Literature DB >> 11698826

Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device.

U Fisch1, C W Cremers, T Lenarz, B Weber, G Babighian, A S Uziel, D W Proops, A F O'Connor, R Charachon, J Helms, B Fraysse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the full degree and range of benefits provided by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB; Symphonix Devices, Inc., San Jose, CA, U.S.A.) and analyze pre-and postoperative results of audiologic tests. STUDY
DESIGN: Single-subject study with each subject serving as his or her own control.
SETTING: Multicenter clinical study conducted at 10 centers in Europe. PATIENTS: 47 patients who met the selection criteria for participation in the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Implantation of the VSB direct-drive middle ear hearing device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average change in unaided thresholds with the patient wearing headphones at each frequency pre-and postsurgery was measured. A mean threshold change less than 5 dB across all frequencies was considered clinically nonsignificant.
RESULTS: 47 patients had successful surgery for implantation and fitting with the VSB device.
CONCLUSION: The VSB is a new middle ear implant device that can be used safely in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11698826     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200111000-00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  24 in total

1.  A longitudinal study on postoperative hearing thresholds with the Vibrant Soundbridge device.

Authors:  C Vincent; B Fraysse; J-P Lavieille; E Truy; O Sterkers; F-M Vaneecloo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  [Semi-implantable hearing aids for sensorineural hearing loss and combined hearing loss: experiences at the German Armed Forces Hospital in Ulm].

Authors:  M Tisch; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  The vibrant® soundbridge™.

Authors:  Deborah Arthur
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-06

4. 

Authors:  H-G Kempf; A Büchner; T Stöver
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5. 

Authors:  H-G Kempf; A Büchner; T Stöver
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  [The Vibrant Soundbridge as an active implant in middle ear surgery].

Authors:  T Beleites; M Bornitz; M Neudert; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage; Anke Leichtle; Rainer Schönweiler; Ingo Todt; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Henning Frenzel; Barbara Wollenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Park; Tae Hoon Kong; Jin Soon Chang; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Fully implantable Otologics MET Carina device for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Preliminary surgical and clinical results.

Authors:  L Bruschini; F Forli; A Santoro; P Bruschini; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  A tri-coil bellows-type round window transducer with improved frequency characteristics for middle-ear implants.

Authors:  Dong Ho Shin; Ki Woong Seong; Sunil Puria; Kyu-Yup Lee; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.