Literature DB >> 27790598

Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.

Neha Jain1, Manisha Gulati1, Meenu Garg1, Chetan Pathak2.   

Abstract

The choice of implant length is an essential factor in deciding the survival rates of these implants and the overall success of the prosthesis. Placing an implant in the posterior part of the maxilla and mandible has always been very critical due to poor bone quality and quantity. Long implants can be placed in association with complex surgical procedures such as sinus lift and bone augmentation. These techniques are associated with higher cost, increased treatment time and greater morbidity. Hence, there is need for a less invasive treatment option in areas of poor bone quantity and quality. Data related to survival rates of short implants, their design and prosthetic considerations has been compiled and structured in this manuscript with emphasis on the indications, advantages of short implants and critical biomechanical factors to be taken into consideration when choosing to place them. Studies have shown that comparable success rates can be achieved with short implants as those with long implants by decreasing the lateral forces to the prosthesis, eliminating cantilevers, increasing implant surface area and improving implant to abutment connection. Short implants can be considered as an effective treatment alternative in resorbed ridges. Short implants can be considered as a viable treatment option in atrophic ridge cases in order to avoid complex surgical procedures required to place long implants. With improvement in the implant surface geometry and surface texture, there is an increase in the bone implant contact area which provides a good primary stability during osseo-integration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implants; Functional surface area; Implant length; Poor bone quality

Year:  2016        PMID: 27790598      PMCID: PMC5072098          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21838.8550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  37 in total

1.  Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years.

Authors:  O Bahat
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Gorka Orive
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Franck Renouard; David Nisand
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants.

Authors:  Georges Tawil; Nadim Aboujaoude; Roland Younan
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 x 5.7-mm implants.

Authors:  Michael A Gentile; Sung-Kiang Chuang; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Short dental implants as a treatment option: results from an observational study in a single private practice.

Authors:  Murray L Arlin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Short dental implants: an emerging concept in implant treatment.

Authors:  Ashwaq Ali Al-Hashedi; Tara Bai Taiyeb Ali; Norsiah Yunus
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year follow-up of Osseotite implants.

Authors:  Ronnie Goené; Carlo Bianchesi; Markus Hüerzeler; Ricardo Del Lupo; Tiziano Testori; Mithriadade Davarpanah; Ziad Jalbout
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.454

9.  Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer.

Authors:  Eitan Mijiritsky; Ziv Mazor; Adi Lorean; Liran Levin
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.454

10.  The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation.

Authors:  Terrence J Griffin; Wai S Cheung
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  8 in total

1.  Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.

Authors:  João Henrique Fortes; Christiano de Oliveira-Santos; Wilson Matsumoto; Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta; Camila Tirapelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Novel expandable short dental implants in situations with reduced vertical bone height-technical note and first results.

Authors:  Waldemar Reich; Ramona Schweyen; Christian Heinzelmann; Jeremias Hey; Bilal Al-Nawas; Alexander Walter Eckert
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-10-30

3.  7-mm-long dental implants: retrospective clinical outcomes in medically compromised patients.

Authors:  Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen; Mi Young Eo; Yun Ju Cho; Hoon Myoung; Soung Min Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Yan; Xinyu Wu; Meiying Su; Fang Hua; Bin Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sachin Haribhau Chaware; Vrushali Thakare; Ritu Chaudhary; Ajit Jankar; Smruti Thakkar; Sidesh Borse
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05

Review 7.  Recent advances in dental implants.

Authors:  Do Gia Khang Hong; Ji-Hyeon Oh
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-11-05

8.  Influence of short implants geometry on primary stability.

Authors:  J González-Serrano; P Molinero-Mourelle; B Pardal-Peláez; L-M Sáez-Alcaide; R Ortega; J López-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.