| Literature DB >> 27784268 |
D Góngora1,2, M Domínguez3, M A Bobes4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diffusion tensor imaging technique (DTI) combined with tractography methods, has achieved the tridimensional reconstruction of white matter tracts in the brain. It allows their characterization in vivo in a non-invasive way. However, one of the largest sources of variability originates from the location of regions of interest, is therefore necessary schemes which make it possible to establish a protocol to be insensitive to variations in drawing thereof. The purpose of this paper is to stablish a reliable protocol to reconstruct ten prominent tracts of white matter and characterize them according to volume, fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity. Also we explored the relationship among these factors with gender and hemispheric symmetry.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Mean diffusivity; Volume; White matter tracts
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27784268 PMCID: PMC5082362 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0163-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Statistical description of the sample
| Subjects (n) | School levela | Agea | Intelligence quotienta | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | 44 | 12.44 ± 2.46 | 38.75 ± 9.95 | 91.14 ± 11.87 |
| Men | 40 | 11.78 ± 2.44 | 31.00 ± 8.97 | 90.72 ± 11.44 |
| Total | 84 | 12.12 ± 2.46 | 35.06 ± 10.21 | 90.94 ± 11.60 |
aMean values ± standard deviation
Statistical description of Volume, FA and MD in the sample
| Volume (cm3)a | FAa | MD (×10−3mm2s−1)a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) | Left | 16.18 ± 6.04 | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.63 ± 0.14 |
| Right | 11.93 ± 4.43 | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 0.59 ± 0.15 | |
| Cingulate gyrus associated cingulum (CGC) | Left | 6.62 ± 3.00 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.58 ± 0.16 |
| Right | 5.42 ± 2.97 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 0.60 ± 0.14 | |
| Hippocampal gyrus associated cingulum (CGH) | Left | 5.69 ± 3.11 | 0.36 ± 0.09 | 0.68 ± 0.21 |
| Right | 6.52 ± 4.30 | 0.35 ± 0.08 | 0.70 ± 0.19 | |
| Cortico-spinal tract (CST) | Left | 5.93 ± 3.39 | 0.56 ± 0.08 | 0.64 ± 0.15 |
| Right | 5.13 ± 3.07 | 0.58 ± 0.10 | 0.62 ± 0.18 | |
| Forceps major (Fmj) | 22.98 ± 9.89 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.16 | |
| Forceps minor (Fmn) | 38.27 ± 10.90 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.17 | |
| Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) | Left | 23.88 ± 8.59 | 0.48 ± 0.09 | 0.58 ± 0.16 |
| Right | 26.96 ± 8.18 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.60 ± 0.15 | |
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) | Left | 12.59 ± 5.54 | 0.47 ± 0.09 | 0.59 ± 0.17 |
| Right | 9.97 ± 4.57 | 0.46 ± 0.09 | 0.60 ± 0.15 | |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) | Left | 16.87 ± 5.79 | 0.47 ± 0.09 | 0.54 ± 0.16 |
| Right | 12.40 ± 6.22 | 0.46 ± 0.08 | 0.55 ± 0.15 | |
| Uncinate fasciculus (UNC) | Left | 7.81 ± 3.37 | 0.37 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.17 |
| Right | 7.11 ± 3.74 | 0.38 ± 0.07 | 0.63 ± 0.17 |
aMean values ± standard deviation
Fig. 1Volume of studied tracts by gender. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. (L: left hemisphere; R: right hemisphere)
Fig. 2Mean fractional anisotropy of studied tracts by gender. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. (L: left hemisphere; R: right hemisphere)
Fig. 3Mean diffusivity of studied tracts by gender. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. (L: left hemisphere; R: right hemisphere)