BACKGROUND: Both acetabular undercoverage (hip dysplasia) and overcoverage (pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement) can result in hip osteoarthritis. In contrast to undercoverage, there is a lack of information on radiographic reference values for excessive acetabular coverage. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How do common radiographic hip parameters differ in hips with a deficient or an excessive acetabulum in relation to a control group; and (2) what are the reference values determined from these data for acetabular under- and overcoverage? METHODS: We retrospectively compared 11 radiographic parameters describing the radiographic acetabular anatomy among hip dysplasia (26 hips undergoing periacetabular osteotomy), control hips (21 hips, requiring no rim trimming during surgical hip dislocation), hips with overcoverage (14 hips, requiring rim trimming during surgical hip dislocation), and hips with severe overcoverage (25 hips, defined as having acetabular protrusio). The hips were selected from a patient cohort of a total of 593 hips. Radiographic parameters were assessed with computerized methods on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and corrected for neutral pelvic orientation with the help of a true lateral radiograph. RESULTS: All parameters except the crossover sign differed among the four study groups. From dysplasia through control and overcoverage, the lateral center-edge angle, acetabular arc, and anteroposterior/craniocaudal coverage increased. In contrast, the medial center-edge angle, extrusion/acetabular index, Sharp angle, and prevalence of the posterior wall sign decreased. The following reference values were found: lateral center-edge angle 23° to 33°, medial center-edge angle 35° to 44°, acetabular arc 61° to 65°, extrusion index 17% to 27%, acetabular index 3° to 13°, Sharp angle 38° to 42°, negative crossover sign, positive posterior wall sign, anterior femoral head coverage 15% to 26%, posterior femoral head coverage 36% to 47%, and craniocaudal coverage 70% to 83%. CONCLUSIONS: These acetabular reference values define excessive and deficient coverage. They may be used for radiographic evaluation of symptomatic hips, may offer possible predictors for surgical outcomes, and serve to guide clinical decision-making.
BACKGROUND: Both acetabular undercoverage (hip dysplasia) and overcoverage (pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement) can result in hip osteoarthritis. In contrast to undercoverage, there is a lack of information on radiographic reference values for excessive acetabular coverage. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How do common radiographic hip parameters differ in hips with a deficient or an excessive acetabulum in relation to a control group; and (2) what are the reference values determined from these data for acetabular under- and overcoverage? METHODS: We retrospectively compared 11 radiographic parameters describing the radiographic acetabular anatomy among hip dysplasia (26 hips undergoing periacetabular osteotomy), control hips (21 hips, requiring no rim trimming during surgical hip dislocation), hips with overcoverage (14 hips, requiring rim trimming during surgical hip dislocation), and hips with severe overcoverage (25 hips, defined as having acetabular protrusio). The hips were selected from a patient cohort of a total of 593 hips. Radiographic parameters were assessed with computerized methods on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and corrected for neutral pelvic orientation with the help of a true lateral radiograph. RESULTS: All parameters except the crossover sign differed among the four study groups. From dysplasia through control and overcoverage, the lateral center-edge angle, acetabular arc, and anteroposterior/craniocaudal coverage increased. In contrast, the medial center-edge angle, extrusion/acetabular index, Sharp angle, and prevalence of the posterior wall sign decreased. The following reference values were found: lateral center-edge angle 23° to 33°, medial center-edge angle 35° to 44°, acetabular arc 61° to 65°, extrusion index 17% to 27%, acetabular index 3° to 13°, Sharp angle 38° to 42°, negative crossover sign, positive posterior wall sign, anterior femoral head coverage 15% to 26%, posterior femoral head coverage 36% to 47%, and craniocaudal coverage 70% to 83%. CONCLUSIONS: These acetabular reference values define excessive and deficient coverage. They may be used for radiographic evaluation of symptomatic hips, may offer possible predictors for surgical outcomes, and serve to guide clinical decision-making.
Authors: Moritz Tannast; Sapan Mistry; Simon D Steppacher; Stephan Reichenbach; Frank Langlotz; Klaus A Siebenrock; Guoyan Zheng Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Moritz Tannast; Stefan Fritsch; Guoyan Zheng; Klaus A Siebenrock; Simon D Steppacher Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Timo M Ecker; Moritz Tannast; Marc Puls; Klaus A Siebenrock; Stephen B Murphy Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Corinne A Zurmühle; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Corinne A Zurmühle; Helen Anwander; Christoph E Albers; Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Helen Anwander; Stefan Werlen; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Lucas A Anderson; Mike B Anderson; Jill A Erickson; Jesse Chrastil; Christopher L Peters Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 4.176