Literature DB >> 33768481

A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects.

Robert T Keys1,2, Jessica Taubert3,4, Susan G Wardle5,4.   

Abstract

Face detection is a priority of both the human and primate visual system. However, occasionally we misperceive faces in inanimate objects -- "face pareidolia". A key feature of these 'false positives' is that face perception occurs in the absence of visual features typical of real faces. Human faces are known to be located faster than objects in visual search. Here we used a visual search paradigm to test whether illusory faces share this advantage. Search times were faster for illusory faces than for matched objects amongst both matched (Experiment 1) and diverse (Experiment 2) distractors, however search times for real human faces were faster and more efficient than objects with or without an illusory face. Importantly, this result indicates that illusory faces are processed quickly enough by the human brain to confer a visual search advantage, suggesting the engagement of a broadly-tuned mechanism that facilitates rapid face detection in cluttered environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face detection; Face perception; Illusory faces; Pareidolia; Visual search

Year:  2021        PMID: 33768481     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02267-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  24 in total

1.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants.

Authors:  C C Goren; M Sarty; P Y Wu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms.

Authors:  Sébastien M Crouzet; Holle Kirchner; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity.

Authors:  Teresa Farroni; Mark H Johnson; Enrica Menon; Luisa Zulian; Dino Faraguna; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The new statistics: why and how.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-12

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Finding faces, animals, and vehicles in far peripheral vision.

Authors:  Muriel Boucart; Quentin Lenoble; Justine Quettelart; Sebastien Szaffarczyk; Pascal Despretz; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Cortical route for facelike pattern processing in human newborns.

Authors:  Marco Buiatti; Elisa Di Giorgio; Manuela Piazza; Carlo Polloni; Giuseppe Menna; Fabrizio Taddei; Ermanno Baldo; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Visual search for object categories is predicted by the representational architecture of high-level visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; George A Alvarez; Ken Nakayama; Talia Konkle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Nikos K Logothetis; Kari L Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Seeing faces is necessary for face-domain formation.

Authors:  Michael J Arcaro; Peter F Schade; Justin L Vincent; Carlos R Ponce; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clutter substantially reduces selectivity for peripheral faces in the macaque brain.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle; Clarissa T Tardiff; Amanda Patterson; David Yu; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds.

Authors:  Matthew Groh; Ziv Epstein; Chaz Firestone; Rosalind Picard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Illusory faces are more likely to be perceived as male than female.

Authors:  Susan G Wardle; Sanika Paranjape; Jessica Taubert; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia.

Authors:  David Alais; Yiben Xu; Susan G Wardle; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.