Literature DB >> 2068227

Influence of detector size in photon beam profile measurements.

C H Sibata1, H C Mota, A S Beddar, P D Higgins, K H Shin.   

Abstract

Correction is necessary to account for the detector size in clinical dosimetry of photon and electron beams. This correction is due to the absorbed dose gradient present in a finite-size detector. Further corrections are necessary when the detector and phantom materials are not the same. These corrections are due to the perturbation in the charged-particle fluence. Generally these corrections are applied to measurements along the central axis of the beam. Cross beam profile measurements, however, are not usually corrected for detector size. The ionization profile is also usually assumed to be equivalent to the absorbed dose profile. We have corrected the ionization chamber size effect by two approaches: extrapolation of measurements to zero detector size and deconvolution of measurements using a simple model for the detector response function. We have measured absorbed dose profiles to water using a small water-equivalent plastic scintillation detector. Film profile measurements were also studied. The ionization profile corrected for detector size and absorbed dose profile were not equal, probably due to loss of charged-particle equilibrium in the beam edges. For ionization chamber measurements, knowledge of the charged-particle spectrum is needed to convert ionization to absorbed dose to water. This is not necessary for relative absorbed dose measurements under charged-particle equilibrium. Film has been shown to be a straightforward and reliable method for cross beam profile measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2068227     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/36/5/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Total scatter factors of small beams: a multidetector and Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Stefania Cora; Carlo Cavedon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Assessment of the setup dependence of detector response functions for mega-voltage linear accelerators.

Authors:  Christopher Fox; Tom Simon; Bill Simon; James F Dempsey; Darren Kahler; Jatinder R Palta; Chihray Liu; Guanghua Yan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric characterization and behaviour in small X-ray fields of a microchamber and a plastic scintillator detector.

Authors:  Massimo Pasquino; Claudia Cutaia; Lorenzo Radici; Serena Valzano; Eva Gino; Carlo Cavedon; Michele Stasi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Analysis of small field percent depth dose and profiles: Comparison of measurements with various detectors and effects of detector orientation with different jaw settings.

Authors:  Henry Finlay Godson; M Ravikumar; S Sathiyan; K M Ganesh; Y Retna Ponmalar; C Varatharaj
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  Limited accuracy of dose calculation for large fields at deep depths using the BrainSCAN v5.21 treatment planning system.

Authors:  Wen C Hsi; Yunkai Zhang; Michael C Kirk; Damian Bernard; James C H Chu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Small field electron beam dosimetry using MOSFET detector.

Authors:  Md Nurul Amin; Robert Heaton; Bern Norrlinger; Mohammad K Islam
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Percent depth-dose distribution discrepancies from very small volume ion chambers.

Authors:  Vikren Sarkar; Brian Wang; Hui Zhao; Bart Lynch; Joshua A James; Kiernan T McCullough; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.