Literature DB >> 27796557

Systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.

Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage1, Anke Leichtle2, Rainer Schönweiler3, Ingo Todt4, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner5, Henning Frenzel2, Barbara Wollenberg2.   

Abstract

Introduced in the late 90s, the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is nowadays used for hearing rehabilitation in patients with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) unable to tolerate conventional hearing aids. In experienced hands, the surgical implantation is fast done, safe and highly standardized. Here, we present a systematic review, after more than 15 years of application, to determine the efficacy/effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient satisfaction with the VSB active middle ear implant in the treatment of mild to severe SNHL. A systematic search of electronic databases, investigating the safety and effectiveness of the VSB in SNHL plus medical condition resulted in a total of 1640 papers. After removing duplicates, unrelated articles, screening against inclusion criteria and after in-depth screening, the number decreased to 37 articles. 13 articles were further excluded due to insufficient outcome data. 24 studies remained to be systematically reviewed. Data was searched on safety, efficacy and economical outcomes with the VSB. Safety-oriented outcomes included complication/adverse event rates, damage to the middle/inner ear, revision surgery/explant rate/device failure and mortality. Efficacy outcomes were divided into audiological outcomes, including hearing thresholds, functional gain, speech perception in quiet and noise, speech recognition thresholds, real ear insertion gain and subjective outcomes determined by questionnaires and patient-oriented scales. Data related to quality of life (QALY, ICER) were considered under economical outcomes. The VSB turns out to be a highly reliable and a safe device which significantly improves perception of speech in noisy situations with a high sound quality. In addition, the subjective benefit of the VSB was found to be mostly significant in all studies. Finally, implantation with the VSB proved to be a cost-effective and justified health care intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; Review; Sensorineural hearing loss; VSB; Vibrant Soundbridge

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796557     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4361-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  27 in total

1.  Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  S M Pok; M Schlögel; K Böheim
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-05

2.  Hearing in noise with the vibrant Soundbridge middle-ear implant.

Authors:  P Garin; M Debaty; C Galle
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2005-09

3.  Retrospective of 1000 patients implanted with a vibrant Soundbridge middle-ear implant.

Authors:  S Labassi; M Beliaeff
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2005-09

4.  A multicenter study of the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant: early clinical results and experience.

Authors:  B Fraysse; J P Lavieille; S Schmerber; V Enée; E Truy; C Vincent; F M Vaneecloo; O Sterkers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device.

Authors:  U Fisch; C W Cremers; T Lenarz; B Weber; G Babighian; A S Uziel; D W Proops; A F O'Connor; R Charachon; J Helms; B Fraysse
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].

Authors:  T Lenarz; B P Weber; P R Issing; D Gnadeberg; K Ambjørnsen; K F Mack; M Winter
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.057

7.  The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population.

Authors:  D H Wilson; P G Walsh; L Sanchez; A C Davis; A W Taylor; G Tucker; I Meagher
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Vibrant Soundbridge implantable hearing device: critical review and single-surgeon short- and long-term results.

Authors:  Charles M Luetje; Sandra A Brown; Robert D Cullen
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.697

9.  [Rehabilitation of high frequency hearing loss: use of an active middle ear implant].

Authors:  K Böheim; A Nahler; M Schlögel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Klaus Boeheim; Stefan-Marcel Pok; Max Schloegel; Peter Filzmoser
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  10 in total

1.  Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  [Influence of directional microphones on listening effort in middle ear implant users].

Authors:  Daniela Hollfelder; Lukas Prein; Tim Jürgens; Anke Leichtle; Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.330

3.  Evidence gaps in economic analyses of hearing healthcare: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ethan D Borre; Mohamed M Diab; Austin Ayer; Gloria Zhang; Susan D Emmett; Debara L Tucci; Blake S Wilson; Kamaria Kaalund; Osondu Ogbuoji; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-08

4.  Design Study of a Round Window Piezoelectric Transducer for Active Middle Ear Implants.

Authors:  Dong Ho Shin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Intraoperative quantification of floating mass transducer coupling quality in active middle ear implants: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Torsten Rahne; Stefan K Plontke; Tobias Oberhoffner; Rüdiger Dahl; Robert Mlynski; Oliver Dziemba; Aristotelis Aristeidou; Maria Gadyuchko; Sven Koscielny; Sebastian Hoth; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Alexander Müller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Modified Power Piston Versus Simultaneous Stapedotomy With Hearing Aids in Otosclerosis: A Follow-Up Study Exploring Speech Recognition, Quality of Life and Usage of Device.

Authors:  Daniel Dejaco; David Riedl; Anna Elisabeth Cassar; Timo Gottfried; Thomas Rasse; Natalie Fischer; Armina Kreuzer-Simonyan; Josef Seebacher; Herbert Riechelmann; Thomas Keintzel; Joachim Schmutzhard
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Subjective Sound Quality Detection (HISQUI) over Time after Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation.

Authors:  Christof Buhl; Valeria Schindler; Flurin Pfiffner; Dorothe Veraguth; Alexander Huber; Christof Röösli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Clinical feasibility of a novel test setup for objective measurements using the VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE.

Authors:  Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Philipp Schörg; Stefan Edlinger; Marlene Ploder; Astrid Magele
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-06

9.  Hearing Loss Characteristics of Workers with Hypertension Exposed to Occupational Noise: A Cross-Sectional Study of 270,033 Participants.

Authors:  Boshen Wang; Lei Han; Simin Dai; Xiuting Li; Wenyan Cai; Dandan Yang; Lin Chen; Ning Wang; Baoli Zhu; Juan Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Effects of Vibrant Soundbridge on tinnitus accompanied by sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Jeon Mi Lee; Hyun Jin Lee; In Seok Moon; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.