| Literature DB >> 27777547 |
L Rosenberg1, Y Shoham2, Y Krieger2, G Rubin3, F Sander4, J Koller5, K David6, D Egosi7, R Ahuja8, A J Singer9.
Abstract
Current surgical and non-surgical eschar removal-debridement techniques are invasive or ineffective. A bromelainbased rapid and selective enzymatic debriding agent was developed to overcome these disadvantages and compared with the standard of care (SOC). The safety and efficacy of a novel Debriding Gel Dressing (DGD) was determined in patients with deep partial and full thickness burns covering up to 67% total body surface area (TBSA). This review summarizes data from seven studies, four of which were randomized clinical trials that included a SOC or control vehicle. DGD eschar debridement efficacy was >90% in all studies, comparable to the SOC and significantly greater than the control vehicle. The total area excised was less in patients treated with DGD compared with the control vehicle (22.9% vs. 73.2%, P<0.001) or the surgical/non-surgical SOC (50.5%, P=0.006). The incidence of surgical debridement in patients treated with DGD was lower than the SOC (40/163 [24.5%] vs. 119/170 [70.0%], P0.001). Less autografting was used in all studies. Long-term scar quality and function were similar in DGD- and SOCtreated. DGD is a safe and effective method of burn debridement that offers an alternative to surgical and non-surgical SOC.Entities:
Keywords: DGD; NexoBrid®; burns; debriding gel dressing; enzymatic debridement; enzymatic escharotomy
Year: 2015 PMID: 27777547 PMCID: PMC5068895
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Burns Fire Disasters ISSN: 1592-9558