Literature DB >> 27797548

Categorical working memory representations are used in delayed estimation of continuous colors.

Kyle O Hardman1, Evie Vergauwe2, Timothy J Ricker3.   

Abstract

In the last decade, major strides have been made in understanding visual working memory through mathematical modeling of color production responses. In the delayed color estimation task (Wilken & Ma, 2004), participants are given a set of colored squares to remember, and a few seconds later asked to reproduce those colors by clicking on a color wheel. The degree of error in these responses is characterized with mathematical models that estimate working memory precision and the proportion of items remembered by participants. A standard mathematical model of color memory assumes that items maintained in memory are remembered through memory for precise details about the particular studied shade of color. We contend that this model is incomplete in its present form because no mechanism is provided for remembering the coarse category of a studied color. In the present work, we remedy this omission and present a model of visual working memory that includes both continuous and categorical memory representations. In 2 experiments, we show that our new model outperforms this standard modeling approach, which demonstrates that categorical representations should be accounted for by mathematical models of visual working memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27797548      PMCID: PMC5179301          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  37 in total

1.  Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04

2.  Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Sophie Portrat; Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Portrat; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The number and quality of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-10

7.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05

Review 10.  Trisecting representational states in short-term memory.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; John Jonides
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  23 in total

1.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Dissociations of the number and precision of visual short-term memory representations in change detection.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

4.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

6.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andra Arnicane; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Swap errors in spatial working memory are guesses.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

9.  Distraction biases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Anurima Mummaneni; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

10.  Statistical learning as a reference point for memory distortions: Swap and shift errors.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Julie D Golomb; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.