Literature DB >> 29700619

Analysis of radiological parameters associated with decreased fractional anisotropy values on diffusion tensor imaging in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Xiandi Wang1, Hongli Wang1, Chi Sun1, Shuyi Zhou2, Tao Meng3, Feizhou Lv1, Xiaosheng Ma1, Xinlei Xia1, Jianyuan Jiang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies have indicated that decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) values on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are well correlated with the symptoms of nerve root compression. The aim of our study is to determine primary radiological parameters associated with decreased FA values in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis involving single L5 nerve root.
METHODS: Patients confirmed with single L5 nerve root compression by transforaminal nerve root blocks were included in this study. FA values of L5 nerve roots on both symptomatic and asymptomatic side were obtained. Conventional radiological parameters, such as disc height, degenerative scoliosis, dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA), foraminal height (FH), hypertrophic facet joint degeneration (HFJD), sagittal rotation (SR), sedimentation sign, sagittal translation and traction spur were measured. Correlation and regression analyses were performed between the radiological parameters and FA values of the symptomatic L5 nerve roots. A predictive regression equation was established.
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in this study. FA values were significantly lower at the symptomatic side comparing to the asymptomatic side (0.263 ± 0.069 vs. 0.334 ± 0.080, P = 0.038). DSCSA, FH, HFJD, and SR were significantly correlated with the decreased FA values, with r = 0.518, 0.443, 0.472 and - 0.910, respectively (P < 0.05). DSCSA and SR were found to be the primary radiological parameters related to the decreased FA values, and the regression equation is FA = - 0.012 × SR + 0.002 × DSCSA.
CONCLUSIONS: DSCSA and SR were primary contributors to decreased FA values in LSS patients involving single L5 nerve root, indicating that central canal decompression and segmental stability should be the first considerations in preoperative planning of these patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Nerve roots; Radiological parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700619     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5562-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints.

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M Zanetti; N Boos; J Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Pre- and post-operative diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Jaana Hiltunen; Erika Kirveskari; Jussi Numminen; Nina Lindfors; Harry Göransson; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effects of acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and structure. An experimental study of the pig cauda equina.

Authors:  B L Rydevik; R A Pedowitz; A R Hargens; M R Swenson; R R Myers; S R Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  MRI versus CT for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Sang Soo Eun; Ho-Yeon Lee; Sang-Ho Lee; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Wei Chiang Liu
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.447

5.  Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  W Frobin; P Brinckmann; G Leivseth; M Biggemann; O Reikerås
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  MR neurography of the median nerve at 3.0T: optimization of diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography.

Authors:  Roman Guggenberger; Patrick Eppenberger; Daniel Markovic; Daniel Nanz; Avneesh Chhabra; Klaas P Pruessmann; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Jörn Lange; Christoph P Röder; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; Robert Cole; David H Kim; Ling Li; Pradeep Suri; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.

Authors:  Mustafa Sirvanci; Mona Bhatia; Kursat Ali Ganiyusufoglu; Cihan Duran; Mehmet Tezer; Cagatay Ozturk; Mehmet Aydogan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  2 in total

1.  The evaluation on neural status of cervical spinal cord in normal and Hirayama disease using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Chi Sun; Shuyi Zhou; Zhongyi Cui; Yuxuan Zhang; Hongli Wang; Jianyuan Jiang; Feizhou Lu; Xiaosheng Ma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  MR neurography of lumbosacral nerve roots for differentiating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy from acquired axonal polyneuropathies: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fei Wu; Weiwei Wang; Yang Yang; Hanqiu Liu; Yan Ren; Chong Li; Jie Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.