Literature DB >> 30202148

Publication trends and knowledge mapping in 3D printing in orthopaedics.

Raju Vaishya1, Mohit Kumar Patralekh2, Abhishek Vaish1, Amit Kumar Agarwal1, Vipul Vijay1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three dimensional (3D) printing, also called 'rapid prototyping' and 'additive manufacturing' is considered as a "second industrial revolution." With this rapidly emerging technology, CT or MR images are used for the creation of graspable objects from 3D reconstituted images. Patient-specific anatomical models can be, therefore, manufactured efficiently. These can enhance surgeon's understanding of their patients' patho-anatomy and also help in precise preoperative planning. The 3D printed patient-specific guides can also help in achieving accurate bony cuts, precise implant placement, and nice surgical results. Customized implants, casts, orthoses and prosthetics can be created to match an individual patient's anatomy. The 3D printing of individualized artificial cartilage scaffolds and 3D bioprinting are some other areas of growing interest. We aim to study the publication trends in 3D printing as applied to the field of orthopaedics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed to extract all papers related to 3D printing applications in orthopaedics and allied sciences on the Pubmed, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases. Suitable keywords and boolean operators ("3D Printing" OR "3-dimensional printing" OR "3D printed" OR "additive manufacturing" OR "rapid prototyping") AND (''Orthopaedics" OR "Orthopaedics'') were used, in May 2018. Search was attempted in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness (DARE) databases, using keywords 3d printing orthopaedics. A similar search was repeated in pubmed and SCOPUS to get more specific papers.No limits were set on the period or evidence level, as 3D printing in orthopaedics is relatively new and evidence available is usually limited to low-level studies. Trends in a publication on these topics were analyzed, focussing on publications, type of research (basic science or clinical), type of publication, authors, institution, and country. Some citations received by these papers were also analyzed in SCOPUS and Web of Science. MS Excel (2008 - Mac version) and VOS Viewer1.6.8 (2018- Mac version) software were used to analyze the search results and for citation mapping respectively. We also identified top 10 most cited articles in the field.
RESULTS: An increasing trend in publications in 3D printing-related work in orthopedic surgery and related fields was observed in the recent past. A search on Pubmed using the above strategy revealed 389 documents. A similar search revealed 653 documents on SCOPUS, many (314) of which were from an engineering background and only 271 were related to medicine. No papers were found in the Cochrane database. Search on TRIP database revealed 195 papers. A similar search revealed 237 papers on orthopedic applications on Pubmed and 269 documents on SCOPUS, whereas a search on Web of Science revealed only 23 papers. Publication trends were then analyzed on data derived from SCOPUS database. Overall, most papers were published from China, followed by United States, United Kingdom, and India.
CONCLUSION: There has been an upsurge of interest in 3D printing in orthopedic surgery, as is evident by an increasing trend in research and publications in this area in the recent years. Presently, 3D printing is in a primitive stage in the field of orthopedic surgery as our knowledge is still insufficient, and costs and learning curve are somewhat high. However, looking at latest publication trends, we are enthusiastic that it holds the key to future in orthopaedics and trauma cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Arthroplasty; Orthopaedics; Rapid prototyping; Spine

Year:  2018        PMID: 30202148      PMCID: PMC6128796          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  46 in total

Review 1.  A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Billiet; Mieke Vandenhaute; Jorg Schelfhout; Sandra Van Vlierberghe; Peter Dubruel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes.

Authors:  Sanna M Peltola; Ferry P W Melchels; Dirk W Grijpma; Minna Kellomäki
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Comment on Conteduca et al.: patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Application of Rapid Prototyping Pelvic Model for Patients with DDH to Facilitate Arthroplasty Planning: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Deng Li; Ruo-fan Ma; Bertram Barden; Yue Ding
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Shirish Deshpande; Darshana D Rasalkar; Abhay Kuthe; Bhawan K Paunipagar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Mingyuan Yang; Chao Li; Yanming Li; Yingchuan Zhao; Xianzhao Wei; Guoyou Zhang; Jianping Fan; Haijian Ni; Ziqiang Chen; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Scientometric trends and knowledge maps of global health systems research.

Authors:  Qiang Yao; Kai Chen; Lan Yao; Peng-hui Lyu; Tian-an Yang; Fei Luo; Shan-quan Chen; Lu-yang He; Zhi-yong Liu
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 10.  Particulate matter and atherosclerosis: a bibliometric analysis of original research articles published in 1973-2014.

Authors:  Feifei Wang; Xiaofeng Jia; Xianliang Wang; Yongdong Zhao; Weidong Hao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  14 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Are 3D-printed Models of Tibial Plateau Fractures a Useful Addition to Understanding Fractures for Junior Surgeons?

Authors:  Peter N Mittwede
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Impact of industry 4.0 to create advancements in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Mohd Javaid; Abid Haleem
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-18

3.  The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Tabitha Roth; Philipp Fürnstahl; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Reto Sutter; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Conceptual evolution of 3D printing in orthopedic surgery and traumatology: from "do it yourself" to "point of care manufacturing".

Authors:  Jose Antonio Calvo-Haro; Javier Pascau; Lydia Mediavilla-Santos; Pablo Sanz-Ruiz; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Javier Vaquero-Martín; Rubén Perez-Mañanes
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Three-dimensional imaging, modeling, and printing in the correction of a complex clavicle malunion.

Authors:  Fernando Menor Fusaro; Pierluigi Di Felice Ardente; Miguel Pérez Abad; Carles Yanguas Muns
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 6.  The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry Robb; Gemma Scrimgeour; Piers Boshier; Anna Przedlacka; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown; Fernando Bello; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Virtual preoperative planning and 3D printing are valuable for the management of complex orthopaedic trauma.

Authors:  Abhishek Mishra; Tarun Verma; Abhishek Vaish; Riya Vaish; Raju Vaishya; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-07

8.  The utilization of computer planning and 3D-printed guide in the surgical management of a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion.

Authors:  Pierluigi Di Felice Ardente; Fernando Menor Fusaro; Miguel Pérez Abad; Francisco Soldado; Jordi Querolt Coll
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-26

9.  Integration of Three-dimensional Technologies in Orthopedics: A Tool for Preoperative Planning of Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Authors:  Flaviu Moldovan; Adrian Gligor; Tiberiu Bataga
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-12

Review 10.  A review and guide to creating patient specific 3D printed anatomical models from MRI for benign gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Teresa E Flaxman; Carly M Cooke; Olivier X Miguel; Adnan M Sheikh; Sukhbir S Singh
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.