:  Daniel Janini; Chris Hamblin; Arturo Deza; Talia Konkle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.