Dexiang Liu1,2, Feng Xu2,3, Doris D Lin2, Peter C M van Zijl2,3, Qin Qin2,3. 1. Department of Radiology, Panyu District Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. 2. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a non-contrast-enhanced MRI method for cerebral blood volume (CBV) mapping using velocity-selective (VS) pulse trains. METHODS: The new pulse sequence applied velocity-sensitive gradient waveforms in the VS label modules and velocity-compensated ones in the control scans. Sensitivities to the gradient imperfections (e.g., eddy currents) were evaluated through phantom studies. CBV quantification procedures based on simulated labeling efficiencies for arteriolar, capillary, and venular blood as a function of cutoff velocity (Vc) are presented. Experiments were conducted on healthy volunteers at 3T to examine the effects of unbalanced diffusion weighting, cerebrospinal (CSF) contamination and variation of Vc. RESULTS: Phantom results of the used VS pulse trains demonstrated robustness to eddy currents. The mean CBV values of gray matter and white matter for the experiments using Vc = 3.5 mm/s and velocity-compensated control with CSF-nulling were 5.1 ± 0.6 mL/100 g and 2.4 ± 0.2 mL/100 g, respectively, which were 23% and 32% lower than results from the experiment with velocity-insensitive control, corresponding to 29% and 25% lower in averaged temporal signal-to-noise ratio values. CONCLUSION: A novel technique using VS pulse trains was demonstrated for CBV mapping. The results were both qualitatively and quantitatively close to those from existing methods. Magn Reson Med 77:92-101, 2017.
PURPOSE: To develop a non-contrast-enhanced MRI method for cerebral blood volume (CBV) mapping using velocity-selective (VS) pulse trains. METHODS: The new pulse sequence applied velocity-sensitive gradient waveforms in the VS label modules and velocity-compensated ones in the control scans. Sensitivities to the gradient imperfections (e.g., eddy currents) were evaluated through phantom studies. CBV quantification procedures based on simulated labeling efficiencies for arteriolar, capillary, and venular blood as a function of cutoff velocity (Vc) are presented. Experiments were conducted on healthy volunteers at 3T to examine the effects of unbalanced diffusion weighting, cerebrospinal (CSF) contamination and variation of Vc. RESULTS: Phantom results of the used VS pulse trains demonstrated robustness to eddy currents. The mean CBV values of gray matter and white matter for the experiments using Vc = 3.5 mm/s and velocity-compensated control with CSF-nulling were 5.1 ± 0.6 mL/100 g and 2.4 ± 0.2 mL/100 g, respectively, which were 23% and 32% lower than results from the experiment with velocity-insensitive control, corresponding to 29% and 25% lower in averaged temporal signal-to-noise ratio values. CONCLUSION: A novel technique using VS pulse trains was demonstrated for CBV mapping. The results were both qualitatively and quantitatively close to those from existing methods. Magn Reson Med 77:92-101, 2017.
Authors: Colin P Derdeyn; Tom O Videen; Kent D Yundt; Susanne M Fritsch; David A Carpenter; Robert L Grubb; William J Powers Journal: Brain Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: James H Holmes; Mu-Lan Jen; Laura B Eisenmenger; Tilman Schubert; Patrick A Turski; Kevin M Johnson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Y Msayib; M Craig; M A Simard; J R Larkin; D D Shin; T T Liu; N R Sibson; T W Okell; M A Chappell Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 4.668