Literature DB >> 27783163

Evaluation of Local and Distant Recurrence Patterns in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer According to Age.

Julia C Radosa1,2, Anne Eaton3, Michelle Stempel1, Amrin Khander1, Cornelia Liedtke4, Erich-Franz Solomayer2, Maria Karsten1, Melissa Pilewskie1, Monica Morrow1, Tari A King5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype and young patient age are both associated with an increased risk of local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR). In young women with TNBC, it is unclear whether subtype or patient age is driving prognosis.
METHODS: Patients treated for primary TNBC from 1998 to 2011 were identified from the breast surgery database. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were compared between patients <40 and ≥40 years of age at diagnosis. Multivariate models were used to identify factors independently associated with LR and DR.
RESULTS: Among 1930 patients with TNBC, 289 (15 %) were <40 and 1641 (85 %) were ≥40 years of age at diagnosis. Younger patients were more likely to present with higher stage disease and more likely to receive mastectomy (p < 0.01), axillary node dissection (p < 0.01), and chemotherapy (p < 0.01). At a median follow-up of 74 (0-201.1) months, there was no difference in LR or disease-free survival (DFS) by age group [5-year LR = 3.9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.5-6.2) vs. 4.5 % (95 % CI 3.5-5.6) and 5-year DFS = 75.3 % (95 % CI 70.2-80.7) vs. 77.7 % (95 % CI 75.6-79.8), p = 0.94] in patients aged <40 and ≥40 years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, larger tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and nodal positivity were associated with increased risk of DR. Age and type of surgery were not significantly associated with either outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Young age at diagnosis is not an independent risk factor for LR or DR in patients with TNBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27783163      PMCID: PMC5408739          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5631-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  31 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of breast cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonis Valachis; Andreas D Nearchou; Pehr Lind
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Pathology of hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Leonard Da Silva; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 3.  Optimal surgical management for high-risk populations.

Authors:  Tari A King; Melissa Pilewskie; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 4.  Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological considerations and recommendations.

Authors:  P Boyle
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Prognostic significance of young age (<35 years) by subtype based on ER, PR, and HER2 status in breast cancer: a nationwide registry-based study.

Authors:  Eun-Kyu Kim; Woo Chul Noh; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Triple-negative or HER2-positive status predicts higher rates of locoregional recurrence in node-positive breast cancer patients after mastectomy.

Authors:  Shu-Lian Wang; Ye-Xiong Li; Yong-Wen Song; Wei-Hu Wang; Jing Jin; Yue-Ping Liu; Xin-Fan Liu; Zi-Hao Yu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Effect of margin width on local recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Alice Ho; Emily Orell; Michelle Stempel; Yu Chen; Anne Eaton; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: histologic subtyping to inform the outcome.

Authors:  Emilia Montagna; Patrick Maisonneuve; Nicole Rotmensz; Giuseppe Cancello; Monica Iorfida; Alessandra Balduzzi; Viviana Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Alberto Luini; Giancarlo Pruneri; Luca Bottiglieri; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Aron Goldhirsch; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Colleoni
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Effect of breast-conserving therapy versus radical mastectomy on prognosis for young women with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Niels Kroman; Helle Holtveg; Jan Wohlfahrt; Maj-Britt Jensen; Henning T Mouridsen; Mogens Blichert-Toft; Mads Melbye
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast cancer in young women: have the prognostic implications of breast cancer subtypes changed over time?

Authors:  Wilson Sheridan; Tyldesley Scott; Speers Caroline; Zheng Yvonne; Bernstein Vanessa; Voduc David; Gelmon Karen; Chia Stephen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  11 in total

1.  Breast and colorectal cancer recurrence and progression captured by five U.S. population-based registries: Findings from National Program of Cancer Registries patient-centered outcome research.

Authors:  Trevor D Thompson; Lori A Pollack; Christopher J Johnson; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Judy R Rees; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Randi Rycroft; MaryBeth Culp; Reda Wilson; Manxia Wu; Kevin Zhang; Vicki Benard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 according to age in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  V Zenzola; M A Cabezas-Quintario; M Arguelles; E Pérez-Fernández; Y Izarzugaza; A Correa; J García-Foncillas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Risk of developing a second primary cancer in male breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isaac Allen; Hend Hassan; Eleni Sofianopoulou; Diana Eccles; Clare Turnbull; Marc Tischkowitz; Paul Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups-prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation.

Authors:  H Vihervuori; K Korpinen; T A Autere; H Repo; K Talvinen; P Kronqvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  Can We Use Survival Data from Cancer Registries to Learn about Disease Recurrence? The Case of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; Zhaohui Zou; Fanni Zhang; Nadia Howlader; Allison W Kurian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Modulation of SOX2 expression delineates an end-point for paclitaxel-effectiveness in breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Pritha Mukherjee; Arnab Gupta; Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay; Urmi Chatterji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Highlights from the 15th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 15-18 March, 2017, Vienna: tailored treatments for patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Consuelo Morigi
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-04-07

8.  Risk factors for distant metastasis of patients with primary triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yi Yao; Yuxin Chu; Bin Xu; Qinyong Hu; Qibin Song
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Clinicopathological characteristics of young versus older patients with breast cancer: A retrospective comparative study from the Madinah region of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulkader M Albasri
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.422

10.  Molecular analyses of triple-negative breast cancer in the young and elderly.

Authors:  Mattias Aine; Ceren Boyaci; Johan Hartman; Jari Häkkinen; Shamik Mitra; Ana Bosch Campos; Emma Nimeus; Anna Ehinger; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Åke Borg; Johan Staaf
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.