Literature DB >> 9425465

Issues of recruitment and maintaining high response rates in a longitudinal study of older hospital patients in England--pathways through care study.

B A Gregson1, M Smith, J Lecouturier, N Rousseau, H Rodgers, J Bond.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To describe and discuss the methods used to recruit and maintain an unbiased sample of older discharged hospital patients in a study of the process and outcomes of hospital care.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal interview study of consecutive patients admitted to hospital over a 12 month period and followed up for six months. Interviews took place in hospital five days after admission, at home 10 days after discharge, and six months after admission.
SETTING: Six hospital locations: three in the north of England and three in the south. PARTICIPANTS: People aged 65 and over admitted to hospital with a new stroke or fractured neck of femur, their significant other, and nursing staff caring for them. MAIN
RESULTS: Of 3105 patients referred to the study, 2111 were eligible and 1671 (79%) were recruited. Recruited stroke patients were younger than those not recruited and rates differed between locations for both stroke and fractured neck of femur. By six months after admission 25% had died. Outcome data were obtained for 85% of the surviving patients. Patients who died were older and frailer before admission. Among survivors, outcome data for stroke patients were less likely to be obtained for men, those more able initially, and those who were married. Response rates to each interview differed according to respondent types. Interviews were more likely to be obtained with significant others than patients. Patients who were not able to be interviewed were older and frailer; significant others were less likely to be interviewed if the patients were younger and more able.
CONCLUSIONS: High response rates can be achieved with very frail older people if strategies are adopted to maintain their interest and if self reported data are supplemented by interviewing significant others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9425465      PMCID: PMC1060541          DOI: 10.1136/jech.51.5.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  16 in total

1.  Predicting risk among non-respondents in prospective studies.

Authors:  K Sheikh
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Alternative approaches for estimating prevalence in epidemiologic surveys with two waves of respondents.

Authors:  H Brenner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Non-response bias in studies of diabetic complications: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study.

Authors:  L J Melton; P J Dyck; J L Karnes; P C O'Brien; F J Service
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Mortality and cancer rates in nonrespondents to a prospective study of older women: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  K M Bisgard; A R Folsom; C P Hong; T A Sellers
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey.

Authors:  L B Cottler; J F Zipp; L N Robins; E L Spitznagel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases among older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  M B Mittelmark; B M Psaty; P M Rautaharju; L P Fried; N O Borhani; R P Tracy; J M Gardin; D H O'Leary
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Characteristics of older nonrespondents over five waves of a panel study.

Authors:  F H Norris
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1985-09

8.  Assessing health-related quality of life in elderly outpatients: telephone versus face-to-face administration.

Authors:  M Weinberger; B Nagle; J T Hanlon; G P Samsa; K Schmader; P B Landsman; K M Uttech; P A Cowper; H J Cohen; J R Feussner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Baseline characteristics are not sufficient indicators of non-response bias follow up studies.

Authors:  J Vestbo; F V Rasmussen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Assessment of depression and cognitive impairment after hip fracture.

Authors:  N Billig; S W Ahmed; P Kenmore; D Amaral; M Z Shakhashiri
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  The acceptability of incorporating a youth smoking prevention intervention in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Chen Chen; Bin Huang; Judith S Gordon
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-05

2.  Use of Statins and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients.

Authors:  Fazeel M Siddiqui; Carl D Langefeld; Charles J Moomaw; Mary E Comeau; Padmini Sekar; Jonathan Rosand; Chelsea S Kidwell; Sharyl Martini; Jennifer L Osborne; Sonja Stutzman; Christiana Hall; Daniel Woo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Functional abilities and continence: the use of proxy respondents in research involving older people.

Authors:  C Shaw; E McColl; S Bond
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  How to get older people included in clinical studies.

Authors:  Miles D Witham; Marion E T McMurdo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.