Literature DB >> 27817993

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Revision of Metal-on-Metal Total Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Ana Mata-Fink1, Daniel J Philipson2, Benjamin J Keeney3, Dipak B Ramkumar1, Wayne E Moschetti3, Ivan M Tomek3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure of metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) bearings is often accompanied by an aggressive local reaction associated with destruction of bone, muscle, and other soft tissues around the hip. Little is known about whether patient-reported physical and mental function following revision THA in MOM patients is compromised by this soft tissue damage, and whether revision of MOM THA is comparable with revision of hard-on-soft bearings such as metal-on-polyethylene (MOP).
METHODS: We identified 75 first-time MOM THA revisions and compared them with 104 first-time MOP revisions. Using prospective patient-reported measures via the Veterans RAND-12, we compared Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score function at preoperative baseline and postoperative follow-up between revision MOM THA and revision MOP THA.
RESULTS: Physical Component Score did not vary between the groups preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Mental Component Score preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively were lower in patients in the MOM cohort compared with patients with MOP revisions (baseline: 43.7 vs 51.3, P < .001; 1 month: 44.9 vs 53.3, P < .001; 3 months: 46.0 vs 52.3, P = .016). However, by 1 year, MCS scores were not significantly different between the revision cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Postrevision physical function in revised MOM THA patients does not differ significantly from the outcomes of revised MOP THA. Mental function is markedly lower in MOM patients at baseline and early in the postoperative period, but does not differ from MOP patients at 1 year after revision. This information should be useful to surgeons and physicians facing MOM THA revision.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metal-on-metal total bearings; patient-reported measures; patient-reported outcomes; physical function; revision; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27817993      PMCID: PMC5362325          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  23 in total

1.  Clinical experience of revision of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL).

Authors:  Asim Rajpura; Martyn L Porter; Anil K Gambhir; Anthony J Freemont; Timothy N Board
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Failure of a metal on metal hip prosthesis presenting as a destructive soft tissue mass due to ALVAL.

Authors:  Jonathan R B Hutt; Constant Busch; Rod A Hughes
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Current literature and imaging techniques of aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL).

Authors:  P J Duggan; C J Burke; S Saha; M Moonim; M George; A Desai; R Houghton
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G Grammatopolous; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

5.  Revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates.

Authors:  Louis S Stryker; Susan M Odum; Thomas K Fehring; Bryan D Springer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome.

Authors:  Koen A De Smet; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Maarten Van Orsouw; Rachid Doubi; Katrien Backers; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Sonali Natu; Raghavendra Prasad Sidaginamale; Jamshid Gandhi; David J Langton; Antoni V F Nargol
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Evidence-based understanding of management perils for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Joshua J Jacobs; Steven J MacDonald; Hollis G Potter; Thomas K Fehring; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D H Sochart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty for metal-on-metal failure.

Authors:  Justin S Chang; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-04

2.  Perioperative factors associated with increased length of stay after revision of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan H Garfinkel; Brian P Gladnick; Cole S Pachter; Niall H Cochrane; David W Romness
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-01-17

3.  Mid-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Wenli Chen; Weiguang Yu; Mingdong Zhao; Jinluan Lin; Chaoming Zhou; Hui Chen; Junxing Ye; Xianshang Zeng; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Use of Computerized Adaptive Testing to Develop More Concise Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Liam T Kane; Surena Namdari; Otho R Plummer; Pedro Beredjiklian; Alexander Vaccaro; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-03-12

5.  Revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using cemented arthroplasty: a mean 10-year follow-up of 157 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jinluan Lin; Chunlong Huang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han; Xiangzhen Liu; Xianshang Zeng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.