| Literature DB >> 27824897 |
Sandra Becker-Bense1,2, Hans-Georg Buchholz3, Bernhard Baier4, Mathias Schreckenberger3, Peter Bartenstein2,5,6, Andreas Zwergal1,2, Thomas Brandt2,7, Marianne Dieterich1,2,6.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to uncover mechanisms of central compensation of vestibular function at brainstem, cerebellar, and cortical levels in patients with acute unilateral midbrain infarctions presenting with an acute vestibular tone imbalance. Eight out of 17 patients with unilateral midbrain infarctions were selected on the basis of signs of a vestibular tone imbalance, e.g., graviceptive (tilts of perceived verticality) and oculomotor dysfunction (skew deviation, ocular torsion) in F18-fluordeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET at two time points: A) in the acute stage, and B) after recovery 6 months later. Lesion-behavior mapping analyses with MRI verified the exact structural lesion sites. Group subtraction analyses and comparisons with healthy controls were performed with Statistic Parametric Mapping for the PET data. A comparison of PET A of acute-stage patients with that of healthy controls showed increases in glucose metabolism in the cerebellum, motion-sensitive visual cortex areas, and inferior temporal lobe, but none in vestibular cortex areas. At the supratentorial level bilateral signal decreases dominated in the thalamus, frontal eye fields, and anterior cingulum. These decreases persisted after clinical recovery in contrast to the increases. The transient activations can be attributed to ocular motor and postural recovery (cerebellum) and sensory substitution of vestibular function for motion perception (visual cortex). The persisting deactivation in the thalamic nuclei and frontal eye fields allows alternative functional interpretations of the thalamic nuclei: either a disconnection of ascending sensory input occurs or there is a functional mismatch between expected and actual vestibular activity. Our data support the view that both thalami operate separately for each hemisphere but receive vestibular input from ipsilateral and contralateral midbrain integration centers. Normally they have gatekeeper functions for multisensory input to the cortex and automatic motor output to subserve balance and locomotion, as well as sensorimotor integration.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27824897 PMCID: PMC5100888 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient data in the acute stage of midbrain infarction.
| patients | lesion side | symptoms | ocular motor signs | ocular tilt reaction | SVV | fall / body tilt | clinical findings | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unstableness of stance/gait | vertigo | double vision | gaze palsy | impaired saccades | impaired OKN | SPN GEN | impaired smooth pursuit | head tilt | skew deviation | ocular torsion | OTR | |||||
| 1 D.J. | R | + | initially rotatory | + | - | - | - | - SPN L/R | - | L | R>L | - | incomplete | -9.3° | left | hemiparesis L, dysarthria, ptosis R |
| 2 D.KH. | L | + | to-and-fro | + | - | left + down | - | - SPN L/R | + | - | - | n.d. | - | 11.3° | right | INO L, hemiparesis R, hemiataxia R, ptosis L, lesion CN III L |
| 3 G.K. | R | + | - | + | vertical | vertical | vertical | - SPN - | + | R | L>R | R | complete | 29.0° | right | |
| 4 M.G. | R | + | - | - | vertical | vertical | vertical | - SPN L | + | - | - | n.d. | - | -18.6° | left | hemiparesis L, hemiataxia L, lesion CN III R, ptosis R, dysarthrophonia, dysphagia |
| 5 M.H. | L | + | - | + | vertical | vertical | vertical | - SPN all | + | R | L>R | R | complete | 8.0° | right | Hemihypesthesia, face L, upbeat-nystagmus, dysarthria |
| 6 S.U. | L | + | - | - | vertical | all | vertical > horizontal | - SPN all | + | - | - | R | incomplete | 7.5° | left | hemiparesis R, hemiataxia R, lesion CN III L, ptosis L, dysarthria |
| 7 T.H. | R | + | - | + | vertical | vertical | vertical | - SPN vertical | + | - | - | - | incomplete | 7.5° | left | hemiparesis/-ataxia L, dysarthria, SPN left |
| 8 V.E. | R | + | to-and-fro | + | vertical | vertical | vertical | - SPN L/R | + | - | - | - | -4.2° | right | dysarthrophonia | |
| Σ | 5 R / 3 L | 8 | 1 rotatory, 2 to-and-fro | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 0 SPN, 7 GEN | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | contra-/ ipsiversive 6/2 | contra-/ ipsilesional 5/3 | |
Key symptoms and objective clinical signs (identified by neurological and neuro-otological examination including neuro-orthoptic assessment) in the eight patients with pathological SVV tilt and PET due to an acute unilateral midbrain infarction.
Abbreviations: CN = cranial nerve; GEN = gaze-evoked nystagmus; L = left; INO = internuclear ophthalmoplegia; OKN = optokinetic nystagmus; OTR = ocular tilt reaction; R = right; SPN = spontaneous nystagmus; SVV = subjective visual vertical; n.d. = not done; (+) = present; (-) = not present; (>) = above.
Fig 1Overlay plots and subtraction analyses of the MRI LBM in midbrain lesions.
A) Overlapping lesion plots of the patients with pathological SVV tilt show voxels primarily in the rostral paramedian mesencephalic-diencephalic regions and illustrate the exact midline zoning of the lesions. B) Subtraction analyses of patients with SVV tilt versus patients without tilt. The percentage of overlapping lesions in the patients with tilt after subtraction of the controls is illustrated by different colors coding for increasing frequencies—from violet (1%) and increasing to dark red (100%). C) Overlay plots of the subtraction analyses of patients with vs. without SVV tilt (indicated in blue) and vice versa (indicated in red), illustrating that there is no overlap of the lesion sites at the mesencephalic brainstem level.
Fig 2Statistical group subtraction analysis (paired t-test) of the PET scans in patients with vestibular midbrain lesions.
The contrast of the PET scan at the acute stage vs. a second scan 6 months later after recovery (indicated in red) revealed at a threshold of p < 0.001 only small bilateral inferior temporal signal differences that partly merged into the inferior-most insula region bilaterally at a lowered significance level of p < 0.005. The inverse contrast recovery vs. acute stage (indicated in blue) showed at p < 0.001 only one signal cluster in the ipsilesional primary visual cortex that expanded at a lowered significance level (p<0.005). At this lowered significance level one additional ipsilesional lateral visual cluster became evident. No signal changes were seen in the cerebellum or other cortical areas for both contrasts, even at the lowered threshold. The numbers on the bottom right of each slice indicate the z-level of the Talairach space.
Fig 3Categorical comparison of PET data in midbrain patients vs. age-matched healthy controls.
A) for the acute stage vs. controls and B) after recovery vs. controls. Significant voxels in the calculation for patients > controls are indicated in red; for the inverse contrast controls > patients are indicated in blue (all p-values are uncorrected). The numbers on the bottom right of each slice indicate the z-level of the Talairach space.
Fig 4Correlation of SVV tilt and rCGM.
The numbers on the bottom right of each slice indicate the z-level of the Talairach space.
Fig 5Schematic drawing of the activation pattern in acute vestibular midbrain infarction.
RCGM increases (red) were seen in the contralateral (right) medullary brainstem including the VN and in the cerebellar hemispheres bilaterally. Additional increases in the cerebellar vermis cannot be found on this slice. RCGM decreases (blue) were seen in both entire thalami and areas of the frontal eye fields (FEF). The parieto-insular vestibular cortex (PIVC) showed no metabolic changes. Increases within the visual cortex are not depicted in this drawing. After recovery the infratentorial increases in the brainstem and cerebellum were largely restituted, whereas the supratentorial decreases persisted.