Literature DB >> 21766889

Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Leela Barham1.   

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is the arms-length National Health Service (NHS) agency that provides recommendations to the NHS in England and Wales on clinical practice and technologies that should or should not be used in the NHS. NICE aims to ensure that both the public and patients are included in their work and deliberations that lead to recommendations. This article provides an overview of the ways in which the public and patients can engage with NICE based upon a review of the NICE website and relevant literature. It finds that there are a range of both formal and informal mechanisms that provide an opportunity for the public and patients to be involved, but suggests that there are some improvements that could be made to improve transparency, and suggests further work to explore with the public and patients their views of how involvement should be undertaken. Lessons from the NICE experience are likely to be relevant to other countries that have or are adopting health technology assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21766889     DOI: 10.2165/11586090-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  12 in total

1.  WHO evaluates NICE.

Authors:  Nancy Devlin; David Parkin; Marthe Gold
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-08

2.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.

Authors:  Michael D Rawlins; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-24

3.  Pharmacoeconomics: NICE's approach to decision-making.

Authors:  Michael Rawlins; David Barnett; Andrew Stevens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  "Yes", "No" or "Yes, but"? Multinomial modelling of NICE decision-making.

Authors:  Helen Angela Dakin; Nancy J Devlin; Isaac A O Odeyemi
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Pharmacopolitics and deliberative democracy.

Authors:  Michael D Rawlins
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  Representation and legitimacy in health policy formulation at a national level: perspectives from a study of health technology eligibility procedures in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Timothy Milewa
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.

Authors:  M Schlander
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Patient and public involvement in clinical trials.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

9.  Political accountability of explicit rationing: legitimacy problems faced by NICE.

Authors:  Patrick Brown; Michael Calnan
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2010-02-22

10.  Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Christopher Jones
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.188

View more
  69 in total

1.  A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines.

Authors:  Josie Messina; David L Grainger
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Lumbosacral Dorsal Rhizotomy for Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 3.  Practical Considerations for Using Online Methods to Engage Patients in Guideline Development.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Glen S Hazlewood; Holly L Peay; Ann Lucas; Ian Coulter; Arlene Fink; Dmitry Khodyakov
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid; Victoria Thomas; Toni Shaw; Gillian Leng
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

Review 6.  Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device With Delivery System: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-04

Review 7.  Retinal Prosthesis System for Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 8.  Composite Tissue Transplant of Hand or Arm: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-06-01

9.  Fibreglass Total Contact Casting, Removable Cast Walkers, and Irremovable Cast Walkers to Treat Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-09-21

Review 10.  Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.