Literature DB >> 18950719

An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping.

Chris Rorden1, Julius Fridriksson, Hans-Otto Karnath.   

Abstract

Kinkingnéhun et al. (Kinkingnéhun, S., Volle, E., Pélégrini-Issac, M., Golmard, J.L., Lehéricy, S., du Boisguéheneuc, F., Zhang-Nunes, S., Sosson, D., Duffau, H., Samson, Y., Levy, R., Dubois, B., 2007. A novel approach to clinical-radiological correlations: Anatomo-Clinical Overlapping Maps (AnaCOM): method and validation. NeuroImage 37: 1237-1249.) have recently described a novel approach for lesion-behavior mapping (LBM), referred to as Anatomo-Clinical Overlapping Maps (AnaCOM). Conventional voxelwise LBM tools apply statistics to contrast behavioral performance of patients with lesions that encompass given voxels to control patients where these voxels are spared. In contrast, AnaCOM contrasts performance of patients with injury involving given voxels to the performance of neurologically healthy participants. The authors correctly note that their procedure can offer substantially more statistical power than conventional LBM methods. We compared AnaCOM to conventional LBM techniques by examining hemiparesis (a common consequence of stroke) as the behavior of interest. We found that AnaCOM detected many regions of the middle cerebral artery territory not associated with the motor system. We suggest that conventional LBM techniques detect regions that are damaged in patients with a deficit while spared in those without a deficit, while AnaCOM detects regions that are associated with a deficit. Therefore, this new measure may offer poor specificity. Furthermore, on theoretical grounds we suggest that permutation-based thresholding will be a more sensitive method for controlling familywise error than the method of counting lesion-overlap clusters used by AnaCOM. Finally, we note that the within group variability tends to be smaller for neurologically healthy controls than in neurological patients, due to ceiling effects. Therefore, we suggest that nonparametric measures or the Welch's t-test are more appropriate than the conventional pooled variance t-test used by AnaCOM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18950719      PMCID: PMC2667945          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Stephen M Wilson; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Martin I Sereno; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Dissociating neuro-cognitive component processes: voxel-based correlational methodology.

Authors:  Lorraine K Tyler; William Marslen-Wilson; Emmanuel A Stamatakis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Method matters: an empirical study of impact in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Lesley K Fellows; Andrea S Heberlein; Dawn A Morales; Geeta Shivde; Sara Waller; Denise H Wu
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Power in Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Daniel Y Kimberg; H Branch Coslett; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Improving lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath; Leonardo Bonilha
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Voxelwise Bayesian lesion-deficit analysis.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Argye E Hillis; Mikolaj Pawlak; Edward H Herskovits
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Is the spatial distribution of brain lesions associated with closed-head injury predictive of subsequent development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Analysis with brain-image database.

Authors:  E H Herskovits; V Megalooikonomou; C Davatzikos; A Chen; R N Bryan; J P Gerring
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions.

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Matthew Brett
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Monika Fruhmann Berger; Wilhelm Küker; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  56 in total

1.  Pusher syndrome: its cortical correlate.

Authors:  Bernhard Baier; Jelena Janzen; Wibke Müller-Forell; Marcel Fechir; Notger Müller; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Impaired speech repetition and left parietal lobe damage.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; Olafur Kjartansson; Paul S Morgan; Haukur Hjaltason; Sigridur Magnusdottir; Leonardo Bonilha; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Patterns of poststroke brain damage that predict speech production errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Dana Moser; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity.

Authors:  Hugues Duffau
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  An empirical evaluation of multivariate lesion behaviour mapping using support vector regression.

Authors:  Christoph Sperber; Daniel Wiesen; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Important considerations in lesion-symptom mapping: Illustrations from studies of word comprehension.

Authors:  Hinna Shahid; Rajani Sebastian; Tatiana T Schnur; Taylor Hanayik; Amy Wright; Donna C Tippett; Julius Fridriksson; Chris Rorden; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Brain regions essential for word comprehension: Drawing inferences from patients.

Authors:  Argye E Hillis; Christopher Rorden; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Topographic diagnosis of internuclear ophthalmoparesis: evidence from a lesion-behavior mapping study.

Authors:  Bernhard Baier; Frank Thömke; Wibke Müller-Forell; Notger Müller; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Using machine learning-based lesion behavior mapping to identify anatomical networks of cognitive dysfunction: Spatial neglect and attention.

Authors:  Daniel Wiesen; Christoph Sperber; Grigori Yourganov; Christopher Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: standards for establishing the effects of treatment.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; Ana Ansaldo; Roelien Bastiaanse; Leora R Cherney; David Howard; Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah; Marcus Meinzer; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.