Literature DB >> 2782215

Response bias in a health status survey of elderly people.

K Rockwood1, P Stolee, D Robertson, E R Shillington.   

Abstract

This paper compares respondents and non-respondents from the community sample of the Saskatchewan Health Status Survey of the Elderly. Response bias was assessed by comparing the demographic characteristics and use of health care services of the two groups. A stratified two-stage area probability sample was drawn from a comprehensive sampling frame. There were 1614 subjects eligible; interviews were completed with 1267 (78.5%). In the very elderly (85+ years) cohort, disproportionately more urban dwellers and more males were interviewed; the sample was otherwise demographically representative of the elderly population. Non-respondents, especially the very elderly, used significantly more medical services than respondents, and had a higher number of hospital admissions. Non-respondents over age 75 experienced significantly longer average lengths of stay. On average, non-respondents used approximately 15% more hospital days. Non-respondents over age 75 appear to be more likely to experience ill health than respondents. Hence, statistics from this survey are conservative estimates of the ill health of the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2782215     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/18.3.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  12 in total

1.  Responders versus nonresponders in a dementia study of the oldest old: the 90+ study.

Authors:  Annlia Paganini-Hill; Beverly Ducey; Marian Hawk
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Brian E Clauser; Terry Field; Robert A Yood; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Development and Validation of a Measure of Quality of Life for the Young Elderly in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Sudirikku Hennadige Padmal de Silva; Anura Rohan Jayasuriya; Lalini Chandika Rajapaksa; Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu de Silva; Simon Barraclough
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 1.399

4.  Characteristics of non-participants and reasons for non-participation in a population survey in Kin-Hu, Kinmen.

Authors:  P Chou; H S Kuo; C H Chen; H C Lin
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Incidence and outcomes of diabetes mellitus in elderly people: report from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

Authors:  K Rockwood; E Awalt; C MacKnight; I McDowell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Issues of recruitment and maintaining high response rates in a longitudinal study of older hospital patients in England--pathways through care study.

Authors:  B A Gregson; M Smith; J Lecouturier; N Rousseau; H Rodgers; J Bond
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs.

Authors:  E K Osnes; C M Lofthus; H E Meyer; J A Falch; L Nordsletten; I Cappelen; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Patients' views on follow up of colorectal cancer: implications for risk communication and decision making.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; B Heyman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Dropout in a longitudinal, cohort study of urologic disease in community men.

Authors:  Naomi M Gades; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Michael M Lieber; Rosebud O Roberts; Cynthia J Girman; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Is global quality of life reduced before fracture in patients with low-energy wrist or hip fracture? A comparison with matched controls.

Authors:  Gudrun Rohde; Glenn Haugeberg; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Torbjorn Moum; Astrid K Wahl
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.