Literature DB >> 27830457

Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.

Ahmed Rashid1, Victoria Thomas2, Toni Shaw2, Gillian Leng2.   

Abstract

Clinical guidelines and health technology assessments are valuable instruments to improve the quality of healthcare delivery and aim to integrate the best available evidence with real-world, expert context. The role of patient and public involvement in their development has grown in recent decades, and this article considers the international literature exploring aspects of this participation, including the integration of experiential and scientific knowledge, recruitment strategies, models of involvement, stages of involvement, and methods of evaluation. These developments have been underpinned by the parallel rise of public involvement and evidence-based medicine as important concepts in health policy. Improving the recruitment of guideline group chairs, widening evidence reviews to include patient preference studies, adapting guidance presentation to highlight patient preference points and providing clearer instructions on how patient organisations can submit their intelligence are emerging proposals that may further enhance patient and public involvement in their processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27830457     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0206-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  47 in total

Review 1.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jonathan Boote; Rosemary Telford; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Service user involvement in clinical guideline development and implementation: learning from mental health service users in the UK.

Authors:  Emma Harding; Catherine Johnson Pettinari; Dora Brown; Mark Hayward; Clare Taylor
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2011-08

3.  Stakeholders involvement by HTA Organisations: why is so different?

Authors:  Marianna Cavazza; Claudio Jommi
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Facilitators and barriers to service user involvement in mental health guidelines: lessons from the Netherlands.

Authors:  Alida J van der Ham; Laura S Shields; Roddy van der Horst; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2014-11

5.  Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Julia Abelson; Dorina Simeonov; Francois-Pierre Gauvin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Authors:  Leela Barham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antoine Boivin; Kay Currie; Béatrice Fervers; Javier Gracia; Marian James; Catherine Marshall; Carol Sakala; Sylvia Sanger; Judi Strid; Victoria Thomas; Trudy van der Weijden; Richard Grol; Jako Burgers
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04-27

9.  Involving patients in health technology funding decisions: stakeholder perspectives on processes used in Australia.

Authors:  Edilene Lopes; Jackie Street; Drew Carter; Tracy Merlin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Pamela Lopez-Vargas; Martin Howell; Richard Phoon; David Johnson; Denise Campbell; Rowan G Walker; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  16 in total

1.  Involving People with Learning Disabilities in Guideline Development.

Authors:  Justine Karpusheff; Charlotte Haynes; Fiona Glen; Gillian Leng
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Practical Considerations for Using Online Methods to Engage Patients in Guideline Development.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Glen S Hazlewood; Holly L Peay; Ann Lucas; Ian Coulter; Arlene Fink; Dmitry Khodyakov
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Putting Patients at the Centre of Healthcare: Progress and Challenges for Health Technology Assessments.

Authors:  Karen M Facey; Nicola Bedlington; Sarah Berglas; Neil Bertelsen; Ann N V Single; Victoria Thomas
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  What matters for people with brain cancer? Selecting clinical quality indicators for an Australian Brain Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Misa Matsuyama; Mythily Sachchithananthan; Robyn Leonard; Michael Besser; Anna K Nowak; Donna Truran; Claire M Vajdic; John R Zalcberg; Hui K Gan; Craig Gedye; Winny Varikatt; Eng-Siew Koh; Ganessan Kichenadasse; Hao-Wen Sim; Nicholas G Gottardo; Desma Spyridopoulos; Rosalind L Jeffree
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-08-31

5.  Health democracy in Europe: Cancer patient organization participation in health policy.

Authors:  Kyriakos Souliotis; Lily E Peppou; Eirini Agapidaki; Chara Tzavara; Dominique Debiais; Stanimir Hasurdjiev; Francois Sarkozy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Consent and Autonomy in the Genomics Era.

Authors:  Rachel Horton; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 7.  Practical guidance for engaging patients in health research, treatment guidelines and regulatory processes: results of an expert group meeting organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Authors:  Maarten de Wit; Cyrus Cooper; Peter Tugwell; Nathalie Bere; John Kirwan; Philip G Conaghan; Charlotte Roberts; Isabelle Aujoulat; Nasser Al-Daghri; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; Mary Barker; Nicola Bedlington; Maria Luisa Brandi; Olivier Bruyère; Nansa Burlet; Philippe Halbout; Mickaël Hiligsmann; Famida Jiwa; John A Kanis; Andrea Laslop; Wendy Lawrence; Daniel Pinto; Concepción Prieto Yerro; Véronique Rabenda; René Rizzoli; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar; Mila Vlaskovska; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Patient and public involvement facilitators: Could they be the key to the NHS quality improvement agenda?

Authors:  Sarah Todd; Christine Coupland; Raymond Randall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Nonshaved Ear Surgery: Effect of Hair on Surgical Site Infection of the Middle Ear/Mastoid Surgery and Patients' Preference for the Hair Removal.

Authors:  Dong-Hee Lee; Soonil Yoo; Eunhye Shin; Yesun Cho
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-06-14

10.  The implementation of prioritization exercises in the development and update of health practice guidelines: A scoping review.

Authors:  Amena El-Harakeh; Tamara Lotfi; Ali Ahmad; Rami Z Morsi; Racha Fadlallah; Lama Bou-Karroum; Elie A Akl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.