Zongshan Hu1,2,3, Claudio Vergari4, Laurent Gajny4, Zhen Liu1, Tsz-Ping Lam2,3, Zezhang Zhu1,3, Yong Qiu1,3, Gene C W Man2,3, Kwong-Hang Yeung3,5, Winnie C W Chu3,5, Jack C Y Cheng2,3, Wafa Skalli4. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 3. The Joint Scoliosis Research Center of the Chinese University of Hong Kong-Nanjing University, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 4. Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (IBHGC), HESAM Université, Paris, France. 5. Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biplanar X-ray system providing anteroposterior and sagittal plane with an ultra-low radiation dose and in weight-bearing position is increasingly used for spine imaging. The original three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction method from biplanar X-rays has been widely used for clinical parameters, however, the main issue is that manual adjustments of the 3D model was quite time-consuming and limited to thoracolumbar spine. A quasi-automated 3D reconstruction method of the spine from cervical vertebra to pelvis was proposed, which proved fast and accurate in 57 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The aim of this study was to compare the newly developed technique of quasi-automatic 3D measurement with classical 2D measurements in a large cohort. METHODS: A total of 494 adults with biplanar EOS X-ray scanning were included in this study and divided into health and deformity group according to the presence of spinal deformity. The proposed method of quasi-automatic 3D measurement was applied to all these subjects. The radiographic parameters included: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) in sagittal plane, and cobb angle in coronal plane. Comparison was made between quasi-automatic and manual measurement. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.7±19.9 years old. In the whole population, the mean differences between the two methods were 3.9° for TK (30.5°±9.9° vs. 26.5°±9.3°, P<0.001), -5.2° for LL (-47.5°±11.2° vs. -42.4°±11.0°, P<0.001), 3.6° for PI (46.9°±10.3° vs. 43.9°±10.3°, P<0.001), -0.2° for PT (11.9°±7.7° vs. 12.0°±8.2°, P=0.328), -2.1 mm for SVA (15.7±26.2 vs. 17.8±26.3 mm, P=0.221) and -1.1° for TPA (9.0°±7.6° vs. 10.1°±7.8°, P=0.051). The deformity group had similar mean differences with the asymptomatic group with the values ranged from -4.1° to 3.8° for sagittal parameters. The mean differences of Cobb angle were 1.9° for patients with Cobb angle <30° and 2.3° for patients with Cobb angle >30°, respectively. Correlation analysis showed r2 for all clinical parameters ranged from 0.667 to 0.923. On average, the new method takes 5 minutes to compute all the parameters for one case. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this ergonomic and efficient quasi-automatic method for full spine proved fast and accurate measurement in a large population, which showed great potential in extensive clinical application. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Biplanar X-ray system providing anteroposterior and sagittal plane with an ultra-low radiation dose and in weight-bearing position is increasingly used for spine imaging. The original three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction method from biplanar X-rays has been widely used for clinical parameters, however, the main issue is that manual adjustments of the 3D model was quite time-consuming and limited to thoracolumbar spine. A quasi-automated 3D reconstruction method of the spine from cervical vertebra to pelvis was proposed, which proved fast and accurate in 57 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The aim of this study was to compare the newly developed technique of quasi-automatic 3D measurement with classical 2D measurements in a large cohort. METHODS: A total of 494 adults with biplanar EOS X-ray scanning were included in this study and divided into health and deformity group according to the presence of spinal deformity. The proposed method of quasi-automatic 3D measurement was applied to all these subjects. The radiographic parameters included: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) in sagittal plane, and cobb angle in coronal plane. Comparison was made between quasi-automatic and manual measurement. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.7±19.9 years old. In the whole population, the mean differences between the two methods were 3.9° for TK (30.5°±9.9° vs. 26.5°±9.3°, P<0.001), -5.2° for LL (-47.5°±11.2° vs. -42.4°±11.0°, P<0.001), 3.6° for PI (46.9°±10.3° vs. 43.9°±10.3°, P<0.001), -0.2° for PT (11.9°±7.7° vs. 12.0°±8.2°, P=0.328), -2.1 mm for SVA (15.7±26.2 vs. 17.8±26.3 mm, P=0.221) and -1.1° for TPA (9.0°±7.6° vs. 10.1°±7.8°, P=0.051). The deformity group had similar mean differences with the asymptomatic group with the values ranged from -4.1° to 3.8° for sagittal parameters. The mean differences of Cobb angle were 1.9° for patients with Cobb angle <30° and 2.3° for patients with Cobb angle >30°, respectively. Correlation analysis showed r2 for all clinical parameters ranged from 0.667 to 0.923. On average, the new method takes 5 minutes to compute all the parameters for one case. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this ergonomic and efficient quasi-automatic method for full spine proved fast and accurate measurement in a large population, which showed great potential in extensive clinical application. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Junhua Zhang; Edmond Lou; Lawrence H Le; Douglas L Hill; James V Raso; Yuanyuan Wang Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2008-05-31 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Steven D Glassman; Sigurd Berven; Keith Bridwell; William Horton; John R Dimar Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Themistocles Protopsaltis; Frank Schwab; Nicolas Bronsard; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Devon J Ryan; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Douglas Burton; Christopher Ames; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Thomas Errico; Virginie Lafage Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Shao-Jie Zhang; Kun Li; Zhi-Jun Li; Xing Wang; Jia-Hui Dong; Jian Wang; Jie Chen; Xing-Yue Qu; Zi-Yu Li; Yu-Hang Liu Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2021-09-16