Literature DB >> 21979853

Reepithelialization of mid-dermal porcine burns after rapid enzymatic debridement with Debrase®.

Adam J Singer1, Breena R Taira, Ryon Anderson, Steve A McClain, Lior Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Reepithelialization of mid-dermal burns is delayed by the presence of a layer of necrotic eschar. The authors hypothesized that rapid selective debridement using an enzymatic bromelain-based preparation, Debrase®, would speed reepithelialization. Forty mid-dermal burns (2.5 × 2.5 cm) were created on the back and flanks of two anesthetized domestic pigs (25 kg) using an aluminum bar (150 g) preheated in hot water (80°C) and applied for 20 seconds. The burns were randomized to a 4-hour topical application of Debrase® (n = 20) or its vehicle (n = 20) followed by daily application of a petrolatum-based triple antibiotic. Wounds were visualized and photographed daily for evidence of reepithelialization. Reepithelialization was considered complete when the entire wound was opaque and dry when blotted with tissue paper. 4-mm full-thickness biopsies were obtained for histological analysis using hematoxylin and eosin staining by a board-certified dermatopathologist masked to the burn therapy at 7, 9, 11, and 13 days after injury. The primary outcome was time to complete reepithelialization of the burns. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of burns that were reepithelialized at days 7, 11, and 13 and the mean percentage reepithelialization on microscopic analysis. A sample of 20 burns in each group had 80% power to detect a 2-day difference in the time to complete reepithelialization (two-tailed, P < .05). Application of Debrase®, but not the control vehicle, resulted in dissolution of the necrotic upper dermis in all treated burns. The mean time to complete reepithelialization was faster for Debrase®-treated (7.4 ± 0.8 days) than control-treated (9.1 ± 2.1 days) burns: difference, 1.7 days (95% confidence interval, 0.5-2.9). The percentage of completely reepithelialized Debrase®- and control-treated burns were day 7, 65.0 vs 25.0% (P = .02); day 9, 80.0 vs 40.0% (P = .02); and day 11, 100.0 vs 92.0% (P = .45). Treatment of mid-dermal porcine burns with a single topical application of Debrase® results in earlier wound reepithelialization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21979853     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31822dc467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  10 in total

1.  Bromelain down-regulates myofibroblast differentiation in an in vitro wound healing assay.

Authors:  Kathrin Aichele; Monika Bubel; Gunther Deubel; Tim Pohlemann; Martin Oberringer
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Does Platelet-Rich Fibrin Enhance Healing Of Burn Wounds? Our First Experiences And Main Pitfalls.

Authors:  A Schulz; J L Schiefer; P C Fuchs; C H Kanho; N Nourah; W Heitzmann
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-03-31

3.  Minimally invasive burn care: a review of seven clinical studies of rapid and selective debridement using a bromelain-based debriding enzyme (Nexobrid®).

Authors:  L Rosenberg; Y Shoham; Y Krieger; G Rubin; F Sander; J Koller; K David; D Egosi; R Ahuja; A J Singer
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  Enzymatic debridement after mobile phone explosion: a case report.

Authors:  M Cherubino; I Pellegatta; D Sallam; E Pulerà; L Valdatta
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  Degradation of MSCRAMM target macromolecules in VLU slough by Lucilia sericata chymotrypsin 1 (ISP) persists in the presence of tissue gelatinase activity.

Authors:  David I Pritchard; Alan P Brown
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  How to create burn porcine models: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Wardhana; R F M Lumbuun; D Kurniasari
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-03-31

7.  Cost Analysis of a Novel Enzymatic Debriding Agent for Management of Burn Wounds.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giudice; Angela Filoni; Giulio Maggio; Domenico Bonamonte; Michelangelo Vestita
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Evaluation of debridement effects of bromelain-loaded sodium alginate nanoparticles incorporated into chitosan hydrogel in animal models.

Authors:  Samaneh Bayat; Akram Rabbani Zabihi; Sara Amel Farzad; Jebrail Movaffagh; Ezzat Hashemi; Sepideh Arabzadeh; Maryam Hahsemi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.699

Review 9.  Therapeutic Strategies to Reduce Burn Wound Conversion.

Authors:  Alen Palackic; Jayson W Jay; Robert P Duggan; Ludwik K Branski; Steven E Wolf; Naseem Ansari; Amina El Ayadi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 10.  Electrospun Fibers Loaded with Natural Bioactive Compounds as a Biomedical System for Skin Burn Treatment. A Review.

Authors:  Jeyson Hermosilla; Edgar Pastene-Navarrete; Francisca Acevedo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.