Literature DB >> 15778670

Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults.

Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli1, Roxanne C Kempster, Gavin D Galloway, Bijan Beigi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the success rate of monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation of incomplete nasolacrimal duct obstruction (nasolacrimal duct stenosis) in adults.
METHODS: In a retrospective, nonrandomized comparative case series, 48 eyes of 44 adult patients with nasolacrimal duct stenosis underwent endoscopic probing and either bicanalicular (BCI; n=22 eyes) or monocanalicular (MCI; n=26 eyes) nasolacrimal duct intubation under general anesthesia. "Complete success" was defined as complete disappearance of the symptoms, "partial success" as improvement with some residual symptoms, and "failure" as absence of improvement or worsening of symptoms at last follow-up. The last follow-up examination included diagnostic probing and irrigation if there was not complete success.
RESULTS: Patient ages ranged from 31 to 90 years (mean, 69; SD, 11.5). Forty-five tubes were removed 6 to 17 weeks (mean, 9.1; SD, 3) after surgery. Premature tube dislocation and removal occurred in one eye with BCI and in two eyes with MCI. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 52 months (mean, 14.9; SD, 8.4). The complete success rate was nearly the same in eyes with MCI (16/26, 61.53%) and BCI (13/22, 59.09%). Partial success (MCI: 8/26, 30.76%; BCI: 1/22, 4.54%) and failure (MCI: 2/26, 7.69%; BCI: 8/22, 36.36%) were, however, significantly different (p=0.010). Complications included 3 slit puncta with BCI and 4 temporary superficial punctuate keratopathy after MCI.
CONCLUSIONS: MCI had virtually the same complete success rate as BCI, a higher partial success rate than BCI, and a lower failure rate than BCI in treatment of nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15778670     DOI: 10.1097/01.iop.0000155524.04390.7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  11 in total

1.  Long term follow up of nasolacrimal intubation in adults.

Authors:  P P Connell; T P Fulcher; E Chacko; M J O' Connor; P Moriarty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Dima Andalib; Hossein Mansoori
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Najmeh Zavarzadeh; Alireza Mahmoudi; Mohammad Karim Johari; Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini; Yalda Abrishami; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Use of the Crawford tube for symptomatic epiphora without nasolacrimal obstruction.

Authors:  Nyu-Xia Tong; Ying-Ying Zhao; Xiu-Ming Jin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Assessment and management of proximal and incomplete symptomatic obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system.

Authors:  Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Farzad Pakdel; Victoria Kiavash
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

6.  Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Pavel Komínek; Stanislav Cervenka; Tomáš Pniak; Karol Zeleník; Hana Tomášková; Petr Matoušek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Endoscopy in the field of oculo-facial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Bijan Beigi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-18

8.  Pulled versus Pushed Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation in Adults with Lacrimal Drainage System Stenosis: A Comparative Case Series.

Authors:  Abolfazl Kasaee; Bahram Eshraghi; Kambiz Ameli; Hossein Ghahvehchian; Mansooreh Jamshidian-Tehrani; Amin Nabavi; Bahman Inanloo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with short-term, pushed-type bicanalicular intubation vs. pulled-type monocanalicular intubation for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Chi; Chun-Chieh Lai
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-28

10.  Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction.

Authors:  Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby; Rania Assem El Essawy; Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky; Yomna Magdy Ismail
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.