Literature DB >> 16935232

Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Bülent Yazici1, Cengiz Akarsu, Muhsin Salkaya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical properties and clinical efficacy of bicanalicular silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
METHODS: The Ritleng method was used for lacrimal intubation in 50 eyes of 42 consecutive patients (mean age, 37.3 months). All procedures were done by or under the supervision of one surgeon. The hollow Ritleng probe was inserted via the canaliculus into the inferior meatus. The polypropylene (Prolene) thread-guide, attached to the silicone tube, was advanced through the probe. Either the Prolene emerged from the nose spontaneously or it was retrieved using a hook without visualization. The tube ends were sutured to the nasal wall. Tube removal was planned for 3 months postoperatively. Resolution of signs and symptoms of lacrimal obstruction was assessed. The mean follow-up time was 18.1 months (range, 3 to 48 months).
RESULTS: The silicone tube was placed successfully in all eyes except 1 (98%). The mean procedure time was 26 minutes for each eye (range, 15 to 45 minutes). Both Prolene guides spontaneously emerged from the nose in only 8 eyes (16%). In the others, one or both Prolene guides were retrieved with a hook. Inadvertent tube dislodgement occurred in 21% of the eyes and required early tube removal. Success, ie, relief of signs and symptoms, was achieved in 86% of eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ritleng method of intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction yields a high rate of success. Contrary to previous reports, our experience suggests that the surgeon must be prepared to retrieve the Prolene guide from the nose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16935232     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  6 in total

1.  Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Najmeh Zavarzadeh; Alireza Mahmoudi; Mohammad Karim Johari; Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini; Yalda Abrishami; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; C Scott Atkinson; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Alexander Khammar; David Morrison; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; Benjamin H Ticho; David K Wallace; David R Weakley
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Nasolacrimal duct intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.

Authors:  S Okumuş; V Öner; C Durucu; E Coşkun; Ü Aksoy; E Durucu; L Şahin; I Erbağcı
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Nasal endoscopic features and outcomes of nasal endoscopy guided bicanalicular intubation for complex persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.

Authors:  Manpreet Singh; Manjula Sharma; Manpreet Kaur; Aditi Mehta Grewal; Deepti Yadav; Sabia Handa; Sonam Yangzes; Zoramthara Zadeng; Pankaj Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  The results of Ritleng bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital and adult partially acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Sevda Aydin Kurna; Tomris Sengor; Murat Garli
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-10-19

Review 6.  The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Li Min Tai; Yee Cheng Kueh; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.