| Literature DB >> 27830457 |
Ahmed Rashid1, Victoria Thomas2, Toni Shaw2, Gillian Leng2.
Abstract
Clinical guidelines and health technology assessments are valuable instruments to improve the quality of healthcare delivery and aim to integrate the best available evidence with real-world, expert context. The role of patient and public involvement in their development has grown in recent decades, and this article considers the international literature exploring aspects of this participation, including the integration of experiential and scientific knowledge, recruitment strategies, models of involvement, stages of involvement, and methods of evaluation. These developments have been underpinned by the parallel rise of public involvement and evidence-based medicine as important concepts in health policy. Improving the recruitment of guideline group chairs, widening evidence reviews to include patient preference studies, adapting guidance presentation to highlight patient preference points and providing clearer instructions on how patient organisations can submit their intelligence are emerging proposals that may further enhance patient and public involvement in their processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27830457 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0206-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patient ISSN: 1178-1653 Impact factor: 3.883