BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter tract-specific imaging will probably become a major component of clinical neuroradiology. Fiber tracking with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is widely used, but variability is substantial. This article reports the ranges of MR imaging appearance and right-left asymmetry of healthy corticospinal tracts (CST) reconstructed with DTI. METHODS: For 20 healthy volunteers, whole-brain DTI data were coregistered with maps of absolute T1 and T2 relaxation times and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), all acquired at 3T. For each individual, the 2 reconstructed CSTs and their asymmetry were analyzed with respect to the number of fibers reconstructed; tract volume; and individual MR imaging parameters restricted to the tracts. Interscan variability was estimated by repeat imaging of 8 individuals. RESULTS: Reconstructed fiber number and tract volume are highly variable, rendering them insensitive to abnormalities in disease. Individual tract-restricted MR imaging parameters are more constrained, and their population averages and normal ranges are reported. The average population asymmetry is generally zero; therefore, normal ranges for an index of asymmetry are reported. By way of example, CST-restricted MR imaging parameters and their asymmetries are shown to be abnormal in an individual with multiple sclerosis who had a lesion affecting the CST. CONCLUSIONS: The results constitute a normative dataset for the following imaging parameters of the CST: T1, T2, MTR, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, transverse diffusivity, and the 3 diffusion tensor eigenvalues. These data can be used to identify, characterize, and establish the significance of changes in diseases that affect the CST.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter tract-specific imaging will probably become a major component of clinical neuroradiology. Fiber tracking with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is widely used, but variability is substantial. This article reports the ranges of MR imaging appearance and right-left asymmetry of healthy corticospinal tracts (CST) reconstructed with DTI. METHODS: For 20 healthy volunteers, whole-brain DTI data were coregistered with maps of absolute T1 and T2 relaxation times and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), all acquired at 3T. For each individual, the 2 reconstructed CSTs and their asymmetry were analyzed with respect to the number of fibers reconstructed; tract volume; and individual MR imaging parameters restricted to the tracts. Interscan variability was estimated by repeat imaging of 8 individuals. RESULTS: Reconstructed fiber number and tract volume are highly variable, rendering them insensitive to abnormalities in disease. Individual tract-restricted MR imaging parameters are more constrained, and their population averages and normal ranges are reported. The average population asymmetry is generally zero; therefore, normal ranges for an index of asymmetry are reported. By way of example, CST-restricted MR imaging parameters and their asymmetries are shown to be abnormal in an individual with multiple sclerosis who had a lesion affecting the CST. CONCLUSIONS: The results constitute a normative dataset for the following imaging parameters of the CST: T1, T2, MTR, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, transverse diffusivity, and the 3 diffusion tensor eigenvalues. These data can be used to identify, characterize, and establish the significance of changes in diseases that affect the CST.
Authors: Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Hangyi Jiang; Setsu Wakana; Xavier Golay; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Seth A Smith; Arzu Ozturk; Sheena K Farrell; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Daniel S Reich; Seth A Smith; Kathleen M Zackowski; Eliza M Gordon-Lipkin; Craig K Jones; Jonathan A D Farrell; Susumu Mori; Peter C M van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ihssan A Abdul-Kareem; Andrej Stancak; Laura M Parkes; May Al-Ameen; Jamaan Alghamdi; Faten M Aldhafeeri; Karl Embleton; David Morris; Vanessa Sluming Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Jiwon Oh; Shiv Saidha; Min Chen; Seth A Smith; Jerry Prince; Craig Jones; Marie Diener-West; Peter C M van Zijl; Daniel S Reich; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jungsu S Oh; Marek Kubicki; Gudrun Rosenberger; Sylvain Bouix; James J Levitt; Robert W McCarley; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Martha E Shenton Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Benedetta Bodini; Mara Cercignani; Ahmed Toosy; Nicola De Stefano; David H Miller; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 5.038