Andrea Moglia1, Konstantinos Georgiou2, Luca Morelli3,4, Konstantinos Toutouzas2, Richard M Satava5, Alfred Cuschieri6,7. 1. Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. andmog77@gmail.com. 2. 1st Propaedeutic Surgical Unit, Hippocrateion Athens General Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 3. Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 4. Department of General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 6. Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, 56214, Pisa, Italy. 7. Institute for Medical Science and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD2 1FD, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The literature on artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery has advanced rapidly during the past few years. However, the published studies on AI are mostly reported by computer scientists using their own jargon which is unfamiliar to surgeons. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in using PubMed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome of this review is to provide a glossary with definitions of the commonly used AI terms in surgery to improve their understanding by surgeons. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five studies were included in this review, and 38 AI terms related to surgery were retrieved. Convolutional neural networks were the most frequently culled term by the search, accounting for 74 studies on AI in surgery, followed by classification task (n = 62), artificial neural networks (n = 53), and regression (n = 49). Then, the most frequent expressions were supervised learning (reported in 24 articles), support vector machine (SVM) in 21, and logistic regression in 16. The rest of the 38 terms was seldom mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed glossary can be used by several stakeholders. First and foremost, by residents and attending consultant surgeons, both having to understand the fundamentals of AI when reading such articles. Secondly, junior researchers at the start of their career in Surgical Data Science and thirdly experts working in the regulatory sections of companies involved in the AI Business Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) preparing documents for submission to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or other agencies for approval.
BACKGROUND: The literature on artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery has advanced rapidly during the past few years. However, the published studies on AI are mostly reported by computer scientists using their own jargon which is unfamiliar to surgeons. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in using PubMed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome of this review is to provide a glossary with definitions of the commonly used AI terms in surgery to improve their understanding by surgeons. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five studies were included in this review, and 38 AI terms related to surgery were retrieved. Convolutional neural networks were the most frequently culled term by the search, accounting for 74 studies on AI in surgery, followed by classification task (n = 62), artificial neural networks (n = 53), and regression (n = 49). Then, the most frequent expressions were supervised learning (reported in 24 articles), support vector machine (SVM) in 21, and logistic regression in 16. The rest of the 38 terms was seldom mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed glossary can be used by several stakeholders. First and foremost, by residents and attending consultant surgeons, both having to understand the fundamentals of AI when reading such articles. Secondly, junior researchers at the start of their career in Surgical Data Science and thirdly experts working in the regulatory sections of companies involved in the AI Business Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) preparing documents for submission to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or other agencies for approval.
Authors: Carly R Garrow; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Linhong Li; Martin Wagner; Mona W Schmidt; Sandy Engelhardt; Daniel A Hashimoto; Hannes G Kenngott; Sebastian Bodenstedt; Stefanie Speidel; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Philippe M Burlina; Neil Joshi; Michael Pekala; Katia D Pacheco; David E Freund; Neil M Bressler Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 13.828