Literature DB >> 27803865

Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Mohammad Taher Rajabi1, Najmeh Zavarzadeh1, Alireza Mahmoudi1, Mohammad Karim Johari1, Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini1, Yalda Abrishami1, Mohammad Bagher Rajabi1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the clinical outcomes of different intubation techniques in the cases of failed primary probing.
METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 338 patients with the diagnosis of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with age 1-4y that had failed primary probing. Intubation was performed under light sedation in operating room and the stent was left 3mo in place. Clinical outcome was investigated 3mo after tube removal.
RESULTS: Bicanalicular intubation method had higher complete and relative success rates compared to monocanalicular intubation (P=0.00). In addition, Monoka intubation had better outcomes compared to Masterka technique (P=0.046). No difference was found between genders but the higher the age, the better the outcomes with bicanalicular technique rather than monocanalicular.
CONCLUSION: Overall success rate of bicanalicular intubation is superior to monocanalicular technique especially in older ages. Also, based upon our clinical outcomes, Masterka intubation is not recommended in cases of failed probing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; failed probing; intubation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803865      PMCID: PMC5075663          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.10.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  23 in total

1.  Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Davood Gharabaghi; Reza Nabai; Mohammad Abbaszadeh
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Hossein Mansoori
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Bülent Yazici; Cengiz Akarsu; Muhsin Salkaya
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults.

Authors:  Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Roxanne C Kempster; Gavin D Galloway; Bijan Beigi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.746

5.  Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method using intranasal endoscopy to treat congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Aysel Pelit; Fatma Caylakli; Rana Altan Yaycioglu; Yonca Akova
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Comparison of monocanalicular stenting and balloon dacryoplasty in secondary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing.

Authors:  Scott M Goldstein; Jeffrey B Goldstein; James A Katowitz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.746

7.  Effect of short-duration silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Neal J Peterson; R Grey Weaver; R Patrick Yeatts
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  Timing of Silastic tubing removal after intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  M G Welsh; J A Katowitz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.746

9.  Pushed monocanalicular intubation. Pitfalls, deleterious side effects, and complications.

Authors:  B Fayet; E Racy; J-M Ruban; J Katowitz
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 0.818

10.  Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Pavel Komínek; Stanislav Cervenka; Tomáš Pniak; Karol Zeleník; Hana Tomášková; Petr Matoušek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nasal endoscopic features and outcomes of nasal endoscopy guided bicanalicular intubation for complex persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.

Authors:  Manpreet Singh; Manjula Sharma; Manpreet Kaur; Aditi Mehta Grewal; Deepti Yadav; Sabia Handa; Sonam Yangzes; Zoramthara Zadeng; Pankaj Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Monocanalicular Intubation in Children with Incomplete Complex Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Older Than Five Years of Age.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Mansooreh Jamshidian Tehrani; Fereshteh Tayebi; Bita Momenaei
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-06

Review 3.  Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Elena Avram
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Li Min Tai; Yee Cheng Kueh; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.