Literature DB >> 16670989

Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus.

Caroline L Bentsen1, John Hunt, Michael D Jennions, Robert Brooks.   

Abstract

Mate choice may impose both linear (i.e., directional) and nonlinear (i.e., quadratic and correlational) sexual selection on advertisement traits. Traditionally, mate recognition and sensory tuning have been thought to impose stabilizing (i.e., negative quadratic) sexual selection, whereas adaptive mate choice effects directional selection. It has been suggested that adaptive choice may exert positive quadratic and/or correlational sexual selection. Earlier, we showed that five structural components of the advertisement call of male field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus) were under multivariate stabilizing selection under laboratory conditions. Here we experimentally estimate selection on these five traits plus a measure of calling activity (the number of repeats in a looped bout of calling) in the field. There was general support for multivariate stabilizing selection on call structure, and calling activity was under strong positive directional selection, as predicted for a signal of genetic quality. There was, however, also appreciable correlational selection, suggesting an interaction between male call structure and calling effort. Interestingly, selection for short interbout durations of silence favored longer intercall durations in the field, in contrast to results from continuous looped call playback in the laboratory. We discuss the general importance of nonlinear selection in the honest signaling of genetic quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16670989     DOI: 10.1086/501376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  38 in total

1.  Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects.

Authors:  Rafael L Rodríguez; Karthik Ramaswamy; Reginald B Cocroft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus).

Authors:  John Hunt; Mark W Blows; Felix Zajitschek; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Multivariate sexual selection in a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype.

Authors:  Kevin P Oh; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons of male sagebrush crickets in the wild.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Geoffrey D Ower; Johannes Stökl; Christopher Mitchell; John Hunt; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.

Authors:  D A Gray; E Gabel; T Blankers; R M Hennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The scent of inbreeding: a male sex pheromone betrays inbred males.

Authors:  Erik van Bergen; Paul M Brakefield; Stéphanie Heuskin; Bas J Zwaan; Caroline M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.

Authors:  Daniel J Hemmann; Jeremy D Allison; Kenneth F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 10.  Nutritional geometry provides food for thought.

Authors:  C Ruth Archer; Nick Royle; Sandra South; Colin Selman; John Hunt
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.