Literature DB >> 27771788

Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals.

Yasutsugu Yukawa1,2, Fumihiko Kato3, Kota Suda4, Masatsune Yamagata5, Takayoshi Ueta6, Munehito Yoshida7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to establish normative data for parameters of spino-pelvic and spinal sagittal alignment, gender related differences and age-related changes in asymptomatic subjects.
METHODS: A total of 626 asymptomatic volunteers from Japanese population were enrolled in this study, including 50 subjects at least for each gender and each decade from 3rd to 8th. Full length, free-standing spine radiographs were obtained. Cervical lordosis (CL; C3-7), thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1-12), lumbar lordosis (LL; T12-S1), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured.
RESULTS: The average values (degrees) are 4.1 ± 11.7 for CL, 36.0 ± 10.1 for TK, 49.7 ± 11.2 for LL, 53.7 ± 10.9 for PI, 14.5 ± 8.4 for PT, and 39.4 ± 8.0 for SS. Mean SVA is 3.1 ± 12.6 mm. Advancing age caused an increase in CL, PT and SVA, and a decrease in LL and SS. There was a significant gender difference in CL, TK, LL, PI, PT and SVA. From 7th decade to 8th decade, remarkable decrease of LL & TK and increase of PT were seen. A large increase of SVA was also seen between 60' and 70'.
CONCLUSION: Standard values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment were established in each gender and each decade from 20' to 70'. A remarkable change of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment was seen from 7th decade to 8th decade in asymptomatic subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-related change; Gender difference; Spine radiograph; Spinopelvic sagittal alignment; Standard value

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27771788     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4807-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

Review 1.  Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Charles Kuntz; Linda S Levin; Stephen L Ondra; Christopher I Shaffrey; Chad J Morgan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-02

2.  Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Kota Suda; Masatsune Yamagata; Takayoshi Ueta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms.

Authors:  J W Hardacker; R F Shuford; P N Capicotto; P W Pryor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Improvement of spinal alignment and quality of life after corrective surgery for spinal kyphosis in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study with non-operated patients.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; M Hongo; T Kobayashi; T Abe; E Abe; Y Shimada
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population.

Authors:  P G Korovessis; M V Stamatakis; A G Baikousis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Reid Boyce; Wafa Skalli; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Craniopelvic alignment in elderly asymptomatic individuals: analysis of 671 cranial centers of gravity.

Authors:  Go Yoshida; Tatsuya Yasuda; Daisuke Togawa; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Sho Kobayashi; Hideyuki Arima; Hironobu Hoshino; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers.

Authors:  D E Gelb; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; K Blanke; K W McEnery
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Nicola Hawkinson; Pierre-Marie Gagey; Stephen Ondra; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  28 in total

1.  Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.

Authors:  Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

2.  The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Daisuke Kurosawa; Takako Nishi; Keisuke Ito; Daijiro Morimoto; Yoshiro Musha; Hiroshi Ozawa; Eiichi Murakami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Effect of lumbar laminectomy on spinal sagittal alignment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juho Hatakka; Katri Pernaa; Juho Rantakokko; Inari Laaksonen; Mikhail Saltychev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The change of cervical spine alignment along with aging in asymptomatic population: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Yiwei Chen; Jiaquan Luo; Zhimin Pan; Limin Yu; Long Pang; Junlong Zhong; Zhiyun Li; Zhimin Han; Kai Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spinopelvic Parameters among Healthy Volunteers in Iran.

Authors:  Hamid Rezaee; Gholamreza Bahadorkhan; Mohammadreza Ehsaei; Babak Ganjeifar; Ehsan Keykhosravi; Masoud Pishjoo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-09

7.  Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: institutional case series.

Authors:  Luca Proietti; Andrea Perna; Luca Ricciardi; Caterina Fumo; Domenico Alessandro Santagada; Ilaria Giannelli; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Antonio Leone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Effects of standing on lumbar spine alignment and intervertebral disc geometry in young, healthy individuals determined by positional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian I Weber; Ching-Ting Hwang; Linda R van Dillen; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Comparison of 3D and 2D characterization of spinal geometry from biplanar X-rays: a large cohort study.

Authors:  Zongshan Hu; Claudio Vergari; Laurent Gajny; Zhen Liu; Tsz-Ping Lam; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Gene C W Man; Kwong-Hang Yeung; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07

10.  A simple method for estimating the intervertebral disc compressive force based on the posture analysis of community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Azusa Nishizawa; Junji Katsuhira; Makoto Watanabe; Hiroyuki Oka; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.