Literature DB >> 12783001

Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life.

John A Girotto1, Jeffrey Schreiber, Maurice Y Nahabedian.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of information in the literature that focuses on quality-of-life issues after mastectomy with breast reconstruction in elderly women. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' experience with breast reconstruction after mastectomy in women older than 65 years of age. Emphasis was placed on the types of reconstructions, outcomes, and evaluation of issues related to quality of life. Between July 1997 and July 2001, 316 consecutive women (400 reconstructions) with breast cancer underwent mastectomy with reconstruction at the authors' institution. Of these women, 24 (28 reconstructions) were at least 65 years old. Mean patient age was 69.3 years (range, 65-77 years). Methods of breast reconstruction included two-stage implant reconstruction (50%), free tissue transfer (transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, 25%), pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (14%), or a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (11%). Outcomes were assessed with the use of a self-reported questionnaire (SF-36) addressing health-related quality of life, body image, and physical functioning. With respect to overall quality-of-life issues after reconstruction, older patients with breast reconstruction scored higher (better outcomes) than age-matched general population patients and previously reported mastectomy-only patients (>55 years) in all surveyed areas. Specifically, study patients reported dramatic increases (better outcomes) in the subscales that are strongly influenced by one's mental health. However, when compared with prior data for younger patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction, the older patients scored lower (worse outcomes) in the areas related to physical function. The older patients maintained superior scores (better outcomes) over the younger patients in the subscales influenced by one's mental health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783001     DOI: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000069064.68579.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  21 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction and psychosocial adjustment: what have we learned and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Choices in surgery for older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Vikram Swaminathan; Markos K Spiliopoulos; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Margaret S Roubaud; Joseph N Carey; Emma Vartanian; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Measuring health-related quality of life in older patient populations: a review of current approaches.

Authors:  Anne Hickey; Maja Barker; Hannah McGee; Ciaran O'Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Variation in the utilization of reconstruction following mastectomy in elderly women.

Authors:  Haejin In; Wei Jiang; Stuart R Lipsitz; Bridget A Neville; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Positive and negative aspects of well-being as correlates of breast reconstruction decision.

Authors:  Jolanta Zycinska; Ewa Gruszczynska; Alina Choteborska
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation practice.

Authors:  Susie A Chen; Crispin Hiley; Dana Nickleach; Janjira Petsuksiri; Fundagul Andic; Oliver Riesterer; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Mylin A Torres
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.