Literature DB >> 27796600

Robust augmented reality registration method for localization of solid organs' tumors using CT-derived virtual biomechanical model and fluorescent fiducials.

Seong-Ho Kong1,2, Nazim Haouchine3, Renato Soares1, Andrey Klymchenko4, Bohdan Andreiuk4, Bruno Marques3, Galyna Shabat5, Thierry Piechaud6, Michele Diana7,8, Stéphane Cotin3, Jacques Marescaux1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) is the fusion of computer-generated and real-time images. AR can be used in surgery as a navigation tool, by creating a patient-specific virtual model through 3D software manipulation of DICOM imaging (e.g., CT scan). The virtual model can be superimposed to real-time images enabling transparency visualization of internal anatomy and accurate localization of tumors. However, the 3D model is rigid and does not take into account inner structures' deformations. We present a concept of automated AR registration, while the organs undergo deformation during surgical manipulation, based on finite element modeling (FEM) coupled with optical imaging of fluorescent surface fiducials.
METHODS: Two 10 × 1 mm wires (pseudo-tumors) and six 10 × 0.9 mm fluorescent fiducials were placed in ex vivo porcine kidneys (n = 10). Biomechanical FEM-based models were generated from CT scan. Kidneys were deformed and the shape changes were identified by tracking the fiducials, using a near-infrared optical system. The changes were registered automatically with the virtual model, which was deformed accordingly. Accuracy of prediction of pseudo-tumors' location was evaluated with a CT scan in the deformed status (ground truth). In vivo: fluorescent fiducials were inserted under ultrasound guidance in the kidney of one pig, followed by a CT scan. The FEM-based virtual model was superimposed on laparoscopic images by automatic registration of the fiducials.
RESULTS: Biomechanical models were successfully generated and accurately superimposed on optical images. The mean measured distance between the estimated tumor by biomechanical propagation and the scanned tumor (ground truth) was 0.84 ± 0.42 mm. All fiducials were successfully placed in in vivo kidney and well visualized in near-infrared mode enabling accurate automatic registration of the virtual model on the laparoscopic images.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experiments showed the potential of a biomechanical model with fluorescent fiducials to propagate the deformation of solid organs' surface to their inner structures including tumors with good accuracy and automatized robust tracking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Automatic registration; Fiducials; Finite element modeling; Fluorescence-guided surgery; Optical imaging; Solid organ tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796600     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5297-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  36 in total

1.  Augmented reality navigation system for laparoscopic splenectomy in children based on preoperative CT image using optical tracking device.

Authors:  Satoshi Ieiri; Munenori Uemura; Kouzou Konishi; Ryota Souzaki; Yoshihiro Nagao; Norifumi Tsutsumi; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Kenoki Ohuchida; Takeshi Ohdaira; Morimasa Tomikawa; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume; Tomoaki Taguchi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Impact of Soft Tissue Heterogeneity on Augmented Reality for Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Nazim Haouchine; Stephane Cotin; Igor Peterlik; Jeremie Dequidt; Mario Sanz Lopez; Erwan Kerrien; Marie-Odile Berger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nishita Kothary; Jeremy J Heit; John D Louie; William T Kuo; Billy W Loo; Albert Koong; Daniel T Chang; David Hovsepian; Daniel Y Sze; Lawrence V Hofmann
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Direct estimation of nonrigid registrations with image-based self-occlusion reasoning.

Authors:  Vincent Gay-Bellile; Adrien Bartoli; Patrick Sayd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Next step in minimally invasive surgery: hybrid image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Anatomic features involved in technical complexity of partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Weibin Hou; Weigang Yan; Zhigang Ji
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Authors:  R Santambrogio; E Opocher; A Pisani Ceretti; M Barabino; M Costa; S Leone; M Montorsi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Preoperative planning and real-time assisted navigation by three-dimensional individual digital model in partial nephrectomy with three-dimensional laparoscopic system.

Authors:  Dongwen Wang; Bin Zhang; Xiaobin Yuan; Xuhui Zhang; Chen Liu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Laparoscopic navigation pointer for three-dimensional image-guided surgery.

Authors:  R Mårvik; T Langø; G A Tangen; J O Andersen; J H Kaspersen; B Ystgaard; E Sjølie; R Fougner; H E Fjøsne; T A Nagelhus Hernes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Near-infrared emitting polymer nanogels for efficient sentinel lymph node mapping.

Authors:  Young-Woock Noh; Seong-Ho Kong; Doo-Yeol Choi; Hye Sun Park; Han-Kwang Yang; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hee Chan Kim; Keon Wook Kang; Moon-Hee Sung; Yong Taik Lim
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 15.881

View more
  10 in total

1.  The accurate surgical margin before surgery for malignant musculoskeletal tumors: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yun Hao; Caihong Yang; Jinpeng He
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room.

Authors:  Iulia Andras; Elio Mazzone; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Geert De Naeyer; Matthias N van Oosterom; Sergi Beato; Tessa Buckle; Shane O'Sullivan; Pim J van Leeuwen; Alexander Beulens; Nicolae Crisan; Frederiek D'Hondt; Peter Schatteman; Henk van Der Poel; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Image-guided minimally invasive endopancreatic surgery using a computer-assisted navigation system.

Authors:  Philip C Müller; Caroline Haslebacher; Daniel C Steinemann; Beat P Müller-Stich; Thilo Hackert; Matthias Peterhans; Benjamin Eigl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Breaking down the silos of artificial intelligence in surgery: glossary of terms.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Konstantinos Georgiou; Luca Morelli; Konstantinos Toutouzas; Richard M Satava; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A deep learning framework for real-time 3D model registration in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Erica Padovan; Giorgia Marullo; Leonardo Tanzi; Pietro Piazzolla; Sandro Moos; Francesco Porpiglia; Enrico Vezzetti
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Laparoscopic augmented reality registration for oncological resection site repair.

Authors:  Fabian Joeres; Tonia Mielke; Christian Hansen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 8.  Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Giannone; Emanuele Felli; Zineb Cherkaoui; Pietro Mascagni; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Augmented reality technology in image-guided therapy: State-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Zhuo Zhao; Jasmin Poyhonen; Xin Chen Cai; Frances Sophie Woodley Hooper; Yangmyung Ma; Yihua Hu; Hongliang Ren; Wenzhan Song; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 10.  Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential.

Authors:  Gerd Reis; Mehmet Yilmaz; Jason Rambach; Alain Pagani; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Arkadiusz Miernik; Paul Lesur; Nareg Minaskan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.