Literature DB >> 27807265

Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.

D A Gray1, E Gabel2, T Blankers2,3, R M Hennig2.   

Abstract

The question of why males of many species produce elaborate mating displays has now been largely resolved: females prefer to mate with males that produce such displays. However, the question of why females prefer such displays has been controversial, with an emerging consensus that such displays often provide information to females about the direct fitness benefits that males provide to females and/or the indirect fitness benefits provided to offspring. Alternative explanations, such as production of arbitrarily attractive sons or innate pre-existing female sensory or perceptual bias, have also received support in certain taxa. Here, we describe multivariate female preference functions for male acoustic traits in two chirping species of field crickets with slow pulse rates; our data reveal cryptic female preferences for long trills that have not previously been observed in other chirping species. The trill preferences are evolutionarily pre-existing in the sense that males have not (yet?) exploited them, and they coexist with chirp preferences as alternative stable states within female song preference space. We discuss escape from neuronal adaptation as a possible mechanism underlying such latent preferences.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gryllus; neuronal adaptation; preference functions; sensory bias

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807265      PMCID: PMC5124099          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  37 in total

1.  Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  Caroline L Bentsen; John Hunt; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Conservation of multivariate female preference functions and preference mechanisms in three species of trilling field crickets.

Authors:  T Blankers; R M Hennig; D A Gray
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Phenotypic variation and covariation indicate high evolvability of acoustic communication in crickets.

Authors:  T Blankers; A K Lübke; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  A NARROW HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN CLOSELY RELATED CRICKET SPECIES.

Authors:  Richard G Harrison; Jonathan Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Computational principles underlying recognition of acoustic signals in grasshoppers and crickets.

Authors:  Bernhard Ronacher; R Matthias Hennig; Jan Clemens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  How females of chirping and trilling field crickets integrate the 'what' and 'where' of male acoustic signals during decision making.

Authors:  Eileen Gabel; David A Gray; R Matthias Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Experimental analysis of multivariate female choice in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): evidence for directional and stabilizing selection.

Authors:  H Carl Gerhardt; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Multivariate sexual selection on male song structure in wild populations of sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Orthoptera: Haglidae).

Authors:  Geoffrey D Ower; Kevin A Judge; Sandra Steiger; Kyle J Caron; Rebecca A Smith; John Hunt; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  A neural mechanism for time-window separation resolves ambiguity of adaptive coding.

Authors:  K Jannis Hildebrandt; Bernhard Ronacher; R Matthias Hennig; Jan Benda
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  An auditory feature detection circuit for sound pattern recognition.

Authors:  Stefan Schöneich; Konstantinos Kostarakos; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  9 in total

1.  Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.

Authors:  D A Gray; E Gabel; T Blankers; R M Hennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  How females of chirping and trilling field crickets integrate the 'what' and 'where' of male acoustic signals during decision making.

Authors:  Eileen Gabel; David A Gray; R Matthias Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Male mate choice via cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones drives reproductive isolation between Drosophila species.

Authors:  Michael P Shahandeh; Alison Pischedda; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Acoustic Pattern Recognition and Courtship Songs: Insights from Insects.

Authors:  Christa A Baker; Jan Clemens; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Sexual selection and 'species recognition' revisited: serial processing and order-of-operations in mate choice.

Authors:  David A Gray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A small, computationally flexible network produces the phenotypic diversity of song recognition in crickets.

Authors:  Jan Clemens; Stefan Schöneich; Konstantinos Kostarakos; R Matthias Hennig; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Induced expression of a vestigial sexual signal.

Authors:  David A Gray; Scherezade Hormozi; Fritz R Libby; Randy W Cohen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Cranking up the heat: relationships between energetically costly song features and the increase in thorax temperature in male crickets and katydids.

Authors:  Bettina Erregger; Helmut Kovac; Anton Stabentheiner; Manfred Hartbauer; Heinrich Römer; Arne K D Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Molecular biogeography and host relations of a parasitoid fly.

Authors:  David A Gray; Henry D Kunerth; Marlene Zuk; William H Cade; Susan L Balenger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.