Literature DB >> 27779600

Lumbar Spine Paraspinal Muscle and Intervertebral Disc Height Changes in Astronauts After Long-Duration Spaceflight on the International Space Station.

Douglas G Chang1, Robert M Healey1, Alexander J Snyder1, Jojo V Sayson2, Brandon R Macias3, Dezba G Coughlin4, Jeannie F Bailey4, Scott E Parazynski5, Jeffrey C Lotz4, Alan R Hargens1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate lumbar paraspinal muscle (PSM) cross-sectional area and intervertebral disc (IVD) height changes induced by a 6-month space mission on the International Space Station. The long-term objective of this project is to promote spine health and prevent spinal injury during space missions and here on Earth. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) crewmembers have a 4.3 times higher risk of herniated IVDs, compared with the general and military aviator populations. The highest risk occurs during the first year after a mission. Microgravity exposure during long-duration spaceflights results in approximately 5 cm lengthening of body height, spinal pain, and skeletal deconditioning. How the PSMs and IVDs respond during spaceflight is not well described.
METHODS: Six NASA crewmembers were imaged supine with a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging was conducted preflight, immediately postflight, and then 33 to 67 days after landing. Functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) measurements of the PSMs were performed at the L3-4 level. FCSA was measured by grayscale thresholding within the posterior lumbar extensors to isolate lean muscle on T2-weighted scans. IVD heights were measured at the anterior, middle, and posterior sections of all lumbar levels. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine significance at P < 0.05, followed by post-hoc testing.
RESULTS: Paraspinal lean muscle mass, as indicated by the FCSA, decreased from 86% of the total PSM cross-sectional area down to 72%, immediately after the mission. Recovery of 68% of the postflight loss occurred during the next 6 weeks, still leaving a significantly lower lean muscle fractional content compared with preflight values. In contrast, lumbar IVD heights were not appreciably different at any time point.
CONCLUSION: The data reveal lumbar spine PSM atrophy after long-duration spaceflight. Some FCSA recovery was seen with 46 days postflight in a terrestrial environment, but it remained incomplete compared with preflight levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27779600      PMCID: PMC5588025          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.241


  50 in total

1.  Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain.

Authors:  J A Hides; G A Jull; C A Richardson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Quantitative paraspinal muscle measurements: inter-software reliability and agreement using OsiriX and ImageJ.

Authors:  Maryse Fortin; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08

3.  Space adaptation back pain: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Eric L Kerstman; Richard A Scheuring; Matrr G Barnes; Tyson B DeKorse; Lynn G Saile
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2012-01

4.  Effect of acute head-down tilt on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area and proton transverse relaxation time.

Authors:  M S Conley; J M Foley; L L Ploutz-Snyder; R A Meyer; G A Dudley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-10

Review 5.  Multifidus and paraspinal muscle group cross-sectional areas of patients with low back pain and control patients: a systematic review with a focus on blinding.

Authors:  Maryse Fortin; Luciana Gazzi Macedo
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-03-15

Review 6.  Prevention of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Chris G Maher; Leani S M Pereira; Matthew L Stevens; Vinicius C Oliveira; Meredith Chapple; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Low Back Pain in Microgravity and Bed Rest Studies.

Authors:  Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Daniel L Belavý; Julie A Hides; Carolyn A Richardson; Chris J Snijders
Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.053

8.  T2 relaxation times of intervertebral disc tissue correlated with water content and proteoglycan content.

Authors:  Nicholas L Marinelli; Victor M Haughton; Alejandro Muñoz; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Clinical validation of functional flexion-extension roentgenograms of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  J Dvorák; M M Panjabi; J E Novotny; D G Chang; D Grob
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Yoga as a treatment for chronic low back pain: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Douglas G Chang; Jacquelyn A Holt; Marisa Sklar; Erik J Groessl
Journal:  J Orthop Rheumatol       Date:  2016-01-01
View more
  27 in total

1.  Analysis of radiological parameters associated with decreased fractional anisotropy values on diffusion tensor imaging in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Xiandi Wang; Hongli Wang; Chi Sun; Shuyi Zhou; Tao Meng; Feizhou Lv; Xiaosheng Ma; Xinlei Xia; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  High intensity training during spaceflight: results from the NASA Sprint Study.

Authors:  Kirk L English; Meghan Downs; Elizabeth Goetchius; Roxanne Buxton; Jeffrey W Ryder; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Mark Guilliams; Jessica M Scott; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.415

3.  Change in fatty infiltration of lumbar multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles in asymptomatic adults of Asian or Caucasian ethnicities.

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; James M Elliott; Thomas Volken
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cardiac output by pulse contour analysis does not match the increase measured by rebreathing during human spaceflight.

Authors:  Richard L Hughson; Sean D Peterson; Nicholas J Yee; Danielle K Greaves
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-08-10

5.  Is a single-level measurement of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration and cross-sectional area representative of the entire lumbar spine?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Daniel Lobos; Marcelo Andia; Cristobal Arrieta; Sergio Uribe
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; Jeannie F Bailey; Maryse Fortin; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Change in Lumbar Muscle Size and Composition on MRI with Long-Duration Spaceflight.

Authors:  Katelyn A Greene; Janet A Tooze; Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 8.  Skeletal changes during and after spaceflight.

Authors:  Laurence Vico; Alan Hargens
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  The individual and combined effects of spaceflight radiation and microgravity on biologic systems and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Willey; Richard A Britten; Elizabeth Blaber; Candice G T Tahimic; Jeffrey Chancellor; Marie Mortreux; Larry D Sanford; Angela J Kubik; Michael D Delp; Xiao Wen Mao
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog       Date:  2021

10.  The effects of spaceflight microgravity on the musculoskeletal system of humans and animals, with an emphasis on exercise as a countermeasure: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  D Moosavi; D Wolovsky; A Depompeis; D Uher; D Lennington; R Bodden; C E Garber
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.