Literature DB >> 17122984

Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic liver surgery.

R Santambrogio1, E Opocher, A Pisani Ceretti, M Barabino, M Costa, S Leone, M Montorsi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has gained growing acceptance, but this does not hold for laparoscopic surgery of the liver. This mainly includes diagnostic procedures, interstitial therapies, and treatment of liver cysts. However, the authors believe there is room for a laparoscopic approach to the liver in selected cases.
METHODS: A prospective study of laparoscopic liver resections was undertaken with patients who had preoperative diagnoses of benign lesion and hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis. The inclusion criteria required that hepatic involvement be limited and located in the left or peripheral right segments (segments 2-6), and that the tumor be 5 cm or smaller. The location of the tumor and its transection margin were defined by laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS).
RESULTS: From December 1996, 17 (5%) of 313 liver resections were included in the study. There were 5 benign lesions and 12 hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients. The mean age of the study patients was 59 years (range, 29-79 years). The LUS evaluation identified the presence of new hepatocellular carcinoma nodules in two patients (17%). The resections included 1 bisegmentectomy, 8 segmentectomies, 3 subsegmentectomies, and 3 nonanatomic resections. The mean operative time, including laparoscopic ultrasonography, was 156 +/- 50 min (median, 150 min; range, 60-250 min), and the perioperative blood loss was 190 +/- 97 ml. There was no mortality. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for two patients. Postoperative complications were experienced by 3 of 15 patients, all of them cirrhotics. One of the patients had a wall hematoma, and the remaining two patients had bleeding from a trocar access requiring a laparoscopic reexploration. The mean hospital stay for the whole series was 6.9 +/- 4.9 days (median, 6 days; range, 2-25 days) and 5.6 +/-1.4 days (median, 6 days; range, 2-8 days) for the 15 laparoscopic patients.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic treatment should be considered for selected patients with benign and malignant lesions in the left lobe or frontal segments of the liver. Evaluation by LUS is indispensable to guarantee precise determination of the segmental tumor location and the relationship of the tumor to adjacent vascular or biliary structures, excluding adjacent or adjunctive new lesions. The evolution of laparoscopic hepatectomies probably will depend on the development of new techniques and instrumentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122984     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0738-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  41 in total

1.  Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation.

Authors:  C Couinaud
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Laparoscopic hand-assisted hepatic surgery.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2001-06

3.  Are liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension associated with an increased risk of bleeding during laparoscopy? A retrospective analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R Orlando; F Lirussi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 4.  Laparoscopic hepatectomy: new approach for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  M Hashizume; M Shimada; K Sugimachi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2000

5.  Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hironori Kaneko; Sumito Takagi; Yuichiro Otsuka; Masaru Tsuchiya; Akira Tamura; Toshio Katagiri; Tetsuya Maeda; Tadaaki Shiba
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Laparoscopic liver resections: a single center experience.

Authors:  J L Dulucq; P Wintringer; C Stabilini; J Berticelli; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Laparoscopic hepatectomy].

Authors:  L Biertho; A Waage; M Gagner
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  2002-03

8.  An algorithm for the accurate identification of benign liver lesions.

Authors:  Joseph Kim; Syed A Ahmad; Andrew M Lowy; Joseph F Buell; Linda J Pennington; Jonathan S Moulton; Jeffrey B Matthews; Douglas W Hanto
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Mark J Thomas; Travis C Doty; Keith S Gersin; Todd D Merchen; Manish Gupta; Steven M Rudich; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Laparoscopic liver resection: benefits and controversies.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Tomasz Rogula; Don Selzer
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  29 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic ultrasound].

Authors:  D Wilhelm; H Feussner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Intraoperative ultrasonography during planned liver resections remains an important surgical tool.

Authors:  Herwig Cerwenka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Imaging sequences for intraoperative MR-guided laparoscopic liver resection in 1.0-T high field open MRI.

Authors:  S S Chopra; J Rump; S C Schmidt; F Streitparth; C Seebauer; G Schumacher; I Van der Voort; U Teichgräber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Liver resection with intraoperative and laparoscopic ultrasound: report of 32 cases : Ultrasonic shears device for liver parenchymal transection.

Authors:  Domenico Piccolboni; Francesco Ciccone; Anna Settembre; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic segment VI liver resection using a left lateral decubitus position: a personal modified technique.

Authors:  Giulio Belli; Corrado Fantini; Alberto D'Agostino; Luigi Cioffi; Paolo Limongelli; Gianluca Russo; Andrea Belli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Initial results of MR-guided liver resection in a high-field open MRI.

Authors:  Sascha Santosh Chopra; Sven Christian Schmidt; Robert Eisele; Ulf Teichgräber; Ivo Van der Voort; Christian Seebauer; Florian Streitparth; Guido Schumacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic liver resection: a review of current indications and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Chenyang Jia; Hongyu Li; Ningyuan Wen; Junhua Chen; Yonggang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  Laparoscopic intra-operative ultrasound in liver and pancreas resection: Analysis of 93 cases.

Authors:  D Piccolboni; F Ciccone; A Settembre; F Corcione
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2010-07-06

9.  Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7.

Authors:  S R Coles; M G Besselink; K R Serin; H Alsaati; P Di Gioia; M Samim; N W Pearce; M Abu Hilal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors.

Authors:  Xiu Jun Cai; Jin Yang; Hong Yu; Xiao Liang; Yi Fan Wang; Zi Yi Zhu; Shu Yong Peng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.