BACKGROUND: Sex-specific trajectories in white matter development during adolescence may help explain cognitive and behavioral divergences between males and females. Knowledge of sex differences in typically developing adolescents can provide a basis for interpreting sexual dimorphisms in abilities and actions. METHOD: We examined 58 healthy adolescents (12-14years of age) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Diffusion parameters fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial diffusivities (AD) were subjected to whole-brain voxel-wise group comparisons using tract-based spatial statistics. Sex differences in white matter microstructure were examined in relation to pubertal development. RESULTS: Early adolescent females (n=29) evidenced higher FA in the right superior corona radiata, higher FA and AD in bilateral corticospinal tracts (≥164μl, p<.01), and lower MD in the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and left forceps major (≥164μl, p<.01) than age-matched males (n=29). Males did not show any areas of higher FA or lower MD than females, but had higher AD in the right superior longitudinal fasciculus, ILF, and forceps minor (≥ 164μl, p<.01). Pubertal stage did not account for sex disparities. CONCLUSION: In early adolescence, females' motor tracts may reflect widespread changes, while males may undergo relatively more microstructural change in projection and association fibers.
BACKGROUND: Sex-specific trajectories in white matter development during adolescence may help explain cognitive and behavioral divergences between males and females. Knowledge of sex differences in typically developing adolescents can provide a basis for interpreting sexual dimorphisms in abilities and actions. METHOD: We examined 58 healthy adolescents (12-14years of age) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Diffusion parameters fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial diffusivities (AD) were subjected to whole-brain voxel-wise group comparisons using tract-based spatial statistics. Sex differences in white matter microstructure were examined in relation to pubertal development. RESULTS: Early adolescent females (n=29) evidenced higher FA in the right superior corona radiata, higher FA and AD in bilateral corticospinal tracts (≥164μl, p<.01), and lower MD in the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and left forceps major (≥164μl, p<.01) than age-matched males (n=29). Males did not show any areas of higher FA or lower MD than females, but had higher AD in the right superior longitudinal fasciculus, ILF, and forceps minor (≥ 164μl, p<.01). Pubertal stage did not account for sex disparities. CONCLUSION: In early adolescence, females' motor tracts may reflect widespread changes, while males may undergo relatively more microstructural change in projection and association fibers.
Authors: J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Rhoshel K Lenroot; Nitin Gogtay; Deanna K Greenstein; Elizabeth Molloy Wells; Gregory L Wallace; Liv S Clasen; Jonathan D Blumenthal; Jason Lerch; Alex P Zijdenbos; Alan C Evans; Paul M Thompson; Jay N Giedd Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-04-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Susanna L Fryer; Lawrence R Frank; Andrea D Spadoni; Rebecca J Theilmann; Bonnie J Nagel; Alecia D Schweinsburg; Susan F Tapert Journal: Brain Cogn Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: J S Perrin; G Leonard; M Perron; G B Pike; A Pitiot; L Richer; S Veillette; Z Pausova; T Paus Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kilian M Pohl; Edith V Sullivan; Torsten Rohlfing; Weiwei Chu; Dongjin Kwon; B Nolan Nichols; Yong Zhang; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert; Kevin Cummins; Wesley K Thompson; Ty Brumback; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Devin Prouty; Michael D De Bellis; James T Voyvodic; Duncan B Clark; Claudiu Schirda; Bonnie J Nagel; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Birkan Tunç; Berkan Solmaz; Drew Parker; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Mark A Elliott; Monica E Calkins; Kosha Ruparel; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Ragini Verma Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Madhura Ingalhalikar; Alex Smith; Drew Parker; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Ragini Verma Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rachel E Thayer; Tiffany J Callahan; Barbara J Weiland; Kent E Hutchison; Angela D Bryan Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Andrew Etchell; Aditi Adhikari; Lauren S Weinberg; Ai Leen Choo; Emily O Garnett; Ho Ming Chow; Soo-Eun Chang Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: David R Roalf; J Eric Schmitt; Simon N Vandekar; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Russell T Shinohara; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Karthik Prabhakaran; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Elaine H Zackai; Ruben C Gur; Beverly S Emanuel; Raquel E Gur Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 2.376