Literature DB >> 18520828

Effect of short-duration silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Neal J Peterson1, R Grey Weaver, R Patrick Yeatts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of premature dislocation of silicone tubes used in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and investigate the effect of early dislocation on treatment outcome.
METHODS: This retrospective review of 227 cases of silicone intubation in the treatment of 151 patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Specific attention was given to premature tube displacement, persistent epiphora, and the need for reoperation. The effect of the duration of silicone intubation and patient age on surgical outcome was assessed. Significance was determined using a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.
RESULTS: Tube displacement and removal prior to postoperative day 31 occurred in 93 of 227 (41%) of eyes. Four of 24 eyes (17%) in children younger than 12 months who had premature dislocation of silicone tubes compared with 7 of 40 eyes (18%) that maintained silicone tubes for 31 days or greater had persistent epiphora (p = 0.932); in eyes of children from age 12 months to 23 months, 5 of 46 (11%) had persistent epiphora compared with 6 of 78 (8%) (p = 0.549); and in children age 24 months or older, 9 of 23 (39%) eyes had tearing compared with 3 of 16 (19%) (p = 0.181). Reoperation rates were 1 of 24 (4%) compared with 0 of 40 (0%) (p = 0.23) of eyes in children younger than 12 months; no difference between groups (0%) in children from age 12 months to 23 months; and 5 of 23 (22%) versus 0 of 16 (0%) (p = 0.049) of eyes in children age 24 months or older for early tube removal versus standard tube removal, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Premature tube displacement and tube removal prior to day 31 does not increase the risk of persistent epiphora or reoperation in children younger than 24 months. Children older than 24 months who have early tube removal have poorer outcomes with a significantly higher reoperation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520828     DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31817113f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  5 in total

1.  A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Hossein Mansoori
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Najmeh Zavarzadeh; Alireza Mahmoudi; Mohammad Karim Johari; Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini; Yalda Abrishami; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Preventing silicone tube extrusion after nasolacrimal duct intubation in children.

Authors:  Ali-Akbar Sabermoghaddam; Setareh Sagheb Hosseinpoor
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Elena Avram
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Li Min Tai; Yee Cheng Kueh; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.