Literature DB >> 16368126

Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.

Sang Chul Chong1, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of exogenous and endogenous attention on initial selection in binocular rivalry. Experiment 1 used superimposed +/-45 degrees gratings viewed dioptically for 3s, followed by a brief contrast increment in one of the gratings to direct exogenous attention to that grating. After a brief blank period, dichoptic stimuli were presented for various durations (100-700 ms). Exogenous attention strongly influenced which stimulus was initially dominant in binocular rivalry, replicating an earlier report (Mitchell, Stoner, & Reynolds. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature, 429, 410-413). In Experiment 2, endogenous attention was manipulated by having participants track one of two oblique gratings both of which independently and continuously changed their orientations and spatial frequencies during a 5s period. The initially dominant grating was most often the one whose orientation matched the grating correctly tracked using endogenous attention. In Experiment 3, we measured the strength of both exogenous and endogenous attention by varying the contrast of one of two rival gratings when attention was previously directed to that grating. The contrast of the attended grating had to be reduced by an amount in the neighborhood of 0.3 log-units, to counteract attention's boost to initial dominance. Evidently both exogenous and endogenous attention can influence initial dominance of binocular rivalry, effectively boosting the stimulus strength of the attended rival stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368126     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  46 in total

Review 1.  The emotion paradox in the aging brain.

Authors:  Mara Mather
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND NEURAL DYNAMICS.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee; David Heeger
Journal:  Psichologija (Vilniaus Univ)       Date:  2008-06-01

3.  Attentional modulation of primary interoceptive and exteroceptive cortices.

Authors:  Norman A S Farb; Zindel V Segal; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  When audiovisual correspondence disturbs visual processing.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Won Mok Shim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  The influence of chromatic context on binocular color rivalry: perception and neural representation.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Colin W G Clifford; Frank Tong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.