Literature DB >> 27785534

Three-dimensional printing and patient-specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation?

L Maini1, A Sharma1, S Jha4, A Sharma1, A Tiwari1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Due to the complexity of acetabulum, achieving anatomical contouring intra-operatively is difficult for surgeon. A 3D (dimensional) real model can facilitate us both in contouring the plate pre-operatively and in better pre-operative planning. Patient-specific pre-contoured plate in acetabular fracture has been studied by few researchers but randomized case-control study was lacking. Hence, we conducted a case-control study to evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific pre-contoured plate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective randomized case control study was conducted. 21 patients were included. 10 patients were distributed in "case" group and remaining 11 in "control" group. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Displaced acetabulum fractures with displacement of ≥3 mm in adults who reported within 3 weeks of injury. Exclusion criteria were: Open fractures, associated Morel-Lavallée lesion and patients with >3 weeks old fracture. In case group, patient-specific real 3D model of fractured acetabulum was generated using rapid prototyping technology and plates were contoured pre-operatively. Control group was treated using intra-operative contoured plates. Both the groups were compared using parameters: Blood loss, Surgery time, post-operative reduction on X-ray, post-surgical residual displacement and reduction achieved as evaluated by CT scan.
RESULTS: Reduced blood loss (100 ml less in case group) and surgical time (12 min less in case group) and better post-operative reduction were observed in case than control. In control group, 4 patients even had step of 2-3 mm, which was not seen in case group. All the pre-contoured plates fitted well to the pelvis intra-operatively. Reduction achieved as evaluated by CT was more in "case" group with statistically significant outcomes (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific pre-contoured plate made using 3D model is a better implant than intra-operatively contoured plate. Real-time 3D pelvis model is an accurate technique for pre-operative planning in acetabular fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum fracture; Patient specific; Pre-contoured; Rapid prototyping; Reconstruction plate; Three-dimensional printing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27785534     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0738-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  22 in total

1.  Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury.

Authors:  J M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Three-dimensional CT modeling versus traditional radiology techniques in treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  G A Brown; K Firoozbakhsh; R J Gehlert
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2001

3.  The use of precontoured humeral locking plates in the management of displaced proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Philip M DeMola; Don Roman; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The usefulness of computed tomography following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  K O'Shea; J F Quinlan; K Waheed; O H Brady
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.118

5.  An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results.

Authors:  Jürgen Fornaro; Marius Keel; Matthias Harders; Borut Marincek; Gábor Székely; Thomas Frauenfelder
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules.

Authors:  Matej Cimerman; Anze Kristan
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 7.  Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Shirish Deshpande; Darshana D Rasalkar; Abhay Kuthe; Bhawan K Paunipagar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  CT-generated 3-dimensional models for complex acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  S Munjal; S S Leopold; D Kornreich; S Shott; H A Finn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  [Acetabulum fractures].

Authors:  P M Rommens; M H Hessmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery.

Authors:  Fangyang Shen; Bailiang Chen; Qingshan Guo; Yue Qi; Yue Shen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  20 in total

1.  Application of the Guiding Template Designed by Three-dimensional Printing Data for the Insertion of Sacroiliac Screws: a New Clinical Technique.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Wu Zhou; Tian Xia; Jing Liu; Bo-Bin Mi; Liang-Cong Hu; Zeng-Wu Shao; Guo-Hui Liu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-07

2.  A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Anıl Murat Öztürk; Onur Süer; Suzan Şirintürk; Kemal Aktuğlu; Figen Govsa; Mehmet Asım Özer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  Pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques for the surgical management of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Chun-Liang Hsu; Yu-Ching Chou; Yuan-Ta Li; Jia-En Chen; Chun-Chi Hung; Chia-Chun Wu; Hsain-Chung Shen; Tsu-Te Yeh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [3D printing in orthopedic and trauma surgery education and training : Possibilities and fields of application].

Authors:  Simon Weidert; Sebastian Andress; Eduardo Suero; Christopher Becker; Maximilian Hartel; Maren Behle; Christian Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  3D printing- creating a blueprint for the future of orthopedics: Current concept review and the road ahead!

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Rakesh Bhansali; Prashant Pawar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 6.  3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: A technological marvel.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Mohit Kumar Patralekh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Full endoscopic anterior intrapelvic plate osteosynthesis: a cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  Maximilian J Hartel; Gerrit Althoff; Stefan Wolter; Benjamin Ondruschka; Eric Dietz; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Darius M Thiesen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  3D printing in designing of anatomical posterior column plate.

Authors:  Lalit Maini; Abhishek Mishra; Gaurang Agarwal; Tarun Verma; Amit Sharma; Amit Tyagi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-30

Review 9.  Publication trends and knowledge mapping in 3D printing in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Abhishek Vaish; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-30

10.  3D printing guide plate for accurate hemicortical bone tumor resection in metaphysis of distal femoral: a technical note.

Authors:  Hongwei Wu; Shuo Yang; Jianfan Liu; Linqin Li; Yi Luo; Zixun Dai; Xin Wang; Xinyu Yao; Feng Zhou; Xian'an Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.