Literature DB >> 35096405

What matters for people with brain cancer? Selecting clinical quality indicators for an Australian Brain Cancer Registry.

Misa Matsuyama1, Mythily Sachchithananthan1, Robyn Leonard1, Michael Besser1, Anna K Nowak1, Donna Truran2, Claire M Vajdic1, John R Zalcberg1, Hui K Gan1, Craig Gedye1, Winny Varikatt1, Eng-Siew Koh1, Ganessan Kichenadasse3, Hao-Wen Sim1, Nicholas G Gottardo1, Desma Spyridopoulos1, Rosalind L Jeffree1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of a clinical quality registry is to deliver immediate gains in survival and quality of life by delivering timely feedback to practitioners, thereby ensuring every patient receives the best existing treatment. We are developing an Australian Brain Cancer Registry (ABCR) to identify, describe, and measure the impact of the variation and gaps in brain cancer care from the time of diagnosis to the end of life.
METHODS: To determine a set of clinical quality indicators (CQIs) for the ABCR, a database and internet search were used to identify relevant guidelines, which were then assessed for quality using the AGREE II Global Rating Scale. Potential indicators were extracted from 21 clinical guidelines, ranked using a modified Delphi process completed in 2 rounds by a panel of experts and other stakeholders, and refined by a multidisciplinary Working Group.
RESULTS: Nineteen key quality reporting domains were chosen, specified by 57 CQIs detailing the specific inclusion and outcome characteristics to be reported.
CONCLUSION: The selected CQIs will form the basis for the ABCR, provide a framework for achievable data collection, and specify best practices for patients and health care providers, with a view to improving care for brain cancer patients. To our knowledge, the systematic and comprehensive approach we have taken is a world first in selecting the reporting specifications for a brain cancer clinical registry.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi process; brain cancer; clinical quality indicator; clinical quality registry

Year:  2021        PMID: 35096405      PMCID: PMC8789278          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  39 in total

Review 1.  Development of quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery, using a 3-step modified Delphi approach.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Marko Simunovic; Bernard Langer; Hartley Stern; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The Austrian Brain Tumour Registry: a cooperative way to establish a population-based brain tumour registry.

Authors:  Adelheid Wöhrer; Thomas Waldhör; Harald Heinzl; Monika Hackl; Johann Feichtinger; Ulrike Gruber-Mösenbacher; Andreas Kiefer; Hans Maier; Reinhard Motz; Angelika Reiner-Concin; Bernd Richling; Carmen Idriceanu; Michael Scarpatetti; Roland Sedivy; Hans-Christian Bankl; Wolfgang Stiglbauer; Matthias Preusser; Karl Rössler; Johannes Andreas Hainfellner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide.

Authors:  Amy Johnston; Shannon E Kelly; Shu-Ching Hsieh; Becky Skidmore; George A Wells
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  SIOP-E-BTG and GPOH Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Low Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Astrid K Gnekow; Daniela Kandels; Cornelis van Tilburg; Amedeo A Azizi; Enrico Opocher; Tore Stokland; Pablo Hernaiz Driever; A Y N Schouten-van Meeteren; Ulrich W Thomale; Martin U Schuhmann; Thomas Czech; John Robert Goodden; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Brigitte Bison; Shivaram Avula; Rolf-D Kortmann; Beate Timmermann; Torsten Pietsch; Olaf Witt
Journal:  Klin Padiatr       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.349

Review 5.  Carmustine wafer implantation for high-grade gliomas: Evidence-based safety efficacy and practical recommendations from the Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery.

Authors:  A Roux; F Caire; J Guyotat; P Menei; P Metellus; J Pallud
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 6.  Quality indicators for non-small cell lung cancer operations with use of a modified Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Gail Darling; Richard Malthaner; John Dickie; Leigh McKnight; Cindy Nhan; Amber Hunter; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  The role of radiotherapy in the management of patients with diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Timothy C Ryken; Ian Parney; John Buatti; Steven N Kalkanis; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Alvin R Cabrera; John P Kirkpatrick; John B Fiveash; Helen A Shih; Eugene J Koay; Stephen Lutz; Joshua Petit; Samuel T Chao; Paul D Brown; Michael Vogelbaum; David A Reardon; Arnab Chakravarti; Patrick Y Wen; Eric Chang
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Management of glioblastoma: an Australian perspective.

Authors:  Hao-Wen Sim; Anna K Nowak; Zarnie Lwin; Mustafa Khasraw
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-20

10.  From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.

Authors:  Josephine Ocloo; Rachel Matthews
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.