Literature DB >> 27829734

601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36 mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program.

Amit Atrey1, Alister Hart2, Nasir Hussain3, Jonathon Waite4, Andrew J Shepherd4, Steve Young4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a retrospective study to assess the clinical outcome, failure rate, and reason for failure of a large consecutive series of 36 mm MoM Corail/Pinnacle total hip replacements (THRs).
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2011, 601 consecutive 36 mm MoM THRs were performed (585 patients). Patients were followed according to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidelines. All patients were accounted for and 469 patients (78%) were clinically and radiographically assessed. 328 females and 141 males with a median age of 73 (range 36-94 years) and a median follow up of 7.2 years (range 5.2-9.7 years) were followed. Clinical data included blood cobalt and chromium, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), plain radiograph, ultrasound of hip and intra-operative findings in those patients who had revision surgery.
RESULTS: 56 patients died of causes unrelated to their hip replacement. The mean survivorship of the implant was 92.8% (range 91.6-94%, 95% CI) at a median time to follow up of 84 months (62-113 months). The functional outcome was good with a median OHS of 38 out of 48 (23-44). The dislocation rate was 0.99%, with all these 6 cases requiring revision. 476 patients had blood tests. 100 patients (21%) had elevated levels of either cobalt above MHRA guidelines of 7 parts per billion (120 and 135 nmol/L respectively for cobalt and chromium). Cobalt was elevated independently of chromium in 75% of the cases (but never vice versa). The mean cup inclination angle was 42°. Each incremental stem size increase resulted in a decrease in cobalt by 11 nmol/L. The most common reason for revision was adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) (12 cases).
CONCLUSION: This paper is the largest and longest follow up of 36 mm MoM THRs. Using the MHRA guidelines for follow up, the revision rates of this cohort has remained low compared to other studies, but unacceptably higher than that of other bearing surfaces. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARMD; Corail/Pinnacle; Failure; MoM; Revision; Survivorship; Taper corrosion; Trunnionosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27829734      PMCID: PMC5094678          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  42 in total

1.  Inflammatory pseudotumor associated with femoral nerve palsy following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. A case report.

Authors:  Robert A E Clayton; Ian Beggs; Donald M Salter; M Helen Grant; James T Patton; Daniel E Porter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

Review 3.  New insights into wear and biological effects of metal-on-metal bearings.

Authors:  Isabelle Catelas; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Sonali Natu; Raghavendra Prasad Sidaginamale; Jamshid Gandhi; David J Langton; Antoni V F Nargol
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Kevin T Hug; Tyler S Watters; Thomas P Vail; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is ultrasound screening reliable for adverse local tissue reaction after hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Takashi Nishii; Takashi Sakai; Masaki Takao; Hideki Yoshikawa; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  A J Hart; S A Sabah; A S Bandi; P Maggiore; P Tarassoli; B Sampson; J A Skinner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-10

8.  Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Oksana T Holubowycz; Robert Middleton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings.

Authors:  James A Browne; C Dustin Bechtold; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Widespread dissemination of metal debris from implants.

Authors:  C P Case; V G Langkamer; C James; M R Palmer; A J Kemp; P F Heap; L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years.

Authors:  Giovanni Benelli; Merildo Maritato; Pierpaolo Cerulli Mariani; Francesco Sasso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Metal-on-Metal Hip Joint Prostheses: a Retrospective Case Series Investigating the Association of Systemic Toxicity with Serum Cobalt and Chromium Concentrations.

Authors:  James H Ho; Jerrold B Leikin; Paul I Dargan; John R H Archer; David M Wood; Jeffrey Brent
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-09-12

3.  Long-term results of metal on metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients (<55yrs).

Authors:  Muhammad Umar; Noman Jahangir; Qasim Malik; Steven Kershaw; Keith Barnes; Syam Morapudi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

4.  Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Fiona Berryman; Andrew Judge; Aleksi Reito; Jamie McConnell; Olli Lainiala; Stephen Young; Antti Eskelinen; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Long-term results of the M2A-38-mm metal-on-metal articulation.

Authors:  Carlo Trevisan; Stefano Piscitello; Raymond Klumpp; Tonino Mascitti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-07

6.  Adverse Tissue Reactions and Metal Ion Behavior After Small-Head Metasul Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Tsunehito Ishida; Toshiyuki Tateiwa; Yasuhito Takahashi; Yohei Nishikawa; Takaaki Shishido; Toshinori Masaoka; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Survivorship of a modular acetabular cup system: medium- to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Kirk Kindsfater; Jim Lesko
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-08-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.