Literature DB >> 25209005

Breast cancer in young women: have the prognostic implications of breast cancer subtypes changed over time?

Wilson Sheridan1, Tyldesley Scott, Speers Caroline, Zheng Yvonne, Bernstein Vanessa, Voduc David, Gelmon Karen, Chia Stephen.   

Abstract

We analyzed the impact of age according to subtype and compared outcomes for breast cancer (BC) patients across two time periods to determine whether the previously observed poor prognosis associated with BC in young women persists in the context of modern adjuvant therapies and relative to BC subtypes. Women aged <50 years (y) diagnosed with invasive BC between 1986-1992 and 2004-2007 were identified from British Columbia Cancer Agency's Breast Cancer Outcomes Database and analyzed by age category (<40 and 40-49 years) and subtype. Subtypes were defined by immunohistochemistry. Relapse-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analyses using Cox regression models were performed to adjust for prognostic variables. Age <40 was associated with inferior 5y-RFS for Luminal cases within both time cohorts (1986-1992: 65 vs. 77 %, P = 0.009, 2004-2007: 79 vs. 92 %, P = < 0.001). Inferior 5y-RFS was observed for those <40 with HER2-positive cancers in the 1986-1992, but not 2004-2007 cohort (49 vs. 66 %, P = 0.017, and 89 vs. 89 %, P = 0.879). No difference according to age was observed for triple-negative cancers in either time cohort (1986-1992: 60 vs. 63 %, P = 0.868, 2004-2007: 78 vs. 77 %, P = 0.933). 5y-RFS improved over time for all subgroups. OS for the Luminal subgroup improved for those 40-49 years but not <40 years. The effect of age varies with subtype. Age <40 years predicts inferior RFS and OS for Luminal BC in the modern era. Research efforts should target Luminal BC in young women for whom discrepancies in outcome persist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209005     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3125-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  31 in total

1.  In stage II/III lymph node-positive breast cancer patients less than 55 years of age, keratin 8 expression in lymph node metastases but not in the primary tumour is an indicator of better survival.

Authors:  Serena Bonin; Danae Pracella; Renzo Barbazza; Sandro Sulfaro; Giorgio Stanta
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  The effect of young age on survival in breast cancer: early results.

Authors:  Daniele Schneider; Andrea Souto Damin; Adriana Vial Roehe
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Are there patients with T1 to T2, lymph node-negative breast cancer who are "high-risk" for locoregional disease recurrence?

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Sujata Patil; Michelle M Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer: the impact of age on patterns of development and outcome.

Authors:  Matan Ben-Zion Berliner; Rinat Yerushalmi; Inbar Lavie; Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel; Daliah Tsoref; Daniel Hendler; Hadar Goldvaser; Michal Sarfaty; Ofer Rotem; Olga Ulitsky; Tali Siegal; Victoria Neiman; Shlomit Yust-Katz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 according to age in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  V Zenzola; M A Cabezas-Quintario; M Arguelles; E Pérez-Fernández; Y Izarzugaza; A Correa; J García-Foncillas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Treatment Efficacy, Adherence, and Quality of Life Among Women Younger Than 35 Years in the International Breast Cancer Study Group TEXT and SOFT Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Trials.

Authors:  Poornima Saha; Meredith M Regan; Olivia Pagani; Prudence A Francis; Barbara A Walley; Karin Ribi; Jürg Bernhard; Weixiu Luo; Henry L Gómez; Harold J Burstein; Vani Parmar; Roberto Torres; Josephine Stewart; Meritxell Bellet; Antonia Perelló; Faysal Dane; Antonio Moreira; Daniel Vorobiof; Michelle Nottage; Karen N Price; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Richard D Gelber; Marco Colleoni; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach.

Authors:  D Ribnikar; J M Ribeiro; D Pinto; B Sousa; A C Pinto; E Gomes; E C Moser; M J Cardoso; F Cardoso
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

8.  Where youth matters-clinicopathologic characteristics and emerging trends in treatment and outcomes in young Irish women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Megan Greally; Jennifer Kielty; Geoffrey A Watson; Geoffrey Das; Christina Malouf; Lynda McSorley; Niamh Coleman; Cecily Quinn; Enda W McDermott; Giuseppe Gullo; John Crown; Ruth S Prichard; Catherine M Kelly; Janice M Walshe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Prognostic effect analysis of molecular subtype on young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hong-Liang Chen; Ang Ding; Fu-Wen Wang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  A population-based analysis of breast cancer incidence and survival by subtype in Ontario women.

Authors:  S J Seung; A N Traore; B Pourmirza; K E Fathers; M Coombes; K J Jerzak
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.