Literature DB >> 9231966

Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms.

J W Hardacker1, R F Shuford, P N Capicotto, P W Pryor.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A radiographic evaluation of standing cervical and global sagittal alignment in 100 adult volunteers with no neck or radicular arm symptoms was undertaken.
OBJECTIVES: To document and define cervical standing lateral alignment and balance in a volunteer population without cervical problems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimal data exist on cervical segmental sagittal alignment distributions in stance.
METHODS: Radiographic measures of spinal alignment were collected and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Data were categorized into two age- and sex-matched groups. Group 1 had no cervical or lumbar symptoms. Group 2 had no cervical symptoms, but had lumbar symptoms. Mean total and segmental cervical alignment distributions were not statistically different between groups. Mean total cervical lordosis in stance for the entire group was -40.0 +/- 9.7 degrees. Thoracic and lumbar alignment were within previously reported measures and not statistically different between groups. Plumb line markers at C7 and sacral reference points were not statistically different between groups. Pearson correlations revealed that cervical sagittal plane alignment vaired inversely with thoracic alignment. Independent orthopedists noted cervical osteoarthritis was present in 17% of each group of volunteers with substantial kappa agreement (0.73) between observers. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of sagittal alignment measures of 30 randomly remeasured radiographs revealed strong correlation between observations.
CONCLUSIONS: No differences in total cervical lordosis were noted between cervical asymptomatic volunteers with or without low back pain. Most cervical lordosis occurred at the C1-C2 level in stance, whereas only 6 degrees (15%) occurred at the lowest three cervical levels (C4-C7). Changes in cervical lordosis correlated inversely with changes in thoracic alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9231966     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199707010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  79 in total

1.  Débridement and Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in Kyphotic Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Zhimin Pan; Jiaquan Luo; Limin Yu; Yiwei Chen; Junlong Zhong; Zhiyun Li; Zhaoxun Zeng; Pingguo Duan; Yoon Ha; Kai Cao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain.

Authors:  D Grob; H Frauenfelder; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of fallacious arguments, Ad Hominem attacks, and biased 'expert opinions' can make CBP research 'appear flawed'.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Donald D Harrison; Paul A Oakley; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prospective multi-centric evaluation of upper cervical and infra-cervical sagittal compensatory alignment in patients with adult cervical deformity.

Authors:  Subaraman Ramchandran; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Daniel Sciubba; Justin K Scheer; Cyrus M Jalai; Alan Daniels; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Gregory Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Robert A Hart; Justin S Smith; Christopher Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  CORR Insights®: Débridement and Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in Kyphotic Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Zeeshan Mohammad Sardar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  [Normal sagittal profile of the cervical spine - must the cervical spine always be lordotic?]

Authors:  M Akbar; H Almansour; B Diebo; D Adler; W Pepke; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  An in vitro evaluation of sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants.

Authors:  Donald J Blaskiewicz; Jeffrey E Harris; Patrick P Han; Alexander W Turner; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.