Literature DB >> 16452750

The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip.

Masamitsu Ezoe1, Masatoshi Naito, Toshio Inoue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular retroversion can result from posterior wall deficiency in an otherwise normally oriented acetabulum or from excessive anterior coverage secondary to a malpositioned acetabulum, or both. Theoretically, a retroverted acetabulum, which adversely affects load transmission across the hip, may occur more frequently in hips with degenerative arthritis. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in normal hips and in hips with osteoarthritis, developmental dysplasia, osteonecrosis, and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis of 250 patients (342 hips). Fifty-six patients (112 hips) had normal findings; sixty-six patients (seventy hips) had osteoarthritis; sixty-four (seventy-four hips), developmental dysplasia; thirty (thirty-six hips), osteonecrosis of the femoral head; and thirty-four (fifty hips), Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. The sole criterion for a diagnosis of acetabular retroversion was the presence of a so-called cross-over sign on the anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis.
RESULTS: The prevalence of acetabular retroversion was 6% (seven of 112 hips) in the normal group, 20% (fourteen of seventy hips) in the osteoarthritis group, 18% (thirteen of seventy-four hips) in the developmental dysplasia group, 6% (two of thirty-six hips) in the group with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and 42% (twenty-one of fifty hips) in the group with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. In patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, the prevalence of acetabular retroversion was 68% in twenty-five hips with Stulberg class-III, IV, or V involvement. In contrast, only four (16%) of twenty-five hips with Stulberg class-I or II involvement had acetabular retroversion. The difference was significant (p = 0.0002). Patients with osteoarthritis, developmental dysplasia, or Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease are significantly more likely to have acetabular retroversion than are normal subjects (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular retroversion occurs more commonly in association with a variety of hip diseases, in which the prevalence of subsequent degenerative arthritis is increased, than has been previously noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16452750     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  66 in total

1.  Does Salter innominate osteotomy predispose the patient to acetabular retroversion in adulthood?

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Shinichi Satsuma; Maki Kinugasa; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ischial spine sign reveals acetabular retroversion in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; Anthony A Stans; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Role of bone architecture and anatomy in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-LePain; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  What is the evidence supporting the prevention of osteoarthritis and improved femoral coverage after shelf procedure for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; Keith D Baldwin; Moritz Tannast; Harish Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Relationship of acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement to hip osteoarthritis: a focused review.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Nathaniel K Royer
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Carl Neuerburg; Sabine Lippacher; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery.

Authors:  Aimee C Perreira; John C Hunter; Thaddeus Laird; Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Fabian Kalberer; Rafael J Sierra; Sanjeev S Madan; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in Asian patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Akinori Takeyama; Masatoshi Naito; Kei Shiramizu; Takahiko Kiyama
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Influence of acetabular and femoral version on fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  A Frost; G Pavlou; P J Richards; J Belcher; V Jasani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.