Literature DB >> 27830486

Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia.

Jeffrey J Nepple1, Joel Wells2, James R Ross3, Asheesh Bedi4, Perry L Schoenecker2, John C Clohisy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detailed recognition of the three-dimensional (3-D) deformity in acetabular dysplasia is important to help guide correction at the time of reorientation during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Common plain radiographic parameters of acetabular dysplasia are limited in their ability to characterize acetabular deficiency precisely. The 3-D characterization of such deficiencies with low-dose CT may allow for more precise characterization. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the variability in 3-D acetabular deficiency in acetabular dysplasia; (2) to define subtypes of acetabular dysplasia based on 3-D morphology; (3) to determine the correlation of plain radiographic parameters with 3-D morphology; and (4) to determine the association of acetabular dysplasia subtype with patient clinical characteristics including sex, range of motion, and femoral version.
METHODS: Using our hip preservation database, we identified 153 hips (148 patients) that underwent PAO from October 2013 to July 2015. Among those, we noted 103 hips in 100 patients with acetabular dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle < 20°) and who had a Tönnis grade of 0 or 1. Eighty-six patients (86%) underwent preoperative low-dose pelvic CT scans at our institution as part of the preoperative planning for PAO. It is currently our standard to obtain preoperative low-dose pelvic CT scans (0.75-1.25 mSv, equivalent to three to five AP pelvis radiographs) on all patients before undergoing PAO unless a prior CT scan was performed at an outside institution. Hips with a history of a neuromuscular disorder, prior trauma, prior surgery, radiographic evidence of joint degeneration, ischemic necrosis, or Perthes-like deformities were excluded. Fifty hips in 50 patients met inclusion criteria and had CT scans available for review. These low-dose CT scans of 50 patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia undergoing evaluation for surgical planning of PAO were then retrospectively studied. CT scans were analyzed quantitatively for acetabular coverage, relative to established normative data for acetabular coverage, as well as measurement of femoral version. The cohort included 45 females and five males with a mean age of 26 years (range, 13-49 years).
RESULTS: Lateral acetabular deficiency was present in all patients, whereas anterior deficiency and posterior deficiency were variable. Three patterns of acetabular deficiency were common: anterosuperior deficiency (15 of 50 [30%]), global deficiency (18 of 50 [36%]), and posterosuperior deficiency (17 of 50 [34%]). The presence of a crossover sign or posterior wall sign was poorly predictive of the dysplasia subtype. With the numbers available, males appeared more likely to have a posterosuperior deficiency pattern (four of five [80%]) compared with females (13 of 45 [29%], p = 0.040). Hip internal rotation in flexion was significantly greater in anterosuperior deficiency (23° versus 18°, p = 0.05), whereas external rotation in flexion was significantly greater in posterosuperior deficiency (43° versus 34°, p = 0.018). Acetabular deficiency pattern did not correlate with femoral version, which was variable across all subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Three patterns of acetabular deficiency commonly occur among young adult patients with mild, moderate, and severe acetabular dysplasia. These patterns include anterosuperior, global, and posterosuperior deficiency and are variably observed independent of femoral version. Recognition of these distinct morphologic subtypes is important for diagnostic and surgical treatment considerations in patients with acetabular dysplasia to optimize acetabular correction and avoid femoroacetabular impingement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27830486      PMCID: PMC5339139          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5150-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of cover of the femoral head in normal and dysplastic hips: new CT-based technique.

Authors:  W Dandachli; V Kannan; R Richards; Z Shah; M Hall-Craggs; J Witt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-11

2.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Markus S Hanke; Guoyan Zheng; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Bryan T Kelly; J W Thomas Byrd; Jérôme Tonetti; Stephane Lavallee; Laurence Chabanas; Guillaume Barrier; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  K Klaue; C W Durnin; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-05

6.  Three-dimensional CT measurement of adult acetabular dysplasia: technique, preliminary results in normal subjects, and potential applications.

Authors:  D L Janzen; S E Aippersbach; P L Munk; D F Sallomi; D Garbuz; J Werier; C P Duncan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip.

Authors:  Masamitsu Ezoe; Masatoshi Naito; Toshio Inoue
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation.

Authors:  S Anda; T Terjesen; K A Kvistad; S Svenningsen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome.

Authors:  S B Murphy; R Ganz; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur: implications for THR.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Emir Kamaric; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masaaki Matsubara; Yoshitada Harada; Kenji Ohzono; Vibor Paravic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  39 in total

1.  Patient Age and Hip Morphology Alter Joint Mechanics in Computational Models of Patients With Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Jessica E Goetz; Kevin N Dibbern; Robert W Westermann; Michael C Willey; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Compensatory Anterior Pelvic Tilt Decrease After Bilateral Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  Erika Daley; Nickolas Nahm; Denise Koueiter; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Microinstability of the hip: a systematic review of the imaging findings.

Authors:  Rebecca M Woodward; Renuka M Vesey; Catherine J Bacon; Steve G White; Matthew J Brick; Donna G Blankenbaker
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  What Is the Reliability and Accuracy of Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in Evaluating Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Coverage During Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  James D Wylie; Mariana G Ferrer; Michael P McClincy; Patricia E Miller; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait.

Authors:  Ke Song; Brecca M M Gaffney; Kevin B Shelburne; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Evaluation and Treatment of Borderline Dysplasia: Moving Beyond the Lateral Center Edge Angle.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Michael P McClincy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

7.  Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Travis J Hillen; Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  The borderline dysplastic hip: when and how is it abnormal?

Authors:  Sarah D Bixby; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

9.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?

Authors:  Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.

Authors:  Klemen Stražar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.